Efficacy and tolerability of montelukast alone or in combination with loratadine in seasonal allergic rhinitis: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial performed in the fall

被引:152
|
作者
Nayak, AS
Philip, G
Lu, S
Malice, MP
Reiss, TF
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Coll Med, Peoria, IL 61656 USA
[2] Merck Res Labs, Rahway, NJ USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S1081-1206(10)61891-1
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background: Histamine and cysteinyl leukotrienes seem to be important mediators of allergic rhinitis. Objective: This multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled trial evaluated the effectiveness and tolerability of montelukast, loratadine, and combination therapy with montelukast and loratadine for treating patients with fall seasonal allergic rhinitis. Methods: After a 1-week, single-blind, placebo run-in period, 907 male and female patients aged 15 to 82 years were randomized to 1 of 4 treatments: montelukast 10 mg (n = 155), loratadine 10 mg (n = 301), combination montelukast 10 mg and loratadine 10 mg (n = 302), or placebo (n = 149), administered once daily at bedtime for 2 weeks. The primary endpoint was the daytime nasal symptoms score (mean of congestion, rhinorrhea, pruritus, and sneezing). Results: Mean symptom scores at baseline were similar for the four treatment groups. For each of the three active treatments, the difference was significant for the mean change from baseline compared with placebo (P less than or equal to 0.001). However, the effect of montelukast/loratadine compared with loratadine alone, the primary comparison, was not significantly different. Differences for each therapy alone compared with placebo were also significant for most secondary endpoints, including nighttime symptom scores, eye symptoms scores, and rhinitis-specific quality of life. Differences for montelukast/loratadine compared with each therapy alone generally showed numerical superiority, and a few endpoints showed differences that were statistically significant. All active treatments showed a safety profile generally similar to placebo. Conclusions: Montelukast alone or in combination with loratadine is well tolerated and provides clinical and quality-of-life benefits for patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis.
引用
收藏
页码:592 / 600
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Montelukast for treating seasonal allergic rhinitis: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial performed in the spring
    Philip, G
    Malmstrom, K
    Hampel, FC
    Weinstein, SF
    LaForce, CF
    Ratner, PH
    Malice, MP
    Reiss, TF
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL ALLERGY, 2002, 32 (07): : 1020 - 1028
  • [2] Improvement in rhinoconjunctivitis quality of life outcomes in the treatment of fall allergic rhinitis by montelukast alone or in combination with loratadine in a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study
    Philip, G
    Malmstrom, K
    Nayak, AS
    Malice, MP
    Reiss, TF
    JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2001, 107 (02) : S158 - S158
  • [3] Concomitant montelukast and loratadine as treatment for seasonal allergic rhinitis: A randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial
    Meltzer, EO
    Malmstrom, K
    Lu, S
    Prenner, BM
    Wei, LX
    Weinstein, SF
    Wolfe, JD
    Reiss, TF
    JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2000, 105 (05) : 917 - 922
  • [4] MULTICENTER, DOUBLE-BLIND, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED TRIAL OF TERFENADINE IN SEASONAL ALLERGIC RHINITIS AND CONJUNCTIVITIS
    KEMP, JP
    BUCKLEY, CE
    GERSHWIN, ME
    BUCHMAN, E
    CASCIO, FL
    CHRETIEN, JH
    FOSTER, TS
    GORDON, WE
    JAKLE, C
    KLEMAWESCH, SJ
    WEINER, DL
    WILLE, LJ
    TSAI, TH
    ANNALS OF ALLERGY, 1985, 54 (06): : 502 - 509
  • [5] Montelukast for treating seasonal allergic rhinitis: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial performed in the spring (vol 32, pg 1020, 2002)
    Philip, G.
    Malmstrom, K.
    Hampel, F. C., Jr.
    Weinstein, S. F.
    LaForce, C. F.
    Ratner, P. H.
    Malice, M-P.
    Reiss, T. F.
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL ALLERGY, 2009, 39 (10): : 1622 - 1622
  • [6] Reduction of eosinophil counts by montelukast in double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled studies of seasonal allergic rhinitis
    Ritter, S
    Philip, G
    Hampel, FC
    Malmstrom, K
    Malice, MP
    Reiss, TF
    JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2002, 109 (01) : S240 - S240
  • [7] Efficacy and safety of rupatadine in Japanese patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis: A double-blind, randomized, multicenter, placebo-controlled clinical trial
    Okubo, Kimihiro
    Suzuki, Takamasa
    Tanaka, Ayaka
    Aoki, Hiroshi
    ALLERGOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 68 (02) : 207 - 215
  • [8] A multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial comparing the efficacy and tolerability of levocabastine-oxymetazoline nasal spray with levocabastine and oxymetazoline alone in the symptomatic treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis
    Busse, W
    Janssens, M
    Eisen, G
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RHINOLOGY, 1996, 10 (02): : 105 - 111
  • [9] DOUBLE-BLIND PLACEBO-CONTROLLED STUDY OF LORATADINE, MEQUITAZINE, AND PLACEBO IN THE SYMPTOMATIC TREATMENT OF SEASONAL ALLERGIC RHINITIS
    SKASSABROCIEK, W
    BOUSQUET, J
    MONTES, F
    VERDIER, M
    SCHWAB, D
    LHERMINIER, M
    MICHEL, FB
    JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 1988, 81 (04) : 725 - 730
  • [10] Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of montelukast for treating perennial allergic rhinitis
    Patel, P
    Philip, G
    Yang, W
    Call, R
    Horak, F
    LaForce, C
    Gilles, L
    Garrett, GC
    Dass, SB
    Knorr, BA
    Reiss, TF
    ANNALS OF ALLERGY ASTHMA & IMMUNOLOGY, 2005, 95 (06) : 551 - 557