Using PCR-RFLP for sexing of the endangered Galapagos petrel (Pterodroma phaeopygia)

被引:5
作者
Patino, L. [1 ,2 ]
Cruz, M. [1 ,3 ]
Martinez, P. [1 ,4 ]
Cedeno-Escobar, V. [1 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Lab Epidemiol Patol & Genet Galapagos, Isla Santa Cruz, Galapagos, Ecuador
[2] Univ Leeds, Fac Biol Sci, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[3] Agencia Regulac & Control Bioseguridad & Cuarente, Isla Santa Cruz, Galapagos, Ecuador
[4] Wageningen Univ, NL-6700 AP Wageningen, Netherlands
[5] Univ Guayaquil, Programa Biotecnol, Guayaquil, Ecuador
[6] Concepto Azul, Guayaquil, Ecuador
来源
GENETICS AND MOLECULAR RESEARCH | 2013年 / 12卷 / 04期
关键词
Pterodroma phaeopygia; Bird sexing; Galapagos petrel; Avian management; Avian conservation; IDENTIFICATION; CONSERVATION; DNA; BIOLOGY; BIRDS; WILD;
D O I
10.4238/2013.October.18.13
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Pterodroma phaeopygia is a critically endangered avian species of the Galapagos Islands. This bird is sexually monomorphic, making it difficult to identify the sex. This information, however, is relevant to studies of behavior, ecology, and management of wild or captive populations. Here, we aimed to implement a molecular approach for determining sex in this petrel. DNA was extracted from the blood and the feathers of 24 adult P. phaeopygia, with samples from a female and a male Gallus gallus for comparison. We amplified the cromo-helicase DNA binding protein 1 (CHD-1) gene by PCR, using primers P2 and P8. Allele CHD-1W is unique to females and CHD-1Z occurs in both sexes. We then digested these PCR products using the restriction enzyme HaeIII. The PCR amplified a 400-bp product for both alleles. The digestion of the G. gallus, amplicons split the CHD-1Z allele into two fragments (of 320 and 80 bp), while CHD-1W remained intact. Thus, the male exhibited two bands (digested CHD-1Z) and the female three bands (undigested CHD-1W and digested CHD-1Z). Applying this RFLP method on DNA derived from blood, 9 of the 24 petrels were found to be male, while 15 were females. The same results were obtained using feathers as the source of DNA. To our knowledge, this is the first report of molecular method for sexing this species. The potential of sexing this petrel from feathers is remarkable as it minimizes blood sampling induced stress. This method could be used to reinforce the conservation efforts for this bird, to investigate population sex ratios and to develop new conservation strategies.
引用
收藏
页码:4760 / 4767
页数:8
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   Comparison of different procedures of DNA analysis for sex identification in the endangered bearded vulture (Gypaetus barbatus) [J].
Belen Garcia, Cristina ;
Antonio Insausti, Jesus ;
Antonio Gil, Juan ;
de Frutos, Angel ;
Alcantara, Manuel ;
Gonzalez, Javier ;
Rebeca Cortes, Maria ;
Ignacio Bonafonte, Jose ;
Victoria Arruga, Maria .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE RESEARCH, 2009, 55 (03) :309-312
[2]   Isolation of genomic DNA from feathers [J].
Bello, N ;
Francino, O ;
Sánchez, A .
JOURNAL OF VETERINARY DIAGNOSTIC INVESTIGATION, 2001, 13 (02) :162-164
[3]   Molecular sexing of monomorphic endangered Ara birds [J].
Bermúdez-Humarán, LG ;
García-García, A ;
Leal-Garza, CH ;
Riojas-Valdes, VM ;
Jaramillo-Rangel, G ;
Montes-De-Oca-Luna, R .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL ZOOLOGY, 2002, 292 (07) :677-680
[4]   Sex determination in Greater Flamingo chicks through DNA analysis [J].
Bertault, G ;
Joulia, D ;
Johnson, AR ;
Raymond, M .
WATERBIRDS, 1999, 22 (02) :282-284
[5]   SEXING MONOMORPHIC BIRDS BY VENT MEASUREMENTS [J].
BOERSMA, PD ;
DAVIES, EM .
AUK, 1987, 104 (04) :779-783
[6]  
Boutette JB, 2002, J AVIAN MED SURG, V16, P198, DOI 10.1647/1082-6742(2002)016[0198:AIPCRR]2.0.CO
[7]  
2
[8]  
Coulter M, 1985, International Council For Bird Preservation Technical Publication, V3, P177
[9]   BREEDING, MORPHOLOGY, AND GROWTH OF THE ENDANGERED DARK-RUMPED PETREL [J].
CRUZ, F ;
CRUZ, JB .
AUK, 1990, 107 (02) :317-326
[10]   Conservation action in the Galapagos:: feral pig (Sus scrofa) eradication from Santiago Island [J].
Cruz, F ;
Donlan, CJ ;
Campbell, K ;
Carrion, V .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2005, 121 (03) :473-478