共 50 条
A systematic review of the measurement properties of the Body Image Scale (BIS) in cancer patients
被引:45
作者:
Melissant, Heleen C.
[1
,2
]
Neijenhuijs, Koen I.
[1
,2
]
Jansen, Femke
[2
,3
]
Aaronson, Neil K.
[4
]
Groenvold, Mogens
[5
,6
]
Holzner, Bernhard
[7
]
Terwee, Caroline B.
[8
]
van Uden-Kraan, Cornelia F.
[1
,2
]
Cuijpers, Pim
[1
]
Verdonck-de Leeuw, Irma M.
[1
,2
,3
]
机构:
[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam Publ Hlth Res Inst, Fac Behav & Movement Sci, Dept Clin Neuro & Dev Psychol, van der Boechorststr 1, NL-1081 BT Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Vrije Univ Amsterdam Med Ctr, CCA, De Boelelaan 1118, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Vrije Univ Amsterdam Med Ctr, Amsterdam Publ Hlth Res Inst, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, De Boelelaan 1117, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Netherlands Canc Inst, Div Psychosocial Res & Epidemiol, Plesmanlaan 121, NL-1066 CX Amsterdam, Netherlands
[5] Copenhagen Univ Hosp, Bispebjerg Hosp, Dept Palliat Med, Res Unit, 20D,Bispebjerg Bakke 23, DK-2400 Copenhagen NV, Denmark
[6] Univ Copenhagen, Dept Publ Hlth, Oster Farimagsgade 5, DK-1014 Copenhagen, Denmark
[7] Med Univ Innsbruck, Dept Psychiat Psychotherapy & Psychosomat, Anichstr 35, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria
[8] Univ Med Ctr, Amsterdam Publ Hlth Res Inst, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, De Boelelaan 1089a, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词:
Cancer;
Body image;
PROM;
Systematic review;
Measurement properties;
Body Image Scale;
REPORTED OUTCOME MEASURES;
BREAST-CANCER;
PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES;
METHODOLOGICAL QUALITY;
APPLICATION ONCOKOMPAS;
EHEALTH APPLICATION;
COSMIN;
VALIDITY;
SURGERY;
WOMEN;
D O I:
10.1007/s00520-018-4145-x
中图分类号:
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号:
100214 ;
摘要:
Body image is acknowledged as an important aspect of health-related quality of life in cancer patients. The Body Image Scale (BIS) is a patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) to evaluate body image in cancer patients. The aim of this study was to systematically review measurement properties of the BIS among cancer patients. A search in Embase, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Web of Science was performed to identify studies that investigated measurement properties of the BIS (Prospero ID 42017057237). Study quality was assessed (excellent, good, fair, poor), and data were extracted and analyzed according to the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) methodology on structural validity, internal consistency, reliability, measurement error, hypothesis testing for construct validity, and responsiveness. Evidence was categorized into sufficient, insufficient, inconsistent, or indeterminate. Nine studies were included. Evidence was sufficient for structural validity (one factor solution), internal consistency (alpha = 0.86-0.96), and reliability (r > 0.70); indeterminate for measurement error (information on minimal important change lacked) and responsiveness (increasing body image disturbance in only one study); and inconsistent for hypothesis testing (conflicting results). Quality of the evidence was moderate to low. No studies reported on cross-cultural validity. The BIS is a PROM with good structural validity, internal consistency, and test-retest reliability, but good quality studies on the other measurement properties are needed to optimize evidence. It is recommended to include a wider variety of cancer diagnoses and treatment modalities in these future studies.
引用
收藏
页码:1715 / 1726
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条