Health state utilities for metastatic breast cancer

被引:275
作者
Lloyd, A.
Nafees, B.
Narewska, J.
Dewilde, S.
Watkins, J.
机构
[1] United BioSource Corp, London WC1A 2NS, England
[2] Eli Lilly & Co, Basingstoke RG24 9NL, Hants, England
关键词
breast cancer; utility; quality of life; standard gamble;
D O I
10.1038/sj.bjc.6603326
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The aim of the study was to obtain United Kingdom-based societal preferences for distinct stages of metastatic breast cancer (MBC) and six common toxicities. Health states were developed based on literature review, iterative cycles of interviews and a focus group with clinical experts. They described the burden of progressive, responding and stable disease on treatment; and also febrile neutropenia, stomatitis; diarrhoea/vomiting; fatigue; hand-foot syndrome (grade 3/4 toxicities) and hair loss. One hundred members of the general public rated them using standard gamble to determine health state utility. Data were analysed with a mixed model analysis. The study sample was a good match to the general public of England and Wales by demographics and current quality of life. Stable disease on treatment had a utility value of 0.72, with a corresponding gain of +0.07 following a treatment response and a decline by 0.27 for disease progression. Toxicities lead to declines in utility between 0.10 (diarrhoea/vomiting) and 0.15 (febrile neutropenia). This study underlines the value that society place on the avoidance of disease progression and severe side effects in MBC. This may be the largest preference study in breast cancer designed to survey a representative general public sample.
引用
收藏
页码:683 / 690
页数:8
相关论文
共 23 条
[21]   EQ-5D: a measure of health status from the EuroQol Group [J].
Rabin, R ;
de Charro, F .
ANNALS OF MEDICINE, 2001, 33 (05) :337-343
[22]   The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer breast cancer-specific quality-of-life questionnaire module: First results from a three-country field study [J].
Sprangers, MAG ;
Groenvold, M ;
Arraras, JI ;
Franklin, J ;
teVelde, A ;
Muller, M ;
Franzini, L ;
Wiliams, A ;
deHaes, HCJM ;
Hopwood, P ;
Cull, A ;
Aaronson, NK .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1996, 14 (10) :2756-2768
[23]   MEASUREMENT OF HEALTH STATE UTILITIES FOR ECONOMIC APPRAISAL - A REVIEW [J].
TORRANCE, GW .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 1986, 5 (01) :1-30