A systematic review of the measurement properties of the Body Image Scale (BIS) in cancer patients

被引:42
|
作者
Melissant, Heleen C. [1 ,2 ]
Neijenhuijs, Koen I. [1 ,2 ]
Jansen, Femke [2 ,3 ]
Aaronson, Neil K. [4 ]
Groenvold, Mogens [5 ,6 ]
Holzner, Bernhard [7 ]
Terwee, Caroline B. [8 ]
van Uden-Kraan, Cornelia F. [1 ,2 ]
Cuijpers, Pim [1 ]
Verdonck-de Leeuw, Irma M. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam Publ Hlth Res Inst, Fac Behav & Movement Sci, Dept Clin Neuro & Dev Psychol, van der Boechorststr 1, NL-1081 BT Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Vrije Univ Amsterdam Med Ctr, CCA, De Boelelaan 1118, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Vrije Univ Amsterdam Med Ctr, Amsterdam Publ Hlth Res Inst, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, De Boelelaan 1117, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Netherlands Canc Inst, Div Psychosocial Res & Epidemiol, Plesmanlaan 121, NL-1066 CX Amsterdam, Netherlands
[5] Copenhagen Univ Hosp, Bispebjerg Hosp, Dept Palliat Med, Res Unit, 20D,Bispebjerg Bakke 23, DK-2400 Copenhagen NV, Denmark
[6] Univ Copenhagen, Dept Publ Hlth, Oster Farimagsgade 5, DK-1014 Copenhagen, Denmark
[7] Med Univ Innsbruck, Dept Psychiat Psychotherapy & Psychosomat, Anichstr 35, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria
[8] Univ Med Ctr, Amsterdam Publ Hlth Res Inst, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, De Boelelaan 1089a, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Cancer; Body image; PROM; Systematic review; Measurement properties; Body Image Scale; REPORTED OUTCOME MEASURES; BREAST-CANCER; PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES; METHODOLOGICAL QUALITY; APPLICATION ONCOKOMPAS; EHEALTH APPLICATION; COSMIN; VALIDITY; SURGERY; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1007/s00520-018-4145-x
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Body image is acknowledged as an important aspect of health-related quality of life in cancer patients. The Body Image Scale (BIS) is a patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) to evaluate body image in cancer patients. The aim of this study was to systematically review measurement properties of the BIS among cancer patients. A search in Embase, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Web of Science was performed to identify studies that investigated measurement properties of the BIS (Prospero ID 42017057237). Study quality was assessed (excellent, good, fair, poor), and data were extracted and analyzed according to the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) methodology on structural validity, internal consistency, reliability, measurement error, hypothesis testing for construct validity, and responsiveness. Evidence was categorized into sufficient, insufficient, inconsistent, or indeterminate. Nine studies were included. Evidence was sufficient for structural validity (one factor solution), internal consistency (alpha = 0.86-0.96), and reliability (r > 0.70); indeterminate for measurement error (information on minimal important change lacked) and responsiveness (increasing body image disturbance in only one study); and inconsistent for hypothesis testing (conflicting results). Quality of the evidence was moderate to low. No studies reported on cross-cultural validity. The BIS is a PROM with good structural validity, internal consistency, and test-retest reliability, but good quality studies on the other measurement properties are needed to optimize evidence. It is recommended to include a wider variety of cancer diagnoses and treatment modalities in these future studies.
引用
收藏
页码:1715 / 1726
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A systematic review of the measurement properties of the Body Image Scale (BIS) in cancer patients
    Heleen C. Melissant
    Koen I. Neijenhuijs
    Femke Jansen
    Neil K. Aaronson
    Mogens Groenvold
    Bernhard Holzner
    Caroline B. Terwee
    Cornelia F. van Uden-Kraan
    Pim Cuijpers
    Irma M. Verdonck-de Leeuw
    Supportive Care in Cancer, 2018, 26 : 1715 - 1726
  • [2] The Portuguese version of the Body Image Scale (BIS) - psychometric properties in a sample of breast cancer patients
    Moreira, Helena
    Silva, Sonia
    Marques, Andreia
    Canavarro, Maria Cristina
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY NURSING, 2010, 14 (02) : 111 - 118
  • [3] Instruments for Measuring the Burden of Family Caregivers of Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review of Measurement Properties
    Zhou, Yue
    Zhang, Jie
    Pan, Yufan
    Dai, Yu
    Sun, Yujian
    Xiao, Yi
    Tang, Fuyou
    Yu, Yufeng
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2024,
  • [4] Effect of eHealth Interventions on Body Image of Patients With Cancer: Systematic Review
    Huang, Guohong
    Wu, Rongrong
    Xu, Xiuzhi
    Song, Yongxia
    Zheng, Rong
    Chen, Xi
    Hong, Jingfang
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2025, 27
  • [5] Psychometric Properties of the Body Image Scale in Turkish Ostomy Patients
    Karayurt, Ozgul
    Edeer, Aylin Durmaz
    Suler, Gulseren
    Dorum, Hatice
    Harputlu, Deniz
    Vural, Fatma
    Ucer, Ceylanim
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING KNOWLEDGE, 2015, 26 (03) : 127 - 134
  • [6] A systematic review of the measurement properties of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer In-patient Satisfaction with Care Questionnaire, the EORTC IN-PATSAT32
    Neijenhuijs, Koen I.
    Jansen, Femke
    Aaronson, Neil K.
    Bredart, Anne
    Groenvold, Mogens
    Holzner, Bernhard
    Terwee, Caroline B.
    Cuijpers, Pim
    Verdonck-de Leeuw, Irma M.
    SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2018, 26 (08) : 2551 - 2560
  • [7] PROMs for Pain in Adult Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review of Measurement Properties
    Abahussin, Asma A.
    West, Robert M.
    Wong, David C.
    Ziegler, Lucy E.
    PAIN PRACTICE, 2019, 19 (01) : 93 - 117
  • [8] Body image and cancer-related lymphoedema: A systematic review
    Byrne, Emma
    Gaffey, Jane
    Hayden, Lucy
    Daly, Adam
    Gallagher, Pamela
    Dunne, Simon
    PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2023, 32 (10) : 1528 - 1538
  • [9] The Spanish version of the Body Image Scale (S-BIS): psychometric properties in a sample of breast and gynaecological cancer patients
    Gomez-Campelo, Paloma
    Bragado-Alvarez, Carmen
    Jose Hernandez-Lloreda, M.
    Luisa Sanchez-Bernardos, M.
    SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2015, 23 (02) : 473 - 481
  • [10] Systematic review of body image measures
    Kling, Johanna
    Kwakkenbos, Linda
    Diedrichs, Phillippa C.
    Rumsey, Nichola
    Frisen, Ann
    Brandao, Maria Piedade
    Silva, Anabela G.
    Dooley, Barbara
    Rodgers, Rachel F.
    Fitzgerald, Amanda
    BODY IMAGE, 2019, 30 : 170 - 211