High percent tumor volume predicts biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy in pathological stage T3a prostate cancer with a negative surgical margin

被引:13
|
作者
You, Dalsan [1 ]
Jeong, In Gab [1 ]
Song, Cheryn [1 ]
Cho, Yong Mee [2 ]
Hong, Jun Hyuk [1 ]
Kim, Choung-Soo [1 ]
Ahn, Hanjong [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ulsan, Coll Med, Asan Med Ctr, Dept Urol, Seoul 138736, South Korea
[2] Univ Ulsan, Coll Med, Asan Med Ctr, Dept Pathol, Seoul 138736, South Korea
关键词
tumor volume; prostate cancer; surgical margins; prostatectomy; biochemical recurrence; POSTOPERATIVE RADIOTHERAPY; PROGNOSTIC-SIGNIFICANCE; DISEASE RECURRENCE; HIGH-RISK; MEN; PROGRESSION; LOCATION;
D O I
10.1111/iju.12348
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives To evaluate the impact of percent tumor volume and surgical margin status on biochemical recurrence in pT3-T4 prostate cancer. Methods A total of 397 patients who had pT3-T4N0 diseases and did not receive neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy were included for analysis. Results In the entire cohort, prostate-specific antigen (per 1 ng/mL increase; hazard ratio 1.019; P = 0.002), pathological stage (T3b-T4 vs T3a; hazard ratio 2.283; P < 0.001), Gleason score (>= 8 vs <= 6; hazard ratio 5.290; P = 0.005), surgical margin status (multiple positive vs negative; hazard ratio 1.839; P = 0.003) and lymphovascular invasion (present vs absent; hazard ratio 1.641; P = 0.008) were independent predictors of recurrence. Percent tumor volume was an independent predictor of recurrence in T3a diseases with negative surgical margins. In analysis using receiver operating characteristic curve, a threshold of 12% showed the best balance of sensitivity and specificity, 66% and 67%, respectively. The 5-year recurrence-free survival rates of pT3a diseases with negative surgical margin were 85.2% for percent tumor volume <= 12% and 57.7% for percent tumor volume >12% (P < 0.001). Patients with pT3a with negative surgical margins and percent tumor volume >12% showed comparable 5-year recurrence-free survival rate compared with those with pT3a with positive surgical margin (57.7% vs 57.6%; P = 0.763). Conclusions Despite having less impact on recurrence than other clinicopathological variables in pT3-T4 prostate cancer, percent tumor volume can further improve recurrence risk stratification in pT3a diseases with negative surgical margins.
引用
收藏
页码:484 / 489
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Impact of positive surgical margin on biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy in locally advanced prostate cancer
    Ceylan, Cavit
    Tonyali, Senol
    Keles, Ibrahim
    KAOHSIUNG JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2016, 32 (10) : 514 - 517
  • [2] Percent tumor volume predicts biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy: multi-institutional data analysis
    Song, Cheryn
    Seo, Seongil
    Ahn, Hanjong
    Byun, Seok-Soo
    Cho, Jin Seon
    Choi, Young Deuk
    Lee, Eunsik
    Lee, Hyun Moo
    Lee, Sang Eun
    Choi, Han Yong
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 17 (04) : 355 - 360
  • [3] Do tumor volume, percent tumor volume predict biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy? A meta-analysis
    Meng, Yang
    Li, He
    Xu, Peng
    Wang, Jia
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2015, 8 (12): : 22319 - 22327
  • [4] Biochemical Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy: Multiplicative Interaction Between Surgical Margin Status and Pathological Stage
    Budaeus, Lars
    Isbarn, Hendrik
    Eichelberg, Christian
    Lughezzani, Giovanni
    Sun, Maxine
    Perrotte, Paul
    Chun, Felix K. H.
    Salomon, Georg
    Steuber, Thomas
    Koellermann, Jens
    Sauter, Guido
    Ahyai, Sascha A.
    Zacharias, Mario
    Fisch, Margit
    Schlomm, Thorsten
    Haese, Alexander
    Heinzer, Hans
    Huland, Hartwig
    Montorsi, Francesco
    Graefen, Markus
    Karakiewicz, Pierre I.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 184 (04) : 1341 - 1346
  • [5] Prostate Cancer That Is Within 0.1 mm of the Surgical Margin of a Radical Prostatectomy Predicts Greater Likelihood of Recurrence
    Izard, Jason P.
    True, Lawrence D.
    May, Philip
    Ellis, William J.
    Lange, Paul H.
    Dalkin, Bruce
    Lin, Daniel W.
    Schmidt, Rodney A.
    Wright, Jonathan L.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 2014, 38 (03) : 333 - 338
  • [6] Factors affecting biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy in patients with positive and negative surgical margin
    Celik, Serdar
    Eker, Anil
    Bozkurt, Ibrahim Halil
    Bolat, Deniz
    Basmaci, Ismail
    Sefik, Ertugrul
    Degirmenci, Tansu
    Gunlusoy, Bulent
    PROSTATE INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 8 (04) : 178 - 184
  • [7] Percent tumor volume predicts biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy: multi-institutional data analysis
    Cheryn Song
    Seongil Seo
    Hanjong Ahn
    Seok-Soo Byun
    Jin Seon Cho
    Young Deuk Choi
    Eunsik Lee
    Hyun Moo Lee
    Sang Eun Lee
    Han Yong Choi
    International Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2012, 17 : 355 - 360
  • [8] Tumor volume improves the long-term prediction of biochemical recurrence-free survival after radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer with positive surgical margins
    Meyer, Christian P.
    Hansen, Jens
    Boehm, Katharina
    Tilki, Derya
    Abdollah, Firas
    Quoc-Dien Trinh
    Fisch, Margit
    Sauter, Guido
    Graefen, Markus
    Huland, Hartwig
    Chun, Felix K. H.
    Ahyai, Sascha A.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 35 (02) : 199 - 206
  • [9] Tumor volume, surgical margin, and the risk of biochemical recurrence in men with organ-confined prostate cancer
    Song, Cheryn
    Kang, Taejin
    Yoo, Sangjun
    Jeong, In Gab
    Ro, Jae Y.
    Hong, Jun Hyuk
    Kim, Choung-Soo
    Ahn, Hanjong
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2013, 31 (02) : 168 - 174
  • [10] Smaller Prostate Volume is Associated with Adverse Pathological Features and Biochemical Recurrence after Radical Prostatectomy
    Buie, John
    De Riese, Werner
    Sharma, Pranav
    UROLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2019, 30 (06) : 255 - 261