Impact of corporate strengths/weaknesses on project management competencies

被引:58
作者
Isik, Zeynep [1 ]
Arditi, David [1 ]
Dikmen, Irem [2 ]
Birgonul, M. Talat [2 ]
机构
[1] IIT, Dept Civil Architectural & Environm Engn, Chicago, IL 60616 USA
[2] Middle E Tech Univ, Dept Civil Engn, TR-06531 Ankara, Turkey
关键词
Corporate strengths/weaknesses; Project management competencies; Company resources and capabilities; Strategic decisions; Strength of relationships; RISK MANAGEMENT; PERFORMANCE; LEADERSHIP; SUCCESS; SATISFACTION; PERCEPTIONS; INNOVATION; RESOURCES; STRATEGY; SUPPORT;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijproman.2008.10.002
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
The project is at the core of the construction business. Project management can be used as a tool to maximize the success of projects and ultimately the success of construction companies. It is therefore worthwhile to explore the factors that can enhance project management competencies. In this study, it was hypothesized that "project management competencies" are influenced by "corporate strengths/weaknesses". "Corporate strengths/weaknesses" was defined as a second-ordered construct composed of three latent variables including the company's resources and capabilities, its strategic decisions, and the strength of its relationships with other parties. The data obtained from a questionnaire survey administered to 73 contractors were analyzed using structural equation modeling (SEM). The results of the study verified the hypothesis suggested. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd and IPMA. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:629 / 637
页数:9
相关论文
共 83 条
[1]   ANALYSIS OF CLIENT-SATISFACTION FACTORS IN CONSTRUCTION-INDUSTRY [J].
AHMED, SM ;
KANGARI, R .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT IN ENGINEERING, 1995, 11 (02) :36-44
[2]   STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE - A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED 2-STEP APPROACH [J].
ANDERSON, JC ;
GERBING, DW .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1988, 103 (03) :411-423
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2004, GUID PROJ MAN BOD KN
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1994, COMPETITIVE ADVANTAG
[5]   Innovation in construction equipment and its flow into the construction industry [J].
Arditi, D ;
Kale, S ;
Tangkar, M .
JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT-ASCE, 1997, 123 (04) :371-378
[6]  
Arditi D., 2003, CONSTR MANAG ECON, V21, P175, DOI 10.1080/0144619032000079716
[7]   THE LINK BETWEEN BUSINESS STRATEGY AND INDUSTRIAL-RELATIONS SYSTEMS IN AMERICAN STEEL MINIMILLS [J].
ARTHUR, JB .
INDUSTRIAL & LABOR RELATIONS REVIEW, 1992, 45 (03) :488-506
[8]  
Atkinson R., 1999, International Journal of Project Management, V17, P337, DOI [DOI 10.1016/S0263-7863(98)00069-6, 10.1016/S0263-7863(98)00069-6]
[9]   FIRM RESOURCES AND SUSTAINED COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE [J].
BARNEY, J .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 1991, 17 (01) :99-120
[10]  
Beatham S., 2004, BENCHMARKING, V11, P93, DOI DOI 10.1108/14635770410520320