Assessing Clinical Reasoning in Pediatric Emergency Medicine: Validity Evidence for a Script Concordance Test

被引:53
作者
Carriere, Benoit [1 ]
Gagnon, Robert [2 ]
Charlin, Bernard [2 ]
Downing, Steven [3 ]
Bordage, Georges [3 ]
机构
[1] CHU Ste Justine, Dept Pediat, Sect Pediat Emergency Med, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[2] Univ Montreal, Off Med Educ, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[3] Univ Illinois, Dept Med Educ, Chicago, IL USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.annemergmed.2008.07.024
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Study objective: Clinical reasoning is a crucial skill for all residents to acquire during their training. During most patient encounters in pediatric emergency medicine, physicians and trainees are challenged by diagnostic, investigative, and treatment uncertainties. The Script Concordance Test may provide a means to assess reasoning skills in the context of uncertainty in the practice of pediatric emergency medicine. We gathered validity evidence for the use of a pediatric emergency medicine Script Concordance Test to evaluate residents' reasoning skills. Methods: A 1-hour test containing 60 questions nested in 38 cases was administered to 53 residents at the end of their pediatric emergency medicine rotation at 1 academic institution. Twelve experienced pediatricians were part of a reference panel to establish the basis for the scoring process. Results: An optimized version of the test, based on positive item discrimination data, contained 30 cases and 50 questions. Scores ranged from 48% to 82%, with a mean score of 69.9 (SD=11.5). The reliability of the optimized test (Cronbach's alpha) was 0.77. Performance on the test increased as the level of experience of the residents increased. The residents considered the Script Concordance Test true to real-life clinical problems and had enough time to complete the test. Conclusion: This pediatric emergency medicine Script Concordance Test was reliable and useful to assess the progression of clinical reasoning during residency training. [Ann Emerg Med. 2009;53:647-652.]
引用
收藏
页码:647 / 652
页数:6
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
Bandiera GW, 2002, ACAD EMERG MED, V9, P889, DOI 10.1197/aemj.9.9.889
[2]   Measurement of clinical reflective capacity early in training as a predictor of clinical reasoning performance at the end of residency:: an experimental study on the script concordance test [J].
Brailovsky, C ;
Charlin, B ;
Beausoleil, S ;
Coté, S ;
Van der Vleuten, C .
MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2001, 35 (05) :430-436
[3]   Measurement of perception and interpretation skills during radiology training: utility of the script concordance approach [J].
Brazeau-Lamontagne, L ;
Charlin, B ;
Gagnon, R ;
Samson, L ;
van der Vleuten, C .
MEDICAL TEACHER, 2004, 26 (04) :326-332
[4]   Self-assessment for neurosurgery residents by script concordance test (SCT). The process of test elaboration [J].
Caire, F ;
Sol, JC ;
Moreau, JJ ;
Isidori, P ;
Charlin, B .
NEUROCHIRURGIE, 2004, 50 (01) :66-72
[5]   The Script Concordance test: A tool to assess the reflective clinician [J].
Charlin, B ;
Roy, L ;
Brailovsky, C ;
Goulet, F ;
van der Vleuten, C .
TEACHING AND LEARNING IN MEDICINE, 2000, 12 (04) :189-195
[6]   Standardized assessment of reasoning in contexts of uncertainty - The script concordance approach [J].
Charlin, B ;
Van Der Vleuten, C .
EVALUATION & THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS, 2004, 27 (03) :304-319
[7]   Comparison of an aggregate scoring method with a consensus scoring method in a measure of clinical reasoning capacity [J].
Charlin, B ;
Desaulniers, M ;
Gagnon, R ;
Blouin, D ;
van der Vleuten, C .
TEACHING AND LEARNING IN MEDICINE, 2002, 14 (03) :150-156
[8]  
CHARLIN B, 2002, THESIS U MAASTRICHT
[9]   Scripts and clinical reasoning [J].
Charlin, Bernard ;
Boshuizen, Henny P. A. ;
Custers, Eugene J. ;
Feltovich, Paul J. .
MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2007, 41 (12) :1178-1184
[10]  
Charter M, 1998, ENVIRONM EDUC COMMUN, V3, P51