Measuring Organizational Performance: Towards Methodological Best Practice

被引:882
作者
Richard, Pierre J. [1 ]
Devinney, Timothy M. [1 ]
Yip, George S. [2 ]
Johnson, Gerry [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ New S Wales, Australian Sch Business, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Erasmus Univ, Rotterdam Sch Management, NL-3000 DR Rotterdam, Netherlands
[3] Univ Lancaster, Sch Management, Lancaster, England
关键词
performance; profitability; empirical measurement; construct validity; organizational effectiveness; BUSINESS ECONOMIC-PERFORMANCE; FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE; CONSTRUCT MEASUREMENT; MANAGEMENT RESEARCH; STRATEGY RESEARCH; FIRM PERFORMANCE; MARKET; PROFITABILITY; PERCEPTIONS; PERSISTENCE;
D O I
10.1177/0149206308330560
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Organizational performance is one of the most important constructs in management research. Reviewing past studies reveals a multidimensional conceptualization of organizational performance related predominately to stakeholders, heterogeneous product market circumstances, and time. A review of the operationalization of performance highlights the limited effectiveness of commonly accepted measurement practices in tapping this multidimensionality. Addressing these findings requires researchers to (a) possess a strong theoretical rationale on the nature of performance (i.e., theory establishing which measures are appropriate to the research context) and (b) rely on strong theory as to the nature of measures (i.e., theory establishing which measures should be combined and the method for doing so). All management research on performance should explicitly address these two requirements. The authors conclude with a call for research that examines triangulation using multiple measures, longitudinal data and alternative methodological formulations as methods of appropriately aligning research contexts with the measurement of organizational performance.
引用
收藏
页码:718 / 804
页数:87
相关论文
共 141 条
[1]  
AILAWADI KL, 2004, 04001 MARK SCI I
[2]   FINANCIAL RATIOS, DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS AND PREDICTION OF CORPORATE BANKRUPTCY [J].
ALTMAN, EI .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 1968, 23 (04) :589-609
[3]  
Arnold A., 1999, Fundamenta Informaticae, V40, P109
[4]   AN EMPIRICAL CRITIQUE OF IN SEARCH OF EXCELLENCE - HOW EXCELLENT ARE THE EXCELLENT COMPANIES [J].
AUPPERLE, KE ;
BOOTH, DE .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 1986, 12 (04) :499-512
[5]   Survivorship and the economic grim reaper [J].
Baker, GP ;
Kennedy, RE .
JOURNAL OF LAW ECONOMICS & ORGANIZATION, 2002, 18 (02) :324-361
[6]   FIRM RESOURCES AND SUSTAINED COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE [J].
BARNEY, J .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 1991, 17 (01) :99-120
[7]   Strategic decision speed and firm performance [J].
Baum, JR ;
Wally, S .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2003, 24 (11) :1107-1129
[9]   Does EVA® beat earnings?: Evidence on associations with stock returns and firm values [J].
Biddle, GC ;
Bowen, RM ;
Wallace, JS .
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING & ECONOMICS, 1997, 24 (03) :301-336
[10]  
Blattberg Charles., 2000, PLURALIST PATRIOTIC