Life cycle assessment of plastic grocery bags and their alternatives in cities with con fi ned waste management structure: A Singapore case study

被引:66
作者
Ahamed, Ashiq [1 ,2 ]
Vallam, Pramodh [3 ]
Iyer, Nikhil Shiva [4 ]
Veksha, Andrei [1 ]
Bobacka, Johan [2 ]
Lisak, Grzegorz [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Nanyang Technol Univ, Residues & Resource Reclamat Ctr, Nanyang Environm & Water Res Inst, 1 Cleantech Loop,CleanTech One, Singapore 637141, Singapore
[2] Abo Akad Univ, Lab Mol Sci & Engn, Johan Gadolin Proc Chem Ctr, FI-20500 Turku, Finland
[3] Nanyang Technol Univ, Nanyang Environm & Water Res Inst, 1 Cleantech Loop,CleanTech One, Singapore 637141, Singapore
[4] Nanyang Technol Univ, Sch Civil & Environm Engn, Singapore 639798, Singapore
关键词
LCA; Plastic; Environmental impacts; Global warming; Waste management; Grocery bags; MILLING FACTORIES; IMPACTS; ENERGY; BIODEGRADABILITY; POLLUTION; POLICIES; COTTON; PULP;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123956
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Plastic grocery bags are one of the most ubiquitous single-use packaging products. Recently, 'ecofriendly' options of plastic grocery bags have gained traction such as kraft paper, cotton, biodegradable, and reusable polypropylene non-woven bags. However, the impact of using various grocery bags in cities with dense population, well-developed infrastructure and thermal treatment as an end-of-life waste management option has been insufficiently documented. In this study, commonly found single-use (HDPE, biodegradable plastic, kraft paper) bags and reusable (cotton, polypropylene non-woven) bags were considered for the life cycle assessment (LCA). The usage characteristics (reusability, dimensions, carrying capacity) of bags, the production process (raw materials extraction, production processes), and emissions were determined as the significant factors contributing to the negative environmental im-pacts. In a model city with confined waste management, the assessment determined that the reusable polypropylene non-woven bag (PNB) caused the least overall negative environmental impacts when there are 50 instances of reuse, followed by single use HDPE plastic bag (HPB). The global warming potential (excluding biogenic carbon) was 14, 81, 17 and 16 times higher for HDPE plastic, kraft paper, cotton woven and biodegradable polymer bags, respectively, when compared to PNB. Moreover, kraft paper or cotton woven bags demonstrated the highest negative impacts for the impact categories including abiotic fossil depletion, freshwater-, marineand terrestrial-ecotoxicities, human toxicity, acidification and eutrophication potentials. Further, sensitivity analysis indicated that the inflexion point for the PNB was minimum 4 reuses to avoid emission equivalent to the HPB. Singapore was adopted as the model city with confined waste management structure that imports most of the grocery bags, either as finished goods or as raw materials. Through comprehensive insights based on the new outlook of the integrated LCA model (cradle-to-grave) that included full-scale transportation component, the usage of the real case data from a city to develop the life cycle inventory, and consideration of the existing grocery bags options, the environmental assessment along with critical evaluation was conducted. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A comparative cradle-to-grave life cycle assessment of single-use plastic shopping bags and various alternatives available in South Africa
    William Stafford
    Valentina Russo
    Anton Nahman
    [J]. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2022, 27 : 1213 - 1227
  • [42] A comparative cradle-to-grave life cycle assessment of single-use plastic shopping bags and various alternatives available in South Africa
    Stafford, William
    Russo, Valentina
    Nahman, Anton
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2022, 27 (9-11) : 1213 - 1227
  • [43] Life cycle assessment of composite packaging waste management-a Chinese case study on aseptic packaging
    Xie, Minghui
    Qiao, Qi
    Sun, Qihong
    Zhang, Linlin
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2013, 18 (03) : 626 - 635
  • [44] Multi-objective optimization of life cycle assessment of integrated waste management based on genetic algorithms: A case study of Tehran
    Movahed, Zahra Pourreza
    Kabiri, Mohammad
    Ranjbar, Saeed
    Joda, Fatemeh
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 247
  • [45] Life-cycle sustainability assessment of pavement maintenance alternatives: Methodology and case study
    Zheng, Xiaoyan
    Easa, Said M.
    Yang, Zhengxian
    Ji, Tao
    Jiang, Zhenliang
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 213 : 659 - 672
  • [46] Life cycle assessment of alternative technologies for municipal solid waste and plastic solid waste management in the Greater London area
    Al-Salem, S. M.
    Evangelisti, S.
    Lettieri, P.
    [J]. CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2014, 244 : 391 - 402
  • [47] Comprehensive life cycle assessment of garden organic waste valorisation: A case study in regional Australia
    Adhikari, Sirjana
    Mahmud, M. A. Parvez
    Moon, Ellen
    Timms, Wendy
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2024, 472
  • [48] Life-cycle assessment of municipal solid waste management alternatives with consideration of uncertainty: SIWMS development and application
    El Hanandeh, Ali
    El-Zein, Abbas
    [J]. WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2010, 30 (05) : 902 - 911
  • [49] Comparative assessment of life cycle impacts of various plastic waste management scenarios in Johannesburg, South Africa
    Mazhandu, Zvanaka S.
    Muzenda, Edison
    Belaid, Mohamed
    Nhubu, Trust
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2023, 28 (05) : 536 - 553
  • [50] Comparative assessment of life cycle impacts of various plastic waste management scenarios in Johannesburg, South Africa
    Zvanaka S. Mazhandu
    Edison Muzenda
    Mohamed Belaid
    Trust Nhubu
    [J]. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2023, 28 : 536 - 553