Investigating Open Government Data Barriers A Literature Review and Conceptualization

被引:18
作者
Crusoe, Jonathan [1 ]
Melin, Ulf [1 ]
机构
[1] Linkoping Univ, Div Informat Syst, S-58183 Linkoping, Sweden
来源
ELECTRONIC GOVERNMENT (EGOV 2018) | 2018年 / 11020卷
关键词
Open data; Open government data; OGD; Barriers; Risks; Challenges; Impediments; Myths; Process; Literature review; CHALLENGES; BENEFITS; MYTHS;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-319-98690-6_15
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
When focusing on open government data (OGD) publishing and related barriers, there are several complexities present. Largely, current research is focused on publishing and usage of OGD; and we argue that there are a need to investigate and to systematise OGD barrier research in order to understand and outline an expanded scope of the phenomenon. We expand by clarifying barriers linked to the release decision and the data's organisational context. To investigate the OGD barriers, we conduct a systematic literature review, identifying 34 articles as a point of departure for our analysis. From these articles we create, present and discuss illustrations on historical development, barrier types, and different research focuses on OGD. When analysing the articles, we identify a focus on technical, organisational, and legal barrier types, while studies on open data usage and systems are less frequent. Our analysis also identifies some possible open data research barriers. In the article we also relate barriers to an expanded OGD process (Suitability, Release, Publish, Use, and Evaluation), identifying 46 barriers with possible linkages. The results is an expanded scope and a conceptual illustration of OGD barriers.
引用
收藏
页码:169 / 183
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Enhancing the usability and usefulness of open government data: A comprehensive review of the state of open government data visualization research [J].
Ansari, Bahareh ;
Barati, Mehdi ;
Martin, Erika G. .
GOVERNMENT INFORMATION QUARTERLY, 2022, 39 (01)
[32]   A systematic review of barriers impeding the implementation of government green procurement [J].
Vejaratnam, Navarani ;
Mohamad, Zeeda Fatimah ;
Chenayah, Santha .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC PROCUREMENT, 2020, 20 (04) :451-471
[33]   Do SMEs Consider Open Data as a Vital Intellectual Asset? a Systematic Literature Review [J].
Moghadasi, Arash .
JOURNAL OF THE KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY, 2023, 15 (3) :11784-11818
[34]   Towards a taxonomy of research areas in open government data [J].
Mohamad, Ahmad Nadzri ;
Sylvester, Allan ;
Campbell-Meier, Jennifer .
ONLINE INFORMATION REVIEW, 2024, 48 (01) :67-83
[35]   Open Government Data and File Formats: Constraints on Collaboration [J].
Washington, Anne L. ;
Morar, David .
DG.O 2017: THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE 18TH ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DIGITAL GOVERNMENT RESEARCH: INNOVATIONS AND TRANSFORMATIONS IN GOVERNMENT, 2017, :155-159
[36]   Summarizing the decadal literature in open government data (OGD) research: a systematic review [J].
Saxena, Stuti .
FORESIGHT, 2018, 20 (06) :648-664
[37]   Open government data representation and retrieval: a literatura review [J].
de Oliveira, Danielle Teixeira ;
Silvan, Patricia Nascimento .
RDBCI-REVISTA DIGITAL DE BIBLIOTECONOMIA E CIENCIA DA INFORMACAO, 2024, 22
[38]   Y Categorisation of Open Government Data Literature [J].
Ferencek, Aljaz ;
Borstnar, Mirjana Kljajic ;
Zagar, Ajda Pretnar .
BUSINESS SYSTEMS RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2022, 13 (01) :66-83
[39]   Understanding transparency of government from a Nordic perspective: open government and open data movement as a multidimensional collaborative phenomenon in Sweden [J].
Kassen, Maxat .
JOURNAL OF GLOBAL INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 2017, 20 (04) :236-275
[40]   Barriers to the Open Government Data Agenda: Taking a Multi-Level Perspective [J].
Martin, Chris .
POLICY AND INTERNET, 2014, 6 (03) :217-240