Architectural Distortion on Mammography: Correlation With Pathologic Outcomes and Predictors of Malignancy

被引:82
作者
Bahl, Manisha [1 ]
Baker, Jay A. [1 ]
Kinsey, Emily N. [2 ]
Ghate, Sujata V. [1 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Div Breast Imaging, Dept Radiol, Med Ctr, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Med, Durham, NC 27710 USA
关键词
architectural distortion; breast; mammography; RADIAL SCARS; LOBULAR CARCINOMA; SURGICAL EXCISION; BREAST-LESIONS; SONOGRAPHY; AGREEMENT; FEATURES; CANCERS; BIOPSY;
D O I
10.2214/AJR.15.14628
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE. The objective of our study was to determine the risk of malignancy associated with architectural distortion and to evaluate the imaging and clinical features that may contribute to the prediction of malignancy in the setting of architectural distortion. MATERIALS AND METHODS. We performed a retrospective review of architectural distortion cases from January 1, 2004, to December 31, 2013. Imaging findings and pathology outcomes were reviewed. RESULTS. Over the 10-year study period, architectural distortion that was considered to be suspicious for or highly suggestive of malignancy was present in 435 of 231,051 (0.2%) mammographic examinations. Cases were excluded if the main finding described was a mass with an associated feature of architectural distortion (n = 62) or if no pathology results were available (n = 4). Two hundred seventy-five cases of invasive adenocarcinoma or ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) were identified; the positive predictive value (PPV) was therefore 74.5% (275/369). DCIS alone was identified in only 4.1% (15/369). The most common benign finding on pathology was a radial scar or complex sclerosing lesion (27/369, 7.3%). Architectural distortion was less likely to represent malignancy on screening mammography than on diagnostic mammography (67.0% vs 83.1%, respectively; p < 0.001). Architectural distortion without a sonographic correlate was less likely to represent malignancy than architectural distortion with a correlate (27.9% vs 82.9%, respectively; p < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in the malignancy rate between pure architectural distortion and architectural distortion with calcifications or asymmetries (73.0% vs 78.8%; p = 0.26). CONCLUSION. The PPV of architectural distortion for malignancy is 74.5%. Architectural distortion is less likely to represent malignancy if detected on screening mammography than on diagnostic mammography or if there is no sonographic correlate.
引用
收藏
页码:1339 / 1345
页数:7
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], SEER Stat Fact Sheets: "Ovary Cancer."
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2013, ACR BIRADS ATLAS BRE
  • [3] Infiltrating lobular carcinoma of the breast: tumor characteristics and clinical outcome
    Arpino, G
    Bardou, VJ
    Clark, GM
    Elledge, RM
    [J]. BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2004, 6 (03): : R149 - R156
  • [4] Breast imaging reporting and data system standardized mammography lexicon: Observer variability in lesion description
    Baker, JA
    Kornguth, PJ
    Floyd, CE
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1996, 166 (04) : 773 - 778
  • [5] Computer-aided detection (CAD) in screening mammography: Sensitivity of commercial CAD systems for detecting architectural distortion
    Baker, JA
    Rosen, EL
    Lo, JY
    Gimenez, EI
    Welsh, R
    Soo, MS
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2003, 181 (04) : 1083 - 1088
  • [6] Can sonography be used to help differentiate between radial scars and breast cancers?
    Cawson, JN
    [J]. BREAST, 2005, 14 (05) : 352 - 359
  • [7] RADIAL SCARS OF THE BREAST - REVIEW OF 38 CONSECUTIVE MAMMOGRAPHIC DIAGNOSES
    CIATTO, S
    MORRONE, D
    CATARZI, S
    DELTURCO, MR
    BIANCHI, S
    AMBROGETTI, D
    CARIDDI, A
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1993, 187 (03) : 757 - 760
  • [8] Medical audit of diagnostic mammography examinations: Comparison with screening outcomes obtained concurrently
    Dee, KE
    Sickles, EA
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2001, 176 (03) : 729 - 733
  • [9] Variability in Interpretive Performance at Screening Mammography and Radiologists' Characteristics Associated with Accuracy
    Elmore, Joann G.
    Jackson, Sara L.
    Abraham, Linn
    Miglioretti, Diana L.
    Carney, Patricia A.
    Geller, Berta M.
    Yankaskas, Bonnie C.
    Kerlikowske, Karla
    Onega, Tracy
    Rosenberg, Robert D.
    Sickles, Edward A.
    Buist, Diana S. M.
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2009, 253 (03) : 641 - 651
  • [10] Preoperative Tomosynthesis-guided Needle Localization of Mammographically and Sonographically Occult Breast Lesions
    Freer, Phoebe E.
    Niell, Bethany
    Rafferty, Elizabeth A.
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2015, 275 (02) : 377 - 383