Comparison of four different treatment modalities in Stage IIA cervical cancer: single center experience of 22 years

被引:0
作者
Gokcu, M. [1 ]
Gungorduk, K. [1 ]
Gulseven, V. [2 ]
Kocaer, M. [2 ]
Gungorduk, O. [2 ]
Sanci, M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Tepecik Educ & Res Hosp, Dept Gynecol Oncol, Izmir, Turkey
[2] Tepecik Educ & Res Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Izmir, Turkey
关键词
Cervical cancer; Treatment modalities; Radiotherapy; Radical hysterectomy; SURVIVAL; SURGERY;
D O I
10.12892/ejgo3958.2018
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy and the survival rate depending on different treatment modalities in FIGO Stage IIA cervical cancer. Materials and Methods: The authors identified 59 FIGO Stage IIa patients from 844 cervical cancer patients who were treated between January, 1992 and February, 2014. Medical records were retrospectively reviewed and patients were classified according to four different treatment modalities and compared regarding complications, recurrence, and overall survival rates. Results: Fifty-nine (6.99%) of the 844 cervix cancer patients were at FIGO Stage IIA. Fourteen patients received primary radiotherapy (RT), 27 patients primary chemoradiotherapy (CRT), ten patients had radical hysterectomy followed by adjuvant RT, and eight patients had radical hysterectomy followed by adjuvant CRT. Five-year overall survival rates among the primary RT, primary CRT, adjuvant RT after radical hysterectomy (RH), and adjuvant CRT after RH groups were found to be 55.6%, 72.7%, 62.5%, and 71.4% (p = 0.802), respectively and five-year disease free survival rates of these groups were found to be 71.4%, 88.9% , 80% , and 87.5% (p = 0.537), respectively. Conclusion: No statistically significant difference was identified regarding the efficacy and the rate of survival among four different treatment modalities in Stage IIa cervical cancer patients.
引用
收藏
页码:108 / 111
页数:4
相关论文
共 5 条
  • [1] Ferlay J., 2013, GLOBOCAN 2012 CANC I
  • [2] Completion Surgery After Concomitant Chemoradiation in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer: A Comprehensive Analysis of Pattern of Postoperative Complications
    Ferrandina, Gabriella
    Ercoli, Alfredo
    Fagotti, Anna
    Fanfani, Francesco
    Gallotta, Valerio
    Margariti, Alessandro P.
    Salerno, Maria Giovanna
    Chiantera, Vito
    Legge, Francesco
    Macchia, Gabriella
    Morganti, Alessio G.
    Valentini, Vincenzo
    Scambia, Giovanni
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 21 (05) : 1692 - 1699
  • [3] Stage IIA1 Versus Stage IIA2 Cervical Cancer Does the New Staging Criteria Predict Survival?
    Garg, Gunjal
    Shah, Jay P.
    Toy, Eugene P.
    Christensen, Carl
    Deppe, Gunter
    Asaad, Radwan
    Morris, Robert T.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2011, 21 (04) : 711 - 716
  • [4] Locoregional Spread and Survival of Stage IIA1 versus Stage IIA2 Cervical Cancer
    Hongladaromp, Waroonsiri
    Tantipalakorn, Charuwan
    Charoenkwan, Kittipat
    Srisomboon, Jatupol
    [J]. ASIAN PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CANCER PREVENTION, 2014, 15 (02) : 887 - 890
  • [5] IRRADIATION ALONE OR COMBINED WITH SURGERY IN STAGE IB, IIA, AND IIB CARCINOMA OF UTERINE CERVIX - UPDATE OF A NONRANDOMIZED COMPARISON
    PEREZ, CA
    GRIGSBY, PW
    CAMEL, HM
    GALAKATOS, AE
    MUTCH, D
    LOCKETT, MA
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1995, 31 (04): : 703 - 716