Simulation code for estimating external gamma-ray doses from a radioactive plume and contaminated ground using a local-scale atmospheric dispersion model

被引:2
作者
Satoh, Daiki [1 ]
Nakayama, Hiromasa [1 ]
Furuta, Takuya [1 ]
Yoshihiro, Tamotsu [2 ]
Sakamoto, Kensaku [3 ]
机构
[1] Japan Atom Energy Agcy, Nucl Sci & Engn Ctr, Ibaraki, Japan
[2] Hewlett Packard Japan Ltd, Tech Serv, East Tech Consultant, Koto Ku, Tokyo, Japan
[3] Japan Atom Energy Agcy, Ctr Computat Sci & E Syst, Ibaraki, Japan
来源
PLOS ONE | 2021年 / 16卷 / 01期
基金
日本学术振兴会;
关键词
LARGE-EDDY SIMULATION; TURBULENT-FLOW; TRANSPORT; SYSTEM; EXPOSURE; PARTICLE; VERSION; SCHEME; CESIUM;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0245932
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
In this study, we developed a simulation code powered by lattice dose-response functions (hereinafter SIBYL), which helps in the quick and accurate estimation of external gamma-ray doses emitted from a radioactive plume and contaminated ground. SIBYL couples with atmospheric dispersion models and calculates gamma-ray dose distributions inside a target area based on a map of activity concentrations using pre-evaluated dose-response functions. Moreover, SIBYL considers radiation shielding due to obstructions such as buildings. To examine the reliability of SIBYL, we investigated five typical cases for steady-state and unsteady-state plume dispersions by coupling the Gaussian plume model and the local-scale high-resolution atmospheric dispersion model using large eddy simulation. The results of this coupled model were compared with those of full Monte Carlo simulations using the particle and heavy-ion transport code system (PHITS). The dose-distribution maps calculated using SIBYL differed by up to 10% from those calculated using PHITS in most target locations. The exceptions were locations far from the radioactive contamination and those behind the intricate structures of building arrays. In addition, SIBYL's computation time using 96 parallel processing elements was several tens of minutes even for the most computationally expensive tasks of this study. The computation using SIBYL was approximately 100 times faster than the same calculation using PHITS under the same computation conditions. From the results of the case studies, we concluded that SIBYL can estimate a ground-level dose-distribution map within one hour with accuracy that is comparable to that of the full Monte Carlo simulation.
引用
收藏
页数:26
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
Ahrens J., 2005, VISUALIZATION HDB, P717, DOI DOI 10.1016/B978-012387582-2/50038-1
[2]  
Allwine J, 2004, OVERVIEW JOINT URBAN
[3]   A gamma radiation dose calculation method for use with Lagrangian puff atmospheric dispersion models used in real-time emergency response systems [J].
Andronopoulos, S. ;
Bartzis, J. G. .
JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION, 2010, 30 (04) :747-759
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1961, Nuc. Safety
[5]  
Armand P., 2015, COST ES1006 BEST PRA
[6]   CONCENTRATION FLUCTUATIONS AND FLUXES IN PLUMES FROM POINT SOURCES IN A TURBULENT BOUNDARY-LAYER [J].
FACKRELL, JE ;
ROBINS, AG .
JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS, 1982, 117 (APR) :1-26
[7]  
Gifford F., 1960, Nuclear Safety, V2, P56
[8]  
Hirayama H., 2005, The EGS5 Code System. SLAC-R-730 and KEK Report 2005-8 .
[9]  
ICRP, 1996, INT COMMISSION RADIO, V26
[10]   Benchmark study of the recent version of the PHITS code [J].
Iwamoto, Yosuke ;
Sato, Tatsuhiko ;
Hashimoto, Shintaro ;
Ogawa, Tatsuhiko ;
Furuta, Takuya ;
Abe, Shin-Ichiro ;
Kai, Takeshi ;
Matsuda, Norihiro ;
Hosoyamada, Ryuji ;
Niita, Koji .
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 54 (05) :617-635