Life cycle assessment of plastic grocery bags and their alternatives in cities with con fi ned waste management structure: A Singapore case study

被引:66
作者
Ahamed, Ashiq [1 ,2 ]
Vallam, Pramodh [3 ]
Iyer, Nikhil Shiva [4 ]
Veksha, Andrei [1 ]
Bobacka, Johan [2 ]
Lisak, Grzegorz [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Nanyang Technol Univ, Residues & Resource Reclamat Ctr, Nanyang Environm & Water Res Inst, 1 Cleantech Loop,CleanTech One, Singapore 637141, Singapore
[2] Abo Akad Univ, Lab Mol Sci & Engn, Johan Gadolin Proc Chem Ctr, FI-20500 Turku, Finland
[3] Nanyang Technol Univ, Nanyang Environm & Water Res Inst, 1 Cleantech Loop,CleanTech One, Singapore 637141, Singapore
[4] Nanyang Technol Univ, Sch Civil & Environm Engn, Singapore 639798, Singapore
关键词
LCA; Plastic; Environmental impacts; Global warming; Waste management; Grocery bags; MILLING FACTORIES; IMPACTS; ENERGY; BIODEGRADABILITY; POLLUTION; POLICIES; COTTON; PULP;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123956
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Plastic grocery bags are one of the most ubiquitous single-use packaging products. Recently, 'ecofriendly' options of plastic grocery bags have gained traction such as kraft paper, cotton, biodegradable, and reusable polypropylene non-woven bags. However, the impact of using various grocery bags in cities with dense population, well-developed infrastructure and thermal treatment as an end-of-life waste management option has been insufficiently documented. In this study, commonly found single-use (HDPE, biodegradable plastic, kraft paper) bags and reusable (cotton, polypropylene non-woven) bags were considered for the life cycle assessment (LCA). The usage characteristics (reusability, dimensions, carrying capacity) of bags, the production process (raw materials extraction, production processes), and emissions were determined as the significant factors contributing to the negative environmental im-pacts. In a model city with confined waste management, the assessment determined that the reusable polypropylene non-woven bag (PNB) caused the least overall negative environmental impacts when there are 50 instances of reuse, followed by single use HDPE plastic bag (HPB). The global warming potential (excluding biogenic carbon) was 14, 81, 17 and 16 times higher for HDPE plastic, kraft paper, cotton woven and biodegradable polymer bags, respectively, when compared to PNB. Moreover, kraft paper or cotton woven bags demonstrated the highest negative impacts for the impact categories including abiotic fossil depletion, freshwater-, marineand terrestrial-ecotoxicities, human toxicity, acidification and eutrophication potentials. Further, sensitivity analysis indicated that the inflexion point for the PNB was minimum 4 reuses to avoid emission equivalent to the HPB. Singapore was adopted as the model city with confined waste management structure that imports most of the grocery bags, either as finished goods or as raw materials. Through comprehensive insights based on the new outlook of the integrated LCA model (cradle-to-grave) that included full-scale transportation component, the usage of the real case data from a city to develop the life cycle inventory, and consideration of the existing grocery bags options, the environmental assessment along with critical evaluation was conducted. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Life cycle assessment of food waste management options: a case study at campus level to foster sustainable campus
    Tunali, Merve
    Coban, Volkan
    Baban, Ahmet
    Ciliz, Nilguen Kiran
    ENERGY SOURCES PART A-RECOVERY UTILIZATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS, 2023, 45 (02) : 5481 - 5493
  • [32] Reliability-based life cycle assessment for future solid waste management alternatives in Portugal
    Ana Pires
    Ni-Bin Chang
    Graça Martinho
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2011, 16
  • [33] Evaluation of future food waste management alternatives in Istanbul from the life cycle assessment perspective
    Guven, Huseyin
    Wang, Zhao
    Eriksson, Ola
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 239
  • [34] Life cycle assessment for municipal solid waste management: a case study from Ahvaz, Iran
    Mohammad Amin Zarea
    Hadi Moazed
    Mehdi Ahmadmoazzam
    Sajede Malekghasemi
    Neemat Jaafarzadeh
    Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2019, 191
  • [35] Life cycle assessment for municipal solid waste management: a case study from Ahvaz, Iran
    Zarea, Mohammad Amin
    Moazed, Hadi
    Ahmadmoazzam, Mehdi
    Malekghasemi, Sajede
    Jaafarzadeh, Neemat
    ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2019, 191 (03)
  • [36] Life cycle assessment of composite packaging waste management—a Chinese case study on aseptic packaging
    Minghui Xie
    Qi Qiao
    Qihong Sun
    Linlin Zhang
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2013, 18 : 626 - 635
  • [37] Assessment of potential impacts of municipal solid waste treatment alternatives by using life cycle approach: a case study in Vietnam
    Nguyen Phuc Thanh
    Yasuhiro Matsui
    Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2013, 185 : 7993 - 8004
  • [38] Assessment of potential impacts of municipal solid waste treatment alternatives by using life cycle approach: a case study in Vietnam
    Nguyen Phuc Thanh
    Matsui, Yasuhiro
    ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2013, 185 (10) : 7993 - 8004
  • [39] A case study on the life cycle assessment of recycling industrial mercury-containing waste
    Qi, Congcong
    Ma, Xiaotian
    Wang, Meng
    Ye, Liping
    Yang, Yang
    Hong, Jinglan
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 161 : 382 - 389
  • [40] Life cycle assessment of e-waste management system in Australia: Case of waste printed circuit board (PCB)
    Islam, Md Tasbirul
    Iyer-Raniga, Usha
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2023, 418