Life cycle assessment of plastic grocery bags and their alternatives in cities with con fi ned waste management structure: A Singapore case study

被引:66
|
作者
Ahamed, Ashiq [1 ,2 ]
Vallam, Pramodh [3 ]
Iyer, Nikhil Shiva [4 ]
Veksha, Andrei [1 ]
Bobacka, Johan [2 ]
Lisak, Grzegorz [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Nanyang Technol Univ, Residues & Resource Reclamat Ctr, Nanyang Environm & Water Res Inst, 1 Cleantech Loop,CleanTech One, Singapore 637141, Singapore
[2] Abo Akad Univ, Lab Mol Sci & Engn, Johan Gadolin Proc Chem Ctr, FI-20500 Turku, Finland
[3] Nanyang Technol Univ, Nanyang Environm & Water Res Inst, 1 Cleantech Loop,CleanTech One, Singapore 637141, Singapore
[4] Nanyang Technol Univ, Sch Civil & Environm Engn, Singapore 639798, Singapore
关键词
LCA; Plastic; Environmental impacts; Global warming; Waste management; Grocery bags; MILLING FACTORIES; IMPACTS; ENERGY; BIODEGRADABILITY; POLLUTION; POLICIES; COTTON; PULP;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123956
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Plastic grocery bags are one of the most ubiquitous single-use packaging products. Recently, 'ecofriendly' options of plastic grocery bags have gained traction such as kraft paper, cotton, biodegradable, and reusable polypropylene non-woven bags. However, the impact of using various grocery bags in cities with dense population, well-developed infrastructure and thermal treatment as an end-of-life waste management option has been insufficiently documented. In this study, commonly found single-use (HDPE, biodegradable plastic, kraft paper) bags and reusable (cotton, polypropylene non-woven) bags were considered for the life cycle assessment (LCA). The usage characteristics (reusability, dimensions, carrying capacity) of bags, the production process (raw materials extraction, production processes), and emissions were determined as the significant factors contributing to the negative environmental im-pacts. In a model city with confined waste management, the assessment determined that the reusable polypropylene non-woven bag (PNB) caused the least overall negative environmental impacts when there are 50 instances of reuse, followed by single use HDPE plastic bag (HPB). The global warming potential (excluding biogenic carbon) was 14, 81, 17 and 16 times higher for HDPE plastic, kraft paper, cotton woven and biodegradable polymer bags, respectively, when compared to PNB. Moreover, kraft paper or cotton woven bags demonstrated the highest negative impacts for the impact categories including abiotic fossil depletion, freshwater-, marineand terrestrial-ecotoxicities, human toxicity, acidification and eutrophication potentials. Further, sensitivity analysis indicated that the inflexion point for the PNB was minimum 4 reuses to avoid emission equivalent to the HPB. Singapore was adopted as the model city with confined waste management structure that imports most of the grocery bags, either as finished goods or as raw materials. Through comprehensive insights based on the new outlook of the integrated LCA model (cradle-to-grave) that included full-scale transportation component, the usage of the real case data from a city to develop the life cycle inventory, and consideration of the existing grocery bags options, the environmental assessment along with critical evaluation was conducted. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Life cycle assessment of paper and plastic grocery bags used in Sri Lankan supermarkets
    P. Pitawala
    M. Danthurebandara
    L. Rajapaksha
    International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 2022, 19 : 11183 - 11198
  • [2] Life cycle assessment of paper and plastic grocery bags used in Sri Lankan supermarkets
    Pitawala, P.
    Danthurebandara, M.
    Rajapaksha, L.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 19 (11) : 11183 - 11198
  • [3] An Exploratory Comparative Life Cycle Assessment Study of Grocery Bags - Plastic, Paper, Non-woven and Woven Shopping bags
    Muthu, Subramanian Senthilkannan
    Li, Yi
    Hu, Jun-Yan
    Mok, Pik-Yin
    Liao, Xiao
    TEXTILE BIOENGINEERING AND INFORMATICS SYMPOSIUM PROCEEDINGS, VOLS 1-3, 2010, : 1603 - 1609
  • [4] Life Cycle Assessment of organic waste management strategies: an Italian case study
    Buratti, C.
    Barbanera, M.
    Testarmata, F.
    Fantozzi, F.
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2015, 89 : 125 - 136
  • [5] Comparative environmental and socioeconomic assessment on mixed plastic waste management: A Singapore case study
    Lee, Kevin Jia Le
    Wong, Sook Fun
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 893
  • [6] Life cycle assessment of construction and demolition waste management systems: a Spanish case study
    Mercante, Irma T.
    Bovea, Maria D.
    Ibanez-Fores, Valeria
    Arena, Alejandro P.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2012, 17 (02) : 232 - 241
  • [7] From Life Cycle Assessment to Life Cycle Management A Case Study on Industrial Waste Management Policy Making
    Fullana i Palmer, Pere
    Puig, Rita
    Bala, Alba
    Baquero, Grau
    Riba, Jordi
    Raugei, Marco
    JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 2011, 15 (03) : 458 - 475
  • [8] Life Cycle Assessment of the existing and proposed plastic waste management options in India: A case study
    Aryan, Yash
    Yadav, Pooja
    Samadder, Sukha Ranjan
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 211 : 1268 - 1283
  • [9] Life cycle assessment of plastic waste management in Mozambique
    dos Muchangos, Leticia Sarmento
    Ito, Lisa
    Tokai, Akihiro
    JOURNAL OF MATERIAL CYCLES AND WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2025, 27 (01) : 624 - 637
  • [10] Life Cycle Assessment of Asbestos Waste Management Scenarios: Case Study in Argentina
    Mercante, Irma
    Ojeda, Juan Pablo
    Alejandrino, Clarisa
    JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS TOXIC AND RADIOACTIVE WASTE, 2021, 25 (04)