Multi-objective genetic algorithms for solving portfolio optimization problems in the electricity market

被引:34
作者
Suksonghong, Karoon [1 ,2 ]
Boonlong, Kittipong [3 ]
Goh, Kim-Leng [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Malaya, Fac Econ & Adm, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia
[2] Burapha Univ, Dept Accounting & Finance, Chon Buri 20131, Thailand
[3] Burapha Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Chon Buri 20131, Thailand
关键词
Genetic algorithms; Multi-objective optimization; Portfolio optimization; Skewness; Asset management; Electricity market; VARIANCE-SKEWNESS MODEL; EVOLUTIONARY ALGORITHMS; ALLOCATION; RISK; SELECTION; SEARCH; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijepes.2014.01.014
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
The multi-objective portfolio optimization problem is not easy to solve because of (i) challenges from the complexity that arises due to conflicting objectives, (ii) high occurrence of non-dominance of solutions based on the dominance relation, and (iii) optimization solutions that often result in under-diversification. This paper experiments the use of multi-objective genetic algorithms (MOGAs), namely, the non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm II (NSGA-II), strength Pareto evolutionary algorithm 11 (SPEA-II) and newly proposed compressed objective genetic algorithm II (COCA-II) for solving the portfolio optimization problem for a power generation company (GenCo) faced with different trading choices. To avoid under-diversification, an additional objective to enhance the diversification benefit is proposed alongside with the three original objectives of the mean-variance-skewness (MVS) portfolio framework. The results show that MOGAs have made possible the inclusion of the fourth objective within the optimization framework that produces Pareto fronts that also cover those based on the traditional MVS framework, thereby offering better trade-off solutions while promoting investment diversification benefits for power generation companies. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:150 / 159
页数:10
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]   The mean-variance cardinality constrained portfolio optimization problem: An experimental evaluation of five multiobjective evolutionary algorithms [J].
Anagnostopoulos, K. P. ;
Mamanis, G. .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2011, 38 (11) :14208-14217
[2]  
[Anonymous], ANN EN OUTL 2011 PRO
[3]   RISK AND REQUIRED RETURN ON EQUITY [J].
ARDITTI, FD .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 1967, 22 (01) :19-36
[4]   ALLOCATION OF WEALTH TO RISKY ASSETS - ASSET STRUCTURE OF INDIVIDUAL PORTFOLIOS AND SOME IMPLICATIONS FOR UTILITY FUNCTIONS [J].
BLUME, ME ;
FRIEND, I .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 1975, 30 (02) :585-603
[5]  
Boonlong K, 2010, ICEC 2010: PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, P95
[6]   NO NEWS IS GOOD-NEWS - AN ASYMMETRIC MODEL OF CHANGING VOLATILITY IN STOCK RETURNS [J].
CAMPBELL, JY ;
HENTSCHEL, L .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 1992, 31 (03) :281-318
[7]   Portfolio optimization problems in different risk measures using genetic algorithm [J].
Chang, Tun-Jen ;
Yang, Sang-Chin ;
Chang, Kuang-Jung .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2009, 36 (07) :10529-10537
[9]   Portfolio selection and skewness: Evidence from international stock markets [J].
Chunhachinda, P ;
Dandapani, K ;
Hamid, S ;
Prakash, AJ .
JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 1997, 21 (02) :143-167
[10]  
Coello Coello CA., 1999, KNOWL INF SYST, V1, P269, DOI [10.1007/BF03325101, DOI 10.1007/BF03325101]