The effect of agri-environment schemes on bees on Shropshire farms

被引:10
作者
Crowther, Lucy, I [1 ,2 ]
Gilbert, Francis [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nottingham, Sch Life Sci, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England
[2] Univ Lancaster, Lancaster Environm Ctr, Lancaster LA1 4YW, England
关键词
Agri-environment schemes; Bees; Ecosystem services; Field margins; Floral resources; Pollination; PROVIDING FORAGING RESOURCES; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; FARMLAND; POLLINATORS; DIVERSITY; ABUNDANCE; HABITATS; BENEFITS; CONSERVATION; LANDSCAPES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jnc.2020.125895
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
The decline of bees and other invertebrate pollinators is cause for global concern, with modern intensive agriculture identified as a key driver. Government-run agri-environment schemes (AES) have the potential to restore the local landscape to benefit bees. Bee abundance, species richness and foraged plants were surveyed over a season on 18 farms in Shropshire, UK, classified into three treatment groups for comparison: Conventional, Entry-Level Stewardship AES (ELS), and Higher-Level Stewardship AES (HLS). Bee abundance and species diversity were significantly higher on AES-compliant farms: there were only small or non-significant differences between ELS- and HLS-compliant farms. ELS and HLS farms had higher diversity of floral foraging resources than conventionally managed farms. Cirsium, Heracleum sphondylium, and Rubus fruticosus were important resources for bees through the season. Synthesis and applications: These results highlight that key ELS actions, such as set-aside of uncultivated field margins, hedgerow restoration, late-cut meadows and sowing of nectar-rich flower mixes, are effective AES options to improve the landscape for bee communities. Many plants considered agricultural weeds are important forage resources for bees.Y
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]   The stability-complexity relationship at age 40: a random matrix perspective [J].
Allesina, Stefano ;
Tang, Si .
POPULATION ECOLOGY, 2015, 57 (01) :63-75
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2018, R LANG ENV STAT COMP
[3]   Landscape-scale responses of birds to agri-environment management: a test of the English Environmental Stewardship scheme [J].
Baker, David J. ;
Freeman, Stephen N. ;
Grice, Phil V. ;
Siriwardena, Gavin M. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2012, 49 (04) :871-882
[4]   Synergistic impacts of habitat loss and fragmentation on model ecosystems [J].
Bartlett, Lewis J. ;
Newbold, Tim ;
Purves, Drew W. ;
Tittensor, Derek P. ;
Harfoot, Michael B. J. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2016, 283 (1839)
[5]   The role of agri-environment schemes in conservation and environmental management [J].
Batary, Peter ;
Dicks, Lynn V. ;
Kleijn, David ;
Sutherland, William J. .
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2015, 29 (04) :1006-1016
[6]   Effects of Fungicide and Herbicide Chemical Exposure on Apis and Non-Apis Bees in Agricultural Landscape [J].
Belsky, Joseph ;
Joshi, Neelendra K. .
FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2020, 8
[7]   Costing conservation: an expert appraisal of the pollinator habitat benefits of England's entry level stewardship [J].
Breeze, T. D. ;
Bailey, A. P. ;
Balcombe, K. G. ;
Potts, S. G. .
BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 2014, 23 (05) :1193-1214
[8]   Weeds for bees? A review [J].
Bretagnolle, Vincent ;
Gaba, Sabrina .
AGRONOMY FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2015, 35 (03) :891-909
[9]   Agri-environment scheme enhances small mammal diversity and abundance at the farm-scale [J].
Broughton, Richard K. ;
Shore, Richard F. ;
Heard, Matthew S. ;
Amy, Sam R. ;
Meek, William R. ;
Redhead, John W. ;
Turk, Anthony ;
Pywell, Richard F. .
AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2014, 192 :122-129
[10]   Comparing the efficacy of agri-environment schemes to enhance bumble bee abundance and diversity on arable field margins [J].
Carvell, C. ;
Meek, W. R. ;
Pywell, R. F. ;
Goulson, D. ;
Nowakowski, M. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2007, 44 (01) :29-40