Health state utilities for metastatic breast cancer

被引:275
作者
Lloyd, A.
Nafees, B.
Narewska, J.
Dewilde, S.
Watkins, J.
机构
[1] United BioSource Corp, London WC1A 2NS, England
[2] Eli Lilly & Co, Basingstoke RG24 9NL, Hants, England
关键词
breast cancer; utility; quality of life; standard gamble;
D O I
10.1038/sj.bjc.6603326
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The aim of the study was to obtain United Kingdom-based societal preferences for distinct stages of metastatic breast cancer (MBC) and six common toxicities. Health states were developed based on literature review, iterative cycles of interviews and a focus group with clinical experts. They described the burden of progressive, responding and stable disease on treatment; and also febrile neutropenia, stomatitis; diarrhoea/vomiting; fatigue; hand-foot syndrome (grade 3/4 toxicities) and hair loss. One hundred members of the general public rated them using standard gamble to determine health state utility. Data were analysed with a mixed model analysis. The study sample was a good match to the general public of England and Wales by demographics and current quality of life. Stable disease on treatment had a utility value of 0.72, with a corresponding gain of +0.07 following a treatment response and a decline by 0.27 for disease progression. Toxicities lead to declines in utility between 0.10 (diarrhoea/vomiting) and 0.15 (febrile neutropenia). This study underlines the value that society place on the avoidance of disease progression and severe side effects in MBC. This may be the largest preference study in breast cancer designed to survey a representative general public sample.
引用
收藏
页码:683 / 690
页数:8
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2004, GUID METH TECHN APPR
[2]  
Bennett KJ, 1996, QUALITY LIFE PHARMAC, P253
[3]   Reliability and validity of the functional assessment of cancer therapy-breast quality-of-life instrument [J].
Brady, MJ ;
Cella, DF ;
Mo, F ;
Bonomi, AE ;
Tulsky, DS ;
Lloyd, SR ;
Deasy, S ;
Cobleigh, M ;
Shiomoto, G .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1997, 15 (03) :974-986
[4]   Goals and objectives in the management of metastatic breast cancer [J].
Chung, CT ;
Carlson, RW .
ONCOLOGIST, 2003, 8 (06) :514-520
[5]   Systematic overview of cost-utility assessments in oncology [J].
Earle, CC ;
Chapman, RH ;
Baker, CS ;
Bell, CM ;
Stone, PW ;
Sandberg, EA ;
Neumann, PJ .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2000, 18 (18) :3302-3317
[6]   Quality-adjusted life years was a poor predictor of women's willingness to pay in acute and chronic conditions: results of a survey [J].
Franic, DM ;
Pathak, DS ;
Gafni, A .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2005, 58 (03) :291-303
[7]   Effect of including (versus excluding) fates worse than death on utility measurement [J].
Franic, DM ;
Pathak, DS .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2003, 19 (02) :347-361
[8]   Palliative effect of chemotherapy: Objective tumor response is associated with symptom improvement in patients with metastatic breast cancer [J].
Geels, P ;
Eisenhauer, E ;
Bezjak, A ;
Zee, B ;
Day, A .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2000, 18 (12) :2395-2405
[9]  
Gold MR, 1996, COST EFFECTIVENESS H
[10]   EFFICACY AND COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF AUTOLOGOUS BONE-MARROW TRANSPLANTATION IN METASTATIC BREAST-CANCER - ESTIMATES USING DECISION-ANALYSIS WHILE AWAITING CLINICAL-TRIAL RESULTS [J].
HILLNER, BE ;
SMITH, TJ ;
DESCH, CE .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1992, 267 (15) :2055-2061