Assessment of in vitro human dermal absorption studies on pesticides to determine default values, opportunities for read-across and influence of dilution on absorption

被引:18
作者
Aggarwal, M. [1 ]
Battalora, M. [2 ]
Fisher, P. [3 ]
Hueser, A. [4 ]
Parr-Dobrzanski, R. [5 ]
Soufi, M. [6 ]
Mostert, V. [4 ]
Strupp, C. [7 ]
Whalley, P. [5 ]
Wiemann, C. [8 ]
Billington, R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Dow AgroSci Ltd, Abingdon 0X14 4RN, Oxon, England
[2] EI du Pont de Nemours & Co, DuPont Crop Protect, Stine Haskell Res Ctr, Newark, DE 19714 USA
[3] Bayer SAS, Bayer CropSci, F-06906 Sophia Antipolis, France
[4] Dr Knoell Consult GmbH, D-51377 Leverkusen, Germany
[5] Syngenta Ltd, Bracknell RG42 6EY, Berks, England
[6] DuPont de Nemours GmbH Deutschland, D-63263 Neu Isenburg, Germany
[7] Makhteshim Agan Europe, Makhteshim Agan Holding BV, Schaffhausen, Switzerland
[8] BASF Oesterreich GmbH, A-1200 Vienna, Austria
关键词
Dermal absorption; In vitro; Human skin; Plant protection products; Agrochemicals; Pesticides; EXPOSURE; SKIN;
D O I
10.1016/j.yrtph.2014.01.012
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律]; R [医药、卫生];
学科分类号
0301 ; 10 ;
摘要
Dermal absorption is an integral part of non-dietary human safety risk assessments for agrochemicals. Typically, dermal absorption data for agrochemical active substances are generated from the undiluted formulation concentrate and its spray dilutions. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) guidance, which combines highly conservative default values, very limited opportunities for read-across from existing data and other overly conservative conclusions, was the driver for this assessment. To investigate the reliability of the EFSA guidance, a homogeneous data-set of 190 GLP and OECD guideline compliant in vitro human skin studies, chosen to match the test method preferred by EU data requirements, was evaluated. These studies represented a wide range of active substances, formulation types, and concentrations. In alignment with EFSA guidance on human exposure assessment, a conservative estimate of absorption (95th percentile) was chosen to define defaults, which were also based on the EFSA worst-case assumption that all material in skin, excluding the first two tape strips, is absorbed. The analysis supports dermal absorption defaults of 6% for liquid concentrates, 2% for solid concentrates, and 30% for all spray dilutions, irrespective of the active substance concentration. Relatively high dermal absorption values for organic solvent-based formulations, compared to water-based or solid concentrates, support their use as worst-case surrogate data for read-across to other formulation types. The current review also shows that dermal absorption of sprays does not increase linearly with increasing dilution, and provides a novel, science-based option for extrapolation from existing data. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:412 / 423
页数:12
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] Scientific Opinion on Preparation of a Guidance Document on Pesticide Exposure Assessment for Workers, Operators, Bystanders and Residents EFSA Panel on Plant Protection Products and their Residues (PPR)
    Alix, Anne
    Boesten, Jos
    Bolognesi, Claudia
    Brock, Theo
    Capri, Ettore
    Hardy, Anthony
    Hart, Andy
    Hirsch-Ernst, Karen Ildico
    Hougaard-Bennekou, Susanne
    Luttik, Robert
    Moretto, Angelo
    Ossendorp, Bernadette
    Petersen, Annette
    Pico, Yolanda
    Schaeffer, Andreas
    Sousa, Jose Paulo
    Steurbaut, Walter
    Stromberg, Anita
    Tasheva, Maria
    Van Der Linden, Ton
    Vleminckx, Christiane
    [J]. EFSA JOURNAL, 2010, 8 (02)
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2011, EFSA J, DOI DOI 10.2903/J.EFSA.2011.2294
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2006, Environmental Health Criteria, V235
  • [4] [Anonymous], GUID DOC DERM ABS
  • [5] Skin sensitisation and epidermal disposition: The relevance of epidermal disposition for sensitisation hazard identification and risk assessment - The report and recommendations of ECVAM Workshop 59
    Basketter, David
    Pease, Camilla
    Kasting, Gerald
    Kimber, Ian
    Casati, Silvia
    Cronin, Mark
    Diembeck, Walter
    Gerberick, Frank
    Hadgraft, Jonathan
    Hartung, Thomas
    Marty, Jean Paul
    Nikolaidis, Efstathios
    Patlewicz, Grace
    Roberts, David
    Roggen, Erwin
    Rovida, Costanza
    van de Sandt, Johannes
    [J]. ATLA-ALTERNATIVES TO LABORATORY ANIMALS, 2007, 35 (01): : 137 - 154
  • [6] Baynes RE, 2010, HAYES' HANDBOOK OF PESTICIDE TOXICOLOGY, VOLS 1 AND 2, 3RD EDITION, P877, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-374367-1.00037-9
  • [7] Guidance on Dermal Absorption EFSA Panel on Plant Protection Products and their Residues (PPR)
    Boesten, Jos
    Bolognesi, Claudia
    Brock, Theo
    Capri, Ettore
    Hardy, Anthony
    Hart, Andrew
    Hirsch-Ernst, Karen Ildico
    Bennekou, Susanne Hougaard
    Klein, Michael
    Luttik, Robert
    Machera, Kyriaki
    Moretto, Angelo
    Ossendorp, Bernadette
    Petersen, Annette
    Pico, Yolanda
    Schaeffer, Andreas
    Sousa, Paulo
    Steurbaut, Walter
    Stroemberg, Anita
    Tasheva, Maria
    van der Linden, Ton
    Vleminckx, Christiane
    [J]. EFSA JOURNAL, 2012, 10 (04)
  • [8] Transdermal penetration of atrazine, alachlor, and trifluralin: Effect of formulation
    Brand, RM
    Mueller, C
    [J]. TOXICOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2002, 68 (01) : 18 - 23
  • [9] Skin Basement Membrane: The Foundation of Epidermal Integrity-BM Functions and Diverse Roles of Bridging Molecules Nidogen and Perlecan
    Breitkreutz, Dirk
    Koxholt, Isabell
    Thiemann, Kathrin
    Nischt, Roswitha
    [J]. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 2013
  • [10] Relative absorption and dermal loading of chemical substances: Consequences for risk assessment
    Buist, Harrie E.
    Schaafsma, Gerwin
    van de Sandt, Johannes J. M.
    [J]. REGULATORY TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2009, 54 (03) : 221 - 228