Cross-cultural values and management preferences in protected areas of Norway and Poland

被引:39
|
作者
Brown, Greg [1 ]
Hausner, Vera Helene [2 ]
Grodzinska-Jurczak, Malgorzata [3 ]
Pietrzyk-Kaszynska, Agata [4 ]
Olszanska, Agnieszka [4 ]
Peek, Barbara [4 ]
Rechcinski, Marcin [5 ]
Laegreid, Eiliv [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Sch Geog Planning & Environm Management, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia
[2] Arctic Univ Norway, Dept Arctic & Marine Biol, Tromso, Norway
[3] Jagiellonian Univ, Inst Environm Sci, PL-31007 Krakow, Poland
[4] Polish Acad Sci, Inst Nat Conservat, PL-00901 Warsaw, Poland
[5] Jagiellonian Univ, Inst Geog & Spatial Planning, PL-31007 Krakow, Poland
关键词
Cross-cultural; Ecosystem values; PPGIS; Protected areas; Conservation; Public participation; PUBLIC-PARTICIPATION GIS; NATURE CONSERVATION; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; LAND-USE; BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION; LANDSCAPE VALUES; SOCIAL VALUES; NATIONAL-PARK; GOVERNANCE; PPGIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jnc.2015.09.006
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Protected areas provide important ecosystem services globally but few studies have examined how cultural differences influence the distribution of cultural ecosystem values and management preferences. We used internet-based public participation GIS (PPGIS) in the countries of Norway and Poland to identify ecosystem values and management preferences in protected areas held by regional residents and site users. We found significant differences in the type and quantity of ecosystem values with Norwegians mapping more values relating to use of resources (e.g., hunting/fishing, gathering) and Polish respondents mapping more environmental values such as scenery, biological diversity, and water quality. With respect to management preferences, Norwegians identified more preferences for resource utilization while Polish respondents identified more preferences for conservation. Norwegian respondents were more satisfied with protected area management and local participation which can be explained by historical, legal, and cultural differences between the two countries. For Norway, biodiversity conservation in protected areas will continue to be guided by sustainable use of protected areas, rather than strict nature protection, with management favoring local board control and active public participation. For Poland, change in protected area management to enhance biodiversity conservation is less certain, driven by national environmental values that conflict with local values and preferences, continuing distrust in government, and low levels of civic participation. Differential efficacy in PPGIS methods Norway with greater participation from household sampling and Poland with greater response using social media suggest different strategies will be required for effective public engagement in protected area planning and management. (C) 2015 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:89 / 104
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Effects of land tenure and protected areas on ecosystem services and land use preferences in Norway
    Hausner, Vera Helene
    Brown, Greg
    Laegreid, Eiliv
    LAND USE POLICY, 2015, 49 : 446 - 461
  • [2] Do Protected Areas Contribute to Health and Well-Being? A Cross-Cultural Comparison
    Jiricka-Puerrer, Alexandra
    Tadini, Valeria
    Salak, Boris
    Taczanowska, Karolina
    Tucki, Andrzej
    Senes, Giulio
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2019, 16 (07)
  • [3] Boundary management preferences from a gender and cross-cultural perspective
    Allen, Tammy
    Beham, Barbara
    Ollier-Malaterre, Ariane
    Baierl, Andreas
    Alexandrova, Matilda
    Artiawati
    Beauregard, Alexandra
    Carvalho, Vania Sofia
    Chambel, Maria Jose
    Cho, Eunae
    da Silva, Bruna Coden
    Dawkins, Sarah
    Escribano, Pablo
    Gudeta, Konjit Hailu
    Huang, Ting-pang
    Jaga, Ameeta
    Kost, Dominique
    Kurowska, Anna
    Leon, Emmanuelle
    Lewis, Suzan
    Lu, Chang-qin
    Martin, Angela
    Morandin, Gabriele
    Noboa, Fabrizio
    Offer, Shira
    Ohu, Eugene
    Peters, Pascale
    Rajadhyaksha, Ujvala
    Russo, Marcello
    Sohn, Young Woo
    Straub, Caroline
    Tammelin, Mia
    Van Engen, Marloes
    Waismel-Manor, Ronit
    JOURNAL OF VOCATIONAL BEHAVIOR, 2024, 148
  • [4] Values and the resolution of cross-cultural conflicts
    Ojelabi, Lola Akin
    GLOBAL CHANGE PEACE & SECURITY, 2010, 22 (01) : 53 - 73
  • [5] Cultural values and important possessions: a cross-cultural analysis
    Watson, J
    Lysonski, S
    Gillan, T
    Raymore, L
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2002, 55 (11) : 923 - 931
  • [6] Going Global: Rethinking the Cross-Cultural Transfer of Minimal Impact Education Programs in Protected Areas
    Serenari, Christopher
    Leung, Yu-Fai
    JOURNAL OF PARK AND RECREATION ADMINISTRATION, 2013, 31 (02) : 61 - 75
  • [7] Cross-Cultural Applications of the New Ecological Paradigm in Protected Area Contexts
    Dorward, Leejiah
    Ibbett, Harriet
    Dwiyahreni, Asri A.
    Kohi, Edward
    Prayitno, Karlina
    Sankeni, Stephen
    Kaduma, Joseph
    Mawenya, Rose
    Mchomvu, Jesca
    Sabiladiyni, Humairah
    Saputra, Andie Wijaya
    Supriatna, Jatna
    Trywidiarini, Tyassanti
    St John, Freya A. V.
    ENVIRONMENT AND BEHAVIOR, 2024, 56 (1-2) : 120 - 151
  • [8] Managing cultural values in sustainable tourism: Conflicts in protected areas
    Zeppel, Heather
    TOURISM AND HOSPITALITY RESEARCH, 2010, 10 (02) : 93 - 104
  • [9] Co-management of protected areas to alleviate conservation conflicts: experiences in Norway
    Fedreheim, Gunn Elin
    Blanco, Ester
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE COMMONS, 2017, 11 (02): : 754 - 773
  • [10] Cross-scale feedbacks and scale mismatches as influences on cultural services and the resilience of protected areas
    Maciejewski, Kristine
    De Vos, Alta
    Cumming, Graeme S.
    Moore, Christine
    Biggs, Duan
    ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2015, 25 (01) : 11 - 23