An optimal stochastic control framework for determining the cost of hedging of variable annuities

被引:31
作者
Forsyth, Peter [1 ]
Vetzal, Kenneth [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Waterloo, Cheriton Sch Comp Sci, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
[2] Univ Waterloo, Sch Accounting & Finance, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Optimal control; GLWB pricing; PDE approach; Regime switching; No-arbitrage; Withdrawal strategies; WITHDRAWAL BENEFIT; OPTION VALUATION; REGIME; GUARANTEES; VOLATILITY; CONTRACTS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jedc.2014.04.005
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
An implicit partial differential equation (PDE) method is used to determine the cost of hedging for a Guaranteed Lifelong Withdrawal Benefit (GLWB) variable annuity contract. In the basic setting, the underlying risky asset is assumed to evolve according to geometric Brownian motion, but this is generalised to the case of a Markov regime switching process. A similarity transformation is used to reduce a pricing problem with K regimes to the solution of K coupled one dimensional PDEs, resulting in a considerable gain in computational efficiency. The methodology developed is flexible in the sense that it can calculate the cost of hedging for a variety of different withdrawal strategies by investors. Cases considered here include both optimal withdrawal strategies (i.e. strategies which generate the highest possible cost of hedging for the insurer) and sub-optimal withdrawal strategies in which the policy holder's decisions depend on the moneyness of the embedded options. Numerical results are presented which demonstrate the sensitivity of the cost of hedging (given the withdrawal specification) to various economic and contractual assumptions. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:29 / 53
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1998, The Journal of Dervitavies, DOI DOI 10.3905/JOD.1998.408011
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1995, Hidden Markov Models: Estimation and Control
  • [3] Azimzadeh P., 2013, THESIS U WATERLOO CH
  • [4] Variable annuities: A unifying valuation approach
    Bacinello, Anna Rita
    Millossovich, Pietro
    Olivieri, Annamaria
    Pitacco, Ermanno
    [J]. INSURANCE MATHEMATICS & ECONOMICS, 2011, 49 (03) : 285 - 297
  • [5] A UNIVERSAL PRICING FRAMEWORK FOR GUARANTEED MINIMUM BENEFITS IN VARIABLE ANNUITIES
    Bauer, Daniel
    Kling, Alexander
    Russ, Jochen
    [J]. ASTIN BULLETIN, 2008, 38 (02): : 621 - 651
  • [6] Belanger A., 2009, Applied Mathematical Finance, V16, P451
  • [7] The effect of modelling parameters on the value of GMWB guarantees
    Chen, Z.
    Vetzal, K.
    Forsyth, P. A.
    [J]. INSURANCE MATHEMATICS & ECONOMICS, 2008, 43 (01) : 165 - 173
  • [8] Cramer E., 2007, PARCTICE NOTE
  • [9] Guaranteed minimum withdrawal benefit in variable annuities
    Dai, Min
    Kwok, Yue Kuen
    Zong, Jianping
    [J]. MATHEMATICAL FINANCE, 2008, 18 (04) : 595 - 611
  • [10] Valuing guaranteed withdrawal benefits with stochastic interest rates and volatility
    Donnelly, Ryan
    Jaimungal, Sebastian
    Rubisov, Dmitri H.
    [J]. QUANTITATIVE FINANCE, 2014, 14 (02) : 369 - 382