Thulium vapoenucleation of prostates larger than 80 ml using a 1.9-μm and a 2-μm thulium laser

被引:0
|
作者
Netsch, C. [1 ]
Knoll, T. [2 ]
Gross, A. J. [1 ]
Wendt-Nordahl, G. [2 ]
机构
[1] Asklepios Klin Barmbek, Urol Abt, D-22291 Hamburg, Germany
[2] Urol Klin Sindelfingen, Urol Abt, Berlin, Germany
来源
UROLOGE | 2015年 / 54卷 / 10期
关键词
Micturition parameters; Prostate hyperplasia; Laser therapy; Length of stay; Catheterization time; TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION; LEARNING-CURVE; ENUCLEATION; COMPLICATIONS; ENLARGEMENT; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1007/s00120-014-3652-8
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background. Numerous studies have shown that thulium vapoenucleation of the prostate (ThuVEP) is a size-independent minimally invasive procedure for the treatment of benign prostatic enlargement. All ThuVEP series have been performed with a 2-mu m thulium laser device so far. The aim of this study was to evaluate the complications and early postoperative results of two thulium-devices with different wavelengths for ThuVEP in prostates larger than 80 ml. Materials and methods. A retrospective bi-centric matched-paired analysis with 296 patients was performed. Based on prostate size, 148 were matched at each centre and laser device, respectively. A 2-mu m (RevoLixA (R), LISA Laser products, Katlenburg, Germany n=148) and a 1.9-mu m (velaA (R) XL, starmedtec, Starnberg, Germany, n=148) thulium laser with a power output of 90 and 80 W was used. Patients' data were assessed and compared. Results. The median prostate volume (interquartile) was 100 ml (range 86.25-120 ml). At discharge, Qmax (preoperative 7.9 and 9 ml/s vs. postoperative 19.35 and 16.2 ml/s) and postvoiding-residual urine (preoperative 130 and 45 ml vs. postoperative 20 and 25 ml) were significantly improved after 2-mu m and 1.9-mu m ThuVEP (p < 0.001). The median catheterization time and hospitalization times were 2 and 4 days in both groups. Perioperative complications occurred in 89 patients (30.1%): Clavien 1 (12.2%), Clavien 2 (9.1%), Clavien 3a (0.7%), Clavien 3b (7.1%), and Clavien 4a (1%). Regarding the occurrence of complications, there were no differences between the two thulium devices. Conclusion. ThuVEP represents a safe and effective treatment for prostates larger than 80 ml. Both thulium laser devices give satisfactory immediate micturition improvement with low perioperative morbidity.
引用
收藏
页码:1414 / 1420
页数:7
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [11] Endoscopic Vaporesection of the Prostate Using the Continuous-Wave 2-μm Thulium Laser: Outcome and Demonstration of the Surgical Technique
    Szlauer, Roman
    Goetschl, Robert
    Razmaria, Aria
    Paras, Ljiljana
    Schmeller, Nikolaus T.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2009, 55 (02) : 368 - 375
  • [12] Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate versus thulium laser enucleation of the prostate for the treatment of large-volume prostates > 80 ml: 18-month follow-up results
    Zhang, Junjie
    Ou, Zhenyu
    Zhang, Xiaobo
    He, Wei
    Wang, Ruizhe
    Mo, Miao
    Chen, Lingxiao
    Xu, Ran
    Jiang, Shusuan
    Peng, Xiaoyan
    Qi, Lin
    Wang, Long
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 38 (06) : 1555 - 1562
  • [13] Laser transurethral resection of the prostate: Safety study of a novel system of photoselective vaporization with high power diode laser in prostates larger than 80 mL
    Andres, G.
    Arance, I.
    Gimbernat, H.
    Redondo, C.
    Garcia-Tello, A.
    Angulo, J. C.
    ACTAS UROLOGICAS ESPANOLAS, 2015, 39 (06): : 375 - 382
  • [14] High-power holmium laser versus thulium fiber laser for endoscopic enucleation of the prostate in patients with glands larger than 80 ml: Results from the Prostate Endoscopic EnucLeation study group
    Lim, Ee Jean
    Castellani, Daniele
    Somani, Bhaskar K.
    Gokce, Mehmet I.
    Fong, Khi Yung
    Sancha, Fernando G.
    Herrmann, Thomas R. W.
    Biligere, Sarvajit
    Tursunkulov, Azimdjon N.
    Dellabella, Marco
    Sofer, Mario
    Enikeev, Dmitry
    Petov, Vladislav
    Gadzhiev, Nariman
    Elterman, Dean
    Mahajan, Abhay
    Socarras, Moises R.
    Yunusov, Dilmurod S.
    Nasirov, Furkat
    Teoh, Jeremy Y. C.
    Gauhar, Vineet
    PROSTATE INTERNATIONAL, 2024, 12 (01) : 40 - 45
  • [15] Thulium:YAG 2 μm cw laser prostatectomy: where do we stand?
    Bach, T.
    Xia, S. J.
    Yang, Y.
    Mattioli, S.
    Watson, G. M.
    Gross, A. J.
    Herrmann, T. R. W.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 28 (02) : 163 - 168
  • [16] Impact of 120-W 2-μm continuous wave laser vapoenucleation of the prostate on sexual function
    Wang, Yubin
    Shao, Jinkai
    Lu, Yongning
    Lu, Yongan
    Li, Xiaodong
    LASERS IN MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2014, 29 (02) : 689 - 693
  • [17] Use of the 2-μm Continuous Wave Thulium Laser for the Resection of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinomas Does not Impair Pathological Assessment
    Pothen, Ajit J.
    Evenboer, Januska
    Swartz, Justin E.
    Willems, Stefan M.
    Van Cann, Ellen M.
    Janssen, Luuk M.
    van der Heijden, Geert J.
    Grolman, Wilko
    LASERS IN SURGERY AND MEDICINE, 2014, 46 (08) : 608 - 613
  • [18] Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Treatment by Transurethral Enucleation of the Prostate Using a 2-μm Laser
    He-Qing Guo
    Gao-Biao Zhou
    Hong-Ming Liu
    Bin Sun
    Guang-Xin Pan
    Da-Wei Mu
    Jing-Ming Yan
    Ji-Zhang Xing
    Di Li
    Quan Hong
    Indian Journal of Surgery, 2015, 77 : 1073 - 1076
  • [19] Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Treatment by Transurethral Enucleation of the Prostate Using a 2-μm Laser
    Guo, He-Qing
    Zhou, Gao-Biao
    Liu, Hong-Ming
    Sun, Bin
    Pan, Guang-Xin
    Mu, Da-Wei
    Yan, Jing-Ming
    Xing, Ji-Zhang
    Li, Di
    Hong, Quan
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2015, 77 : S1073 - S1076
  • [20] 70 vs 120 W thulium:yttrium-aluminium-garnet 2 μm continuous-wave laser for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic ex-vivo evaluation
    Bach, Thorsten
    Huck, Nina
    Wezel, Felix
    Haecker, Axel
    Gross, Andreas J.
    Michel, Maurice Stephan
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2010, 106 (03) : 368 - 371