Deciphering the mechanism behind Fibroblast Growth Factor (FGF) induced biphasic signal-response profiles

被引:28
作者
Kanodia, Jitendra [1 ]
Chai, Diana [1 ]
Vollmer, Jannik [1 ]
Kim, Jaeyeon [1 ]
Raue, Andreas [1 ]
Finn, Greg [1 ]
Schoeberl, Birgit [1 ]
机构
[1] Merrimack Pharmaceut, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
关键词
FGF signaling pathway; HSGAGs; Biphasic response; High throughput quantification; ODE-modeling; Particle swarm optimization; HEPARAN-SULFATE; CELL-SURFACE; CRYSTAL-STRUCTURE; FACTOR BINDING; HIGH-AFFINITY; RECEPTOR; MODEL; LIGAND; EGF; PROTEOGLYCANS;
D O I
10.1186/1478-811X-12-34
中图分类号
Q2 [细胞生物学];
学科分类号
071009 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Background: The Fibroblast Growth Factor (FGF) pathway is driving various aspects of cellular responses in both normal and malignant cells. One interesting characteristic of this pathway is the biphasic nature of the cellular response to some FGF ligands like FGF2. Specifically, it has been shown that phenotypic behaviors controlled by FGF signaling, like migration and growth, reach maximal levels in response to intermediate concentrations, while high levels of FGF2 elicit weak responses. The mechanisms leading to the observed biphasic response remains unexplained. Results: A combination of experiments and computational modeling was used to understand the mechanism behind the observed biphasic signaling responses. FGF signaling involves a tertiary surface interaction that we captured with a computational model based on Ordinary Differential Equations (ODEs). It accounts for FGF2 binding to FGF receptors (FGFRs) and heparan sulfate glycosaminoglycans (HSGAGs), followed by receptor-phosphorylation, activation of the FRS2 adapter protein and the Ras-Raf signaling cascade. Quantitative protein assays were used to measure the dynamics of phosphorylated ERK (pERK) in response to a wide range of FGF2 ligand concentrations on a fine-grained time scale for the squamous cell lung cancer cell line H1703. We developed a novel approach combining Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) and feature-based constraints in the objective function to calibrate the computational model to the experimental data. The model is validated using a series of extracellular and intracellular perturbation experiments. We demonstrate that in silico model predictions are in accordance with the observed in vitro results. Conclusions: Using a combined approach of computational modeling and experiments we found that competition between binding of the ligand FGF2 to HSGAG and FGF receptor leads to the biphasic response. At low to intermediate concentrations of FGF2 there are sufficient free FGF receptors available for the FGF2-HSGAG complex to enable the formation of the trimeric signaling unit. At high ligand concentrations the ligand binding sites of the receptor become saturated and the trimeric signaling unit cannot be formed. This insight into the pathway is an important consideration for the pharmacological inhibition of this pathway.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   COMPARATIVE EXPRESSION OF FIBROBLAST GROWTH-FACTOR MESSENGER-RNAS IN BENIGN AND MALIGNANT BREAST DISEASE [J].
ANANDAPPA, SY ;
WINSTANLEY, JHR ;
LEINSTER, S ;
GREEN, B ;
RUDLAND, PS ;
BARRACLOUGH, R .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1994, 69 (04) :772-776
[2]   HEPARIN-DEPENDENT BINDING AND AUTOPHOSPHORYLATION OF EPIDERMAL GROWTH-FACTOR (EGF) RECEPTOR BY HEPARIN-BINDING EGF-LIKE GROWTH-FACTOR BUT NOT BY EGF [J].
AVIEZER, D ;
YAYON, A .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1994, 91 (25) :12173-12177
[3]   The Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia enables predictive modelling of anticancer drug sensitivity [J].
Barretina, Jordi ;
Caponigro, Giordano ;
Stransky, Nicolas ;
Venkatesan, Kavitha ;
Margolin, Adam A. ;
Kim, Sungjoon ;
Wilson, Christopher J. ;
Lehar, Joseph ;
Kryukov, Gregory V. ;
Sonkin, Dmitriy ;
Reddy, Anupama ;
Liu, Manway ;
Murray, Lauren ;
Berger, Michael F. ;
Monahan, John E. ;
Morais, Paula ;
Meltzer, Jodi ;
Korejwa, Adam ;
Jane-Valbuena, Judit ;
Mapa, Felipa A. ;
Thibault, Joseph ;
Bric-Furlong, Eva ;
Raman, Pichai ;
Shipway, Aaron ;
Engels, Ingo H. ;
Cheng, Jill ;
Yu, Guoying K. ;
Yu, Jianjun ;
Aspesi, Peter, Jr. ;
de Silva, Melanie ;
Jagtap, Kalpana ;
Jones, Michael D. ;
Wang, Li ;
Hatton, Charles ;
Palescandolo, Emanuele ;
Gupta, Supriya ;
Mahan, Scott ;
Sougnez, Carrie ;
Onofrio, Robert C. ;
Liefeld, Ted ;
MacConaill, Laura ;
Winckler, Wendy ;
Reich, Michael ;
Li, Nanxin ;
Mesirov, Jill P. ;
Gabriel, Stacey B. ;
Getz, Gad ;
Ardlie, Kristin ;
Chan, Vivien ;
Myer, Vic E. .
NATURE, 2012, 483 (7391) :603-607
[4]   The FGF family: biology, pathophysiology and therapy [J].
Beenken, Andrew ;
Mohammadi, Moosa .
NATURE REVIEWS DRUG DISCOVERY, 2009, 8 (03) :235-253
[5]   Cooperative Heparin-Mediated Oligomerization of Fibroblast Growth Factor-1 (FGF1) Precedes Recruitment of FGFR2 to Ternary Complexes [J].
Brown, Alan ;
Robinson, Christopher J. ;
Gallagher, John T. ;
Blundell, Tom L. .
BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2013, 104 (08) :1720-1730
[6]   THE HEPARIN-BINDING (FIBROBLAST) GROWTH-FACTOR FAMILY OF PROTEINS [J].
BURGESS, WH ;
MACIAG, T .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF BIOCHEMISTRY, 1989, 58 :575-606
[7]   Fibroblast growth factor-2 stimulation of p42/44MAPK phosphorylation and IκB degradation is regulated by heparan sulfate/heparin in rat mammary fibroblasts [J].
Delehedde, M ;
Seve, M ;
Sergeant, N ;
Wartelle, I ;
Lyon, M ;
Rudland, PS ;
Fernig, DG .
JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY, 2000, 275 (43) :33905-33910
[8]   Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor Inhibitors as a Cancer Treatment: From a Biologic Rationale to Medical Perspectives [J].
Dieci, Maria Vittoria ;
Arnedos, Monica ;
Andre, Fabrice ;
Soria, Jean Charles .
CANCER DISCOVERY, 2013, 3 (03) :264-279
[9]   Fibroblast growth factor 2 induced proliferation in osteoblasts and bone marrow stromal cells: A whole cell model [J].
Dupree, Melissa A. ;
Pollack, Solomon R. ;
Levine, Elliot M. ;
Laurencinz, Cato T. .
BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2006, 91 (08) :3097-3112
[10]   Potentiation and inhibition of bFGF binding by heparin: A model for regulation of cellular response [J].
Fannon, M ;
Forsten, KE ;
Nugent, MA .
BIOCHEMISTRY, 2000, 39 (06) :1434-1445