High percent tumor volume predicts biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy in pathological stage T3a prostate cancer with a negative surgical margin

被引:13
作者
You, Dalsan [1 ]
Jeong, In Gab [1 ]
Song, Cheryn [1 ]
Cho, Yong Mee [2 ]
Hong, Jun Hyuk [1 ]
Kim, Choung-Soo [1 ]
Ahn, Hanjong [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ulsan, Coll Med, Asan Med Ctr, Dept Urol, Seoul 138736, South Korea
[2] Univ Ulsan, Coll Med, Asan Med Ctr, Dept Pathol, Seoul 138736, South Korea
关键词
tumor volume; prostate cancer; surgical margins; prostatectomy; biochemical recurrence; POSTOPERATIVE RADIOTHERAPY; PROGNOSTIC-SIGNIFICANCE; DISEASE RECURRENCE; HIGH-RISK; MEN; PROGRESSION; LOCATION;
D O I
10.1111/iju.12348
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives To evaluate the impact of percent tumor volume and surgical margin status on biochemical recurrence in pT3-T4 prostate cancer. Methods A total of 397 patients who had pT3-T4N0 diseases and did not receive neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy were included for analysis. Results In the entire cohort, prostate-specific antigen (per 1 ng/mL increase; hazard ratio 1.019; P = 0.002), pathological stage (T3b-T4 vs T3a; hazard ratio 2.283; P < 0.001), Gleason score (>= 8 vs <= 6; hazard ratio 5.290; P = 0.005), surgical margin status (multiple positive vs negative; hazard ratio 1.839; P = 0.003) and lymphovascular invasion (present vs absent; hazard ratio 1.641; P = 0.008) were independent predictors of recurrence. Percent tumor volume was an independent predictor of recurrence in T3a diseases with negative surgical margins. In analysis using receiver operating characteristic curve, a threshold of 12% showed the best balance of sensitivity and specificity, 66% and 67%, respectively. The 5-year recurrence-free survival rates of pT3a diseases with negative surgical margin were 85.2% for percent tumor volume <= 12% and 57.7% for percent tumor volume >12% (P < 0.001). Patients with pT3a with negative surgical margins and percent tumor volume >12% showed comparable 5-year recurrence-free survival rate compared with those with pT3a with positive surgical margin (57.7% vs 57.6%; P = 0.763). Conclusions Despite having less impact on recurrence than other clinicopathological variables in pT3-T4 prostate cancer, percent tumor volume can further improve recurrence risk stratification in pT3a diseases with negative surgical margins.
引用
收藏
页码:484 / 489
页数:6
相关论文
共 30 条
[21]  
STAMEY TA, 1993, CANCER, V71, P933, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19930201)71:3+<933::AID-CNCR2820711408>3.0.CO
[22]  
2-L
[23]   Biological determinants of cancer progression in men with prostate cancer [J].
Stamey, TA ;
McNeal, JE ;
Yemoto, CM ;
Sigal, BM ;
Johnstone, IM .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1999, 281 (15) :1395-1400
[24]   Do margins matter? The prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens (Reprinted from The Journal of Urology, vol 174, pg 903-907, 2005) [J].
Swindle, Peter ;
Eastham, James A. ;
Ohori, Makoto ;
Kattan, Michael W. ;
Wheeler, Thomas ;
Maru, Norio ;
Slawin, Kevin ;
Scardino, Peter T. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2008, 179 (05) :S47-S51
[25]   Tumor volume as a predictor of adverse pathologic features and biochemical recurrence (BCR) in radical prostatectomy specimens: A tale of two methods [J].
Thompson, Ian M., III ;
Salem, Shady ;
Chang, Sam S. ;
Clark, Peter E. ;
Davis, Rodney ;
Herrell, S. Duke ;
Kordan, Yakup ;
Baumgartner, Roxelyn ;
Phillips, Sharon ;
Smith, Joseph A. ;
Cookson, Michael S. ;
Barocas, Daniel A. .
WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2011, 29 (01) :15-20
[26]   Tumor Percent Involvement Predicts Prostate Specific Antigen Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy Only in Men With Smaller Prostate [J].
Uhlman, Matthew A. ;
Sun, Leon ;
Stackhouse, Danielle A. ;
Polascik, Thomas J. ;
Mouraviev, Valdmir ;
Robertson, Cary N. ;
Albala, David M. ;
Moul, Judd W. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 183 (03) :997-1001
[27]   Identification of patients with prostate cancer who benefit from immediate postoperative radiotherapy:: EORTC 22911 [J].
Van der Kwast, Theodorus H. ;
Bolla, Michel ;
Van Poppel, Hein ;
Van Cangh, Paul ;
Vekemans, Kris ;
Da Pozzo, Luigi ;
Bosset, Jean-Francois ;
Kurth, Karl H. ;
Schroeder, Fritz H. ;
Collette, Laurence .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, 25 (27) :4178-4186
[28]   Incidence, etiology, location, prevention and treatment of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer [J].
Wieder, JA ;
Soloway, MS .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1998, 160 (02) :299-315
[29]   Should Pathologists Routinely Report Prostate Tumour Volume? The Prognostic Value of Tumour Volume in Prostate Cancer [J].
Wolters, Tineke ;
Roobol, Monique J. ;
van Leeuwen, Pim J. ;
van den Bergh, Roderick C. N. ;
Hoedemaeker, Robert F. ;
van Leenders, Geert J. L. H. ;
Schroeder, Fritz H. ;
van der Kwast, Theodorus H. .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2010, 57 (05) :821-829
[30]   LONG-TERM (15 YEARS) RESULTS AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY FOR CLINICALLY LOCALIZED (STAGE-T2C OR LOWER) PROSTATE-CANCER [J].
ZINCKE, H ;
OESTERLING, JE ;
BLUTE, ML ;
BERGSTRALH, EJ ;
MYERS, RP ;
BARRETT, DM .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1994, 152 (05) :1850-1857