Identifying Ethical Considerations for Machine Learning Healthcare Applications

被引:194
作者
Char, Danton S. [1 ]
Abramoff, Michael D. [2 ,3 ]
Feudtner, Chris [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Univ Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
[3] Digital Diagnost, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Univ Penn, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[5] Childrens Hosp Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Artificial intelligence; effectiveness; ethics; machine learning; safety; test characteristics; ARTIFICIAL-INTELLIGENCE; BIG DATA;
D O I
10.1080/15265161.2020.1819469
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Along with potential benefits to healthcare delivery, machine learning healthcare applications (ML-HCAs) raise a number of ethical concerns. Ethical evaluations of ML-HCAs will need to structure the overall problem of evaluating these technologies, especially for a diverse group of stakeholders. This paper outlines a systematic approach to identifying ML-HCA ethical concerns, starting with a conceptual model of the pipeline of the conception, development, implementation of ML-HCAs, and the parallel pipeline of evaluation and oversight tasks at each stage. Over this model, we layer key questions that raise value-based issues, along with ethical considerations identified in large part by a literature review, but also identifying some ethical considerations that have yet to receive attention. This pipeline model framework will be useful for systematic ethical appraisals of ML-HCA from development through implementation, and for interdisciplinary collaboration of diverse stakeholders that will be required to understand and subsequently manage the ethical implications of ML-HCAs.
引用
收藏
页码:7 / 17
页数:11
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]   The Use of Artificially Intelligent Self-Diagnosing Digital Platforms by the General Public: Scoping Review [J].
Aboueid, Stephanie ;
Liu, Rebecca H. ;
Desta, Binyam Negussie ;
Chaurasia, Ashok ;
Ebrahim, Shanil .
JMIR MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2019, 7 (02) :4-14
[2]   Pivotal trial of an autonomous AI-based diagnostic system for detection of diabetic retinopathy in primary care offices [J].
Abramoff, Michael D. ;
Lavin, Philip T. ;
Birch, Michele ;
Shah, Nilay ;
Folk, James C. .
NPJ DIGITAL MEDICINE, 2018, 1
[3]  
Amarasingham Ruben, 2016, EGEMS (Wash DC), V4, P1163, DOI 10.13063/2327-9214.1163
[4]  
Angwin Julia, 2016, ProPublica
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2011, CAMBRIDGE HDB ARTIFI
[6]   The need for uncertainty quantification in machine-assisted medical decision making [J].
Begoli, Edmon ;
Bhattacharya, Tanmoy ;
Kusnezov, Dimitri .
NATURE MACHINE INTELLIGENCE, 2019, 1 (01) :20-23
[7]   Artificial intelligence and medical imaging 2018: French Radiology Community white paper [J].
Beregi, Jean-Paul .
DIAGNOSTIC AND INTERVENTIONAL IMAGING, 2018, 99 (11) :727-742
[8]  
Bledsoe Marianna J, 2013, Diagn Histopathol (Oxf), V19, P322
[9]   Anticipatory Ethics for Emerging Technologies [J].
Brey, Philip A. E. .
NANOETHICS, 2012, 6 (01) :1-13
[10]   Artificial intelligence, bias and clinical safety [J].
Challen, Robert ;
Denny, Joshua ;
Pitt, Martin ;
Gompels, Luke ;
Edwards, Tom ;
Tsaneva-Atanasova, Krasimira .
BMJ QUALITY & SAFETY, 2019, 28 (03) :231-237