Understanding Uncertainties in Future Colorado River Streamflow

被引:146
作者
Vano, Julie A. [1 ]
Udall, Bradley [2 ]
Cayan, Daniel R. [3 ,4 ]
Overpeck, Jonathan T. [5 ]
Brekke, Levi D. [6 ]
Das, Tapash [3 ]
Hartmann, Holly C. [7 ]
Hidalgo, Hugo G. [3 ]
Hoerling, Martin [8 ]
McCabe, Gregory J. [9 ]
Morino, Kiyomi [10 ]
Webb, Robert S. [8 ]
Werner, Kevin [11 ]
Lettenmaier, Dennis P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[2] Univ Colorado, Western Water Assessment, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
[3] Univ Calif San Diego, Scripps Inst Oceanog, Div Climate Atmospher Sci & Phys Oceanog, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
[4] US Geol Survey, La Jolla, CA USA
[5] Univ Arizona, Inst Environm, Tucson, AZ USA
[6] US Bur Reclamat, Denver, CO 80225 USA
[7] Univ Arizona, Arid Lands Informat Ctr, Tucson, AZ USA
[8] NOAA, Earth Syst Res Lab, Boulder, CO USA
[9] US Geol Survey, Denver, CO 80225 USA
[10] Univ Arizona, Tree Ring Res Lab, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
[11] Colorado Basin River Forecast Ctr, Natl Weather Serv, Salt Lake City, UT USA
关键词
CLIMATE-CHANGE; DROUGHT VARIABILITY; TROPICAL PACIFIC; NORTH-AMERICA; MODEL; PRECIPITATION; HYDROLOGY; RECONSTRUCTIONS; HYDROCLIMATE; TEMPERATURE;
D O I
10.1175/BAMS-D-12-00228.1
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
The Colorado River is the primary water source for more than 30 million people in the United States and Mexico. Recent studies that project streamf low changes in the Colorado River all project annual declines, but the magnitude of the projected decreases range from less than 10% to 45% by the mid-twenty-first century. To understand these differences, we address the questions the management community has raised: Why is there such a wide range of projections of impacts of future climate change on Colorado River streamflow, and how should this uncertainty be interpreted? We identify four major sources of disparities among studies that arise from both methodological and model differences. In order of importance, these are differences in 1) the global climate models (GCMs) and emission scenarios used; 2) the ability of land surface and atmospheric models to simulate properly the high-elevation runoff source areas; 3) the sensitivities of land surface hydrology models to precipitation and temperature changes; and 4) the methods used to statistically downscale GCM scenarios. In accounting for these differences, there is substantial evidence across studies that future Colorado River streamflow will be reduced under the current trajectories of anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions because of a combination of strong temperature-induced runoff curtailment and reduced annual precipitation. Reconstructions of preinstrumental streamflows provide additional insights; the greatest risk to Colorado River streamf lows is a multidecadal drought, like that observed in paleoreconstructions, exacerbated by a steady reduction in flows due to climate change. This could result in decades of sustained streamflows much lower than have been observed in the ~100 years of instrumental record.
引用
收藏
页码:59 / 78
页数:20
相关论文
共 76 条
  • [1] A comparison of statistical downscaling methods suited for wildfire applications
    Abatzoglou, John T.
    Brown, Timothy J.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLIMATOLOGY, 2012, 32 (05) : 772 - 780
  • [2] The amplitude of decadal to multidecadal variability in precipitation simulated by state-of-the-art climate models
    Ault, T. R.
    Cole, J. E.
    George, S. St.
    [J]. GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2012, 39
  • [3] The Continuum of Hydroclimate Variability in Western North America during the Last Millennium
    Ault, Toby R.
    Cole, Julia E.
    Overpeck, Jonathan T.
    Pederson, Gregory T.
    St George, Scott
    Otto-Bliesner, Bette
    Woodhouse, Connie A.
    Deser, Clara
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2013, 26 (16) : 5863 - 5878
  • [4] When will Lake Mead go dry?
    Barnett, Tim P.
    Pierce, David W.
    [J]. WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2008, 44 (03)
  • [5] Sustainable water deliveries from the Colorado River in a changing climate
    Barnett, Tim P.
    Pierce, David W.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2009, 106 (18) : 7334 - 7338
  • [6] Brown C., 2012, EOS T AM GEOPHYS UN, V93, P401, DOI DOI 10.1029/2012EO410001
  • [7] Future dryness in the southwest US and the hydrology of the early 21st century drought
    Cayan, Daniel R.
    Das, Tapash
    Pierce, David W.
    Barnett, Tim P.
    Tyree, Mary
    Gershunov, Alexander
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2010, 107 (50) : 21271 - 21276
  • [8] Christensen N., 2007, HYDROL EARTH SYSTSCI, V3, P1
  • [9] The effects of climate change on the hydrology and water resources of the Colorado River basin
    Christensen, NS
    Wood, AW
    Voisin, N
    Lettenmaier, DP
    Palmer, RN
    [J]. CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2004, 62 (1-3) : 337 - 363
  • [10] Variable oceanic influences on western North American drought over the last 1200 years
    Conroy, Jessica L.
    Overpeck, Jonathan T.
    Cole, Julia E.
    Steinitz-Kannan, Miriam
    [J]. GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2009, 36