Comparison of Contrast-Enhanced Multiphase Renal Protocol CT Versus MRI for Diagnosis of Papillary Renal Cell Carcinoma

被引:48
作者
Dilauro, Marc [1 ]
Quon, Matthew [1 ]
McInnes, Matthew D. F. [1 ]
Vakili, Maryam [1 ]
Chung, Andrew [1 ]
Flood, Trevor A. [2 ]
Schieda, Nicola [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ottawa, Ottawa Hosp, Dept Med Imaging, 1053 Carling Ave, Ottawa, ON K1Y 4E9, Canada
[2] Univ Ottawa, Ottawa Hosp, Dept Anat Pathol, Ottawa, ON, Canada
关键词
CT; enhancement; MRI; papillary; renal cell carcinoma; IODINE OVERLAY TECHNIQUE; MULTIDETECTOR CT; CYST PSEUDOENHANCEMENT; MASSES; DIFFERENTIATION; FEATURES; SUBTYPES; TOMOGRAPHY; UTILITY; SINGLE;
D O I
10.2214/AJR.15.14932
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE. The objective of this study was to compare contrast-enhanced (CE) CT with MRI for the diagnosis of papillary renal cell carcinoma (pRCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS. Between 2006 and 2013, a total of 27 pRCCs were assessed using CECT or CE-MRI. A blinded radiologist placed ROIs that measured attenuation on unenhanced CT; corticomedullary and nephrographic phase CECT images, with an attenuation difference of 20 HU or more denoting enhancing lesions, 10-19 HU indicating indeterminate findings, and less than 10 HU denoting nonenhancing lesions. MRI enhancement ratios were calculated as follows: (signal intensity on gadolinium-enhanced image minus signal intensity) / (signal intensity on unenhanced image x 100) for phase 1 (acquired at 30 s), phase 2 (acquired at 70 s), and phase 3 (acquired at 180 s), where a difference of 15% or more denoted enhancement. Two additional blinded radiologists qualitatively assessed tumor margin, homogeneity, and calcification with the use of CT, and they also assessed enhancement with the use of subtraction MRI. A fourth radiologist established consensus. Twenty consecutive hemorrhagic/proteinaceous cysts served as a control group. Statistical analyses were performed using a chi-square test and multivariate regression. RESULTS. There was no statistically significant difference in patient age (p = 0.22), patient sex (p = 0.36), or tumor size (p = 0.29), when pRCCs were compared with hemorrhagic/proteinaceous cysts. On unenhanced CT, attenuation of pRCCs (mean +/- SD, 35.7 +/- 12.9 HU; range, 19-66 HU) was similar to that of hemorrhagic/proteinaceous cysts (mean, 38.9 +/- 16.9; range, 8-71 HU) (p = 0.48). A total of 51.9% of pRCCs (14/27) had either absent or indeterminate enhancement on corticomedullary phase CECT images (mean attenuation difference, 23.2 +/- 20.3 HU; range, 6-105 HU), and 14.8% of pRCCs (4/27) had indeterminate enhancement on nephrographic phase CECT images (mean attenuation difference, 36.4 +/- 24.9; range, 10-128 HU). No pRCC was nonenhancing on nephrographic phase CECT. Qualitatively, pRCCs were more heterogeneous (80% vs 45%; p = 0.02; kappa = 0.24), irregular (50% vs 5%; p < 0.001; kappa = 0.21), and calcified (25% vs 0%; p = 0.004; kappa = 0.67), with overlap existing between hemorrhagic/proteinaceous cysts. On CE-MRI, all pRCCs were quantitatively enhanced by phase 2 (95.4 +/- 83.1; percentage change in signal intensity ratio, 16-450%) and qualitatively enhanced after consensus review. No hemorrhagic/proteinaceous cyst enhanced on MRI when quantitative or subjective analysis was performed. CONCLUSION. A small number of pRCCs have indeterminate enhancement when renal protocol CT is used. Heterogeneity, irregular margins, and calcification are suggestive diagnostic features; however, quantitative and qualitative CE-MRI can accurately differentiate hemorrhagic/proteinaceous cysts from pRCC.
引用
收藏
页码:319 / 325
页数:7
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [11] Dual-Energy Multidetector CT: How Does It Work, What Can It Tell Us, and When Can We Use It in Abdominopelvic Imaging?
    Coursey, Courtney A.
    Nelson, Rendon C.
    Boll, Daniel T.
    Paulson, Erik K.
    Ho, Lisa M.
    Neville, Amy M.
    Marin, Daniele
    Gupta, Rajan T.
    Schindera, Sebastian T.
    [J]. RADIOGRAPHICS, 2010, 30 (04) : 1037 - 1055
  • [12] Delahunt B, 1997, MODERN PATHOL, V10, P537
  • [13] Differentiation of Papillary Renal Cell Carcinoma Subtypes on CT and MRI
    Egbert, Nathan D.
    Caoili, Elaine M.
    Cohan, Richard H.
    Davenport, Matthew S.
    Francis, Isaac R.
    Kunju, L. Priya
    Ellis, James H.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2013, 201 (02) : 347 - 355
  • [14] Gokan Takehiko, 2002, Radiat Med, V20, P187
  • [15] Single-Phase Dual- Energy CT Allows for Characterization of Renal Masses as Benign or Malignant
    Graser, Anno
    Becker, Christoph R.
    Staehler, Michael
    Clevert, Dirk A.
    Macari, Michael
    Arndt, Niko
    Nikolaou, Konstantin
    Sommer, Wieland
    Stief, Christian
    Reiser, Maximilian F.
    Johnson, Thorsten R. C.
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2010, 45 (07) : 399 - 405
  • [16] Renal masses: Quantitative analysis of enhancement with signal intensity measurements versus qualitative analysis of enhancement with image subtraction for diagnosing malignancy at MR imaging
    Hecht, EM
    Israel, GM
    Krinsky, GA
    Hahn, WY
    Kim, DC
    Belitskaya-Levy, I
    Lee, VS
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2004, 232 (02) : 373 - 378
  • [17] ACR Appropriateness Criteria Indeterminate Renal Mass
    Heilbrun, Marta E.
    Remer, Erick M.
    Casalino, David D.
    Beland, Michael D.
    Bishoff, Jay T.
    Blaufox, M. Donald
    Coursey, Courtney A.
    Goldfarb, Stanley
    Harvin, Howard J.
    Nikolaidis, Paul
    Preminger, Glenn M.
    Raman, Steven S.
    Sahni, Anik
    Vikram, Raghunandan
    Weinfeld, Robert M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2015, 12 (04) : 333 - 341
  • [18] Pseudoenhancement of simple renal cysts: A comparison of single and multidetector helical CT
    Heneghan, JP
    Spielmann, AL
    Sheafor, DH
    Kliewer, MA
    DeLong, DM
    Nelson, RC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2002, 26 (01) : 90 - 94
  • [19] Renal masses: Quantitative assessment of enhancement with dynamic MR imaging
    Ho, VB
    Allen, SF
    Hood, MN
    Choyke, PL
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2002, 224 (03) : 695 - 700
  • [20] Pitfalls in renal mass evaluation and how to avoid them
    Israel, Gary M.
    Bosniak, Morton A.
    [J]. RADIOGRAPHICS, 2008, 28 (05) : 1325 - 1338