ASSESSING THE CONSTRUCT VALIDITY OF THE GLOBAL 100 SUSTAINABILITY RANKING FOR SCHOOLS OF BUSINESS

被引：0

作者：

McLaughlin, Gerald W. ^{[1
]}

McLaughlin, Josetta S. ^{[2
]}

机构：

[1] Depaul Univ, Chicago, IL 60605 USA

[2] Roosevelt Univ, Walter E Heller Coll Business Adm, Schaumburg, IL 60173 USA

来源：

PROCEEDINGS OF THE TWENTY-SECOND ANNUAL MEETING OF THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR BUSINESS AND SOCIETY | 2011年 / 22卷

关键词：

construct validity; sustainability; ranking;

D O I：

暂无

中图分类号：

F [经济];

学科分类号：

02 ;

摘要：

Colleges of business rankings purport to address relative performance on programs such as sustainability. The primary criticism of rankings is that providers have not established reliability or validity of the ranking. This study examines whether The Global 100 sustainability ranking is sufficiently unique to claim that it is based on attributes not used for non-sustainability ranking (divergent validity) and whether it is appropriately related to independent characteristics expected to measure this attribute (convergent validity).

引用

页码：274 / 286

页数：13

共 14 条

[1]

[Anonymous], 2011, U.S. News and World Report

[2]

[Anonymous], CHRONICLE HIGHER ED

[3] CONVERGENT AND DISCRIMINANT VALIDATION BY THE MULTITRAIT-MULTIMETHOD MATRIX [J].

CAMPBELL, DT ;

FISKE, DW .

PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1959, 56 (02) :81-105

[4]

Gilbert J., 1995, EVALUATING RESPONDIN, V88

[5]

Hunter B., 1995, Evaluating and responding to college guidebooks and rankings

[6]

Jaschik J., 2010, INSIDE HIGHER ED

[7]

McGuire M. D., 1995, EVALUATING RESPONDIN, V88

[8]

McLaughlin G. W., 1989, CAUSE EFFECT, V12, P19

[9]

Methodology, GREY PINSTR

[10]

Myers L., 2009, COLL RANKINGS HIST C

← 1 2 →