Machine Learning-Based Short-Term Mortality Prediction Models for Patients With Cancer Using Electronic Health Record Data: Systematic Review and Critical Appraisal

被引:24
作者
Lu, Sheng-Chieh [1 ]
Xu, Cai [1 ]
Nguyen, Chandler H. [2 ]
Geng, Yimin [3 ]
Pfob, Andre [4 ]
Sidey-Gibbons, Chris [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Symptom Res, 6565 MD Anderson Blvd, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Univ Texas Hlth Sci Ctr Houston, McGovern Med Sch, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[3] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Res Med Lib, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[4] Heidelberg Univ Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Heidelberg, Germany
关键词
machine learning; cancer mortality; artificial intelligence; clinical prediction models; end-of-life care; BIG DATA; RISK; END; PROGNOSIS; SURVIVAL; BIAS; CARE;
D O I
10.2196/33182
中图分类号
R-058 [];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: In the United States, national guidelines suggest that aggressive cancer care should be avoided in the final months of life. However, guideline compliance currently requires clinicians to make judgments based on their experience as to when a patient is nearing the end of their life. Machine learning (ML) algorithms may facilitate improved end-of-life care provision for patients with cancer by identifying patients at risk of short-term mortality. Objective: This study aims to summarize the evidence for applying ML in <= 1-year cancer mortality prediction to assist with the transition to end-of-life care for patients with cancer. Methods: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and IEEE to identify relevant articles. We included studies describing ML algorithms predicting <= 1-year mortality in patients of oncology. We used the prediction model risk of bias assessment tool to assess the quality of the included studies. Results: We included 15 articles involving 110,058 patients in the final synthesis. Of the 15 studies, 12 (80%) had a high or unclear risk of bias. The model performance was good: the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve ranged from 0.72 to 0.92. We identified common issues leading to biased models, including using a single performance metric, incomplete reporting of or inappropriate modeling practice, and small sample size. Conclusions: We found encouraging signs of ML performance in predicting short-term cancer mortality. Nevertheless, no included ML algorithms are suitable for clinical practice at the current stage because of the high risk of bias and uncertainty regarding real-world performance. Further research is needed to develop ML models using the modern standards of algorithm development and reporting.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2016, PALL END LIF CAR 201
[2]  
Aromataris E., 2020, JBI manual for Evidence Synthesis, DOI [DOI 10.46658/JBIMES-20-01, 10.46658/JBIMES-20-01, 10.46658/jbimes-20-01]
[3]   Combining statistical techniques to predict postsurgical risk of 1-year mortality for patients with colon cancer [J].
Arostegui, Inmaculada ;
Gonzalez, Nerea ;
Fernandez-de-Larrea, Nerea ;
Lazaro-Aramburu, Santiago ;
Bare, Marisa ;
Redondo, Maximino ;
Sarasqueta, Cristina ;
Garcia-Gutierrez, Susana ;
Quintana, Jose M. .
CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2018, 10 :235-251
[4]   Improving palliative care with deep learning [J].
Avati, Anand ;
Jung, Kenneth ;
Harman, Stephanie ;
Downing, Lance ;
Ng, Andrew ;
Shah, Nigam H. .
BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING, 2018, 18
[5]   The impact of machine learning on patient care: A systematic review [J].
Ben-Israel, David ;
Jacobs, W. Bradley ;
Casha, Steve ;
Lang, Stefan ;
Ryu, Won Hyung A. ;
de Lotbiniere-Bassett, Madeleine ;
Cadotte, David W. .
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN MEDICINE, 2020, 103 (103)
[6]   Development and validation of an optimized prediction of mortality for candidates awaiting liver transplantation [J].
Bertsimas, Dimitris ;
Kung, Jerry ;
Trichakis, Nikolaos ;
Wang, Yuchen ;
Hirose, Ryutaro ;
Vagefi, Parsia A. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2019, 19 (04) :1109-1118
[7]  
Biglarian A, 2011, IRAN J PUBLIC HEALTH, V40, P80
[8]   COVID Mortality Prediction with Machine Learning Methods: A Systematic Review and Critical Appraisal [J].
Bottino, Francesca ;
Tagliente, Emanuela ;
Pasquini, Luca ;
Di Napoli, Alberto ;
Lucignani, Martina ;
Figa-Talamanca, Lorenzo ;
Napolitano, Antonio .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE, 2021, 11 (09)
[9]   Lung cancer and end-of-life care: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of aggressive inpatient care [J].
Bylicki, Olivier ;
Didier, Morgane ;
Riviere, Frederic ;
Margery, Jacques ;
Grassin, Frederic ;
Chouaid, Christos .
BMJ SUPPORTIVE & PALLIATIVE CARE, 2019, 9 (04) :413-424
[10]   SMOTE: Synthetic minority over-sampling technique [J].
Chawla, Nitesh V. ;
Bowyer, Kevin W. ;
Hall, Lawrence O. ;
Kegelmeyer, W. Philip .
2002, American Association for Artificial Intelligence (16)