Developing best practice guidelines for lake modelling to inform quantitative microbial risk assessment

被引:1
|
作者
Yu, Songyan [1 ,2 ]
Sturm, Katrin [3 ]
Gibbes, Badin [4 ]
Kennard, Mark J. [1 ,2 ]
Veal, Cameron J. [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Middleton, Duncan [3 ]
Fisher, Paul L. [3 ,4 ]
Rotherham, Simon [3 ]
Hamilton, David P. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Griffith Univ, Australian Rivers Inst, Nathan, Qld, Australia
[2] Griffith Univ, Sch Environm & Sci, Nathan, Qld, Australia
[3] Seqwater, Ipswich, Qld, Australia
[4] Univ Queensland, Sch Civil Engn, St Lucia, Qld, Australia
[5] Griffith Univ, Cities Res Inst, Nathan, Qld, Australia
关键词
Lake hydrodynamic model; Guidance; Pathogen; Water quality; Health-based targets; DRINKING-WATER; PATHOGEN CONCENTRATIONS; MANAGEMENT; FRAMEWORK; STEPS; RIVER;
D O I
10.1016/j.envsoft.2022.105334
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Numerical models of lakes and reservoirs have been widely applied to provide quantitative forecasts of pathogen occurrence and persistence in source water to inform quantitative microbial risk assessment (QMRA). There is an emerging need in the water supply industry for a set of best practice modelling guidelines, supporting consistent and repeatable use of lake modelling approaches that could be used to provide quality assurance to water authorities and regulators. To aid in the development of these guidelines, we conducted a literature review to summarise common modelling steps from existing water modelling guidelines as the basis for best practice guidelines for lake modelling. We also report on the results of a workshop, expert interviews, and online surveys that identify common challenges and requirements for each step. The summarised lake modelling steps and key requirements pave the way to complete the development of best practice guidelines for lake modelling to inform QMRA.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Developing best practice guidelines on equine colic
    Freeman, Sarah
    Curtis, Laila
    VETERINARY RECORD, 2015, 176 (02) : 38 - U28
  • [2] A novel quantitative ecological and microbial risk assessment methodology: theory and practice
    Duarte, Heitor Oliveira
    Lopez Droguett, Enrique
    Moura, Marcio das Chagas
    Santos Campos Siqueira, Paulo Gabriel
    de Lira Junior, Jose Claudino
    HUMAN AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT, 2020, 26 (06): : 1622 - 1645
  • [3] Quantitative microbial risk assessment
    Berg, G
    RISK ANALYSIS, 2001, 21 (05) : 979 - 980
  • [4] BEST PRACTICE AND COMMON PRACTICE IN RISK ASSESSMENT
    Mauro, Elena
    2019 PETROLEUM AND CHEMICAL INDUSTRY CONFERENCE EUROPE (PCIC EUROPE), 2019, : 56 - 66
  • [5] Quantitative microbial risk assessment modelling for the use of reclaimed water in irrigated horticulture
    Hamilton, AJ
    Stagnitti, F
    Boland, AM
    Premier, R
    ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH RISK III, 2005, 9 : 71 - 81
  • [6] Modelling urban sewer flooding and quantitative microbial risk assessment: A critical review
    Addison-Atkinson, William
    Chen, Albert S.
    Memon, Fayyaz A.
    Chang, Tsang-Jung
    JOURNAL OF FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT, 2022, 15 (04):
  • [7] Improving adherence to best-practice guidelines for venous thromboembolism risk assessment and prevention
    Schiro, Timothy A.
    Sakowski, Julie
    Romanelli, Robert J.
    Jukes, Trevor
    Newman, Jeffrey
    Hudnut, Andrew
    Leonard, Thomas
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH-SYSTEM PHARMACY, 2011, 68 (22) : 2184 - 2189
  • [8] Guidelines for Developing Quantitative Safety Risk Criteria
    Phifer, Russell
    JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL HEALTH & SAFETY, 2010, 17 (03): : 44 - 44
  • [9] Quantitative microbial risk assessment and Australian Guidelines for Water Recycling: two case studies
    O'Toole, J.
    Sinclair, M.
    Leder, K.
    FOOD AUSTRALIA, 2010, 62 (09): : 408 - 412
  • [10] Improved quantitative microbial risk assessment (QMRA) for drinking water sources in developing countries
    Amatobi, D. A.
    Agunwamba, J. C.
    APPLIED WATER SCIENCE, 2022, 12 (03)