Bond strength of eco-friendly class C fly ash-based thermally cured alkali-activated concrete to portland cement concrete

被引:44
作者
Gomaa, Eslam [1 ]
Gheni, Ahmed A. [1 ]
Kashosi, Cedric [1 ]
ElGawady, Mohamed A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Missouri Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Civil Architectural & Environm Engn, 1401 N Pine St,324 Butler Canton Hall, Rolla, MO 65409 USA
关键词
Class C fly ash; Alkali activated concrete; Repair; Bond strength; Oven curing; Adhesion; SUBSTRATE; REPAIR; GEOPOLYMERS; INTERFACE; ROUGHNESS; MORTAR;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.268
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Sixty percent of existing USA bridges were constructed using conventional concrete (CC), i.e., ordinary Portland cement (OPC)-based concrete. Due to aging and changes in standards, many of these bridges require structural repair. To develop engineering-sound repairs, the bond strength between the repair material and existing structure needs to be investigated. This study investigated the bond strength between CC and alkali-activated concrete (AAC) as a repair material using slant shear and pull-off tests. The AACs were synthesized using five different class C fly ashes with different chemical compositions and physical properties. The AAC was cured at an elevated temperature of 158 degrees F for 24 h. The bond interface surface is subjected to different types of stresses during the service life of the repaired structure. Therefore, slant shear and pull-off tests were performed to assess the bond strength between CC and AAC bond surfaces subjected to compression-shear and direct tension, respectively. For the slant shear, three inclination interface angles of 45 degrees, 33.75, and 22.5 degrees were investigated. For the pull-off test, a bonding agent and sandblasting were investigated. The slant shear results displayed that the adhesion coefficient and the internal friction angle of the AAC repair ranged from 4.96 to 6.94 psi and 24 degrees to 35 degrees, respectively. Furthermore, while the sandblasting surface treatment improved the bond strength, the bonding agent did not. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:404 / 416
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
[11]  
[Anonymous], ADV CEM RES
[12]  
[Anonymous], J MAT CIV ENG
[13]  
[Anonymous], 2017, C39 ASTM
[14]  
[Anonymous], INT C POL CONCR ICPI
[15]  
[Anonymous], ARTBAS 6 ANN BRIDG R
[16]  
[Anonymous], STAND SPEC AIR ENTR
[17]   Shear bond testing of concrete repairs [J].
Austin, S ;
Robins, P ;
Pan, YG .
CEMENT AND CONCRETE RESEARCH, 1999, 29 (07) :1067-1076
[18]   CARBON AND STEEL MICROFIBER-REINFORCED CEMENT-BASED COMPOSITES FOR THIN REPAIRS [J].
BANTHIA, N ;
DUBEAU, S .
JOURNAL OF MATERIALS IN CIVIL ENGINEERING, 1994, 6 (01) :88-99
[19]  
Davidovits J., GEOPOLYMER CHEM APPL
[20]  
Davidovits J., 2008, Proceedings of the 12th Annual Conference on Composites and Advanced Ceramic Materials: Ceramic Engineering and Science Proceedings, P835