Empirical calibration of time series monitoring methods using receiver operating characteristic curves

被引:10
作者
Cohen, Jacqueline [1 ]
Garman, Samuel [1 ]
Gorr, Wilpen [1 ]
机构
[1] Carnegie Mellon Univ, H John Heinz III Coll, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
关键词
Time series monitoring; ROC curve; Average run length statistic; Exponential smoothing; Structural breaks; Step jumps; Outliers; FORECASTING SYSTEM; ACCURACY; SCHEMES; CRIME;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijforecast.2008.11.007
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Time series monitoring methods, such as the Brown and Trigg methods, have the purpose of detecting pattern breaks (or "signals") in time series data reliably and in a timely fashion. Traditionally, researchers have used the average run length (ARL) statistic on results from generated signal occurrences in simulated time series data to calibrate and evaluate these methods, with a focus on timeliness of signal detection. This paper investigates the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) framework, wellknown in the diagnostic decision making literature, as an alternative to ARL analysis for time series monitoring methods. ROC analysis traditionally uses real data to address the inherent tradeoff in signal detection between the true and false positive rates when varying control limits. We illustrate ROC analysis using time series data on crime at the patrol district level in two cities, and use the concept of Pareto frontier ROC curves and reverse functions for methods such as Brown's and Trigg's that have parameters affecting signal-detection performance. We compare the Brown and Trigg methods to three benchmark methods, including one commonly used in practice. The Brown and Trigg methods collapse to the same simple method on the Pareto frontier and dominate the benchmark methods under most conditions. The worst method is the one commonly used in practice. (C) 2008 International Institute of Forecasters. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:484 / 497
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Using a constrained formulation based on probability summation to fit receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves [J].
Swensson, RG ;
King, JL ;
Good, WF ;
Gur, D .
MEDICAL IMAGING 2000: IMAGE PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 2000, 3981 :145-153
[22]   Using confidence intervals to compare several correlated areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves [J].
Zou, G. Y. ;
Yue, Li .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2013, 32 (29) :5077-5090
[23]   Lognormal Lorenz and normal receiver operating characteristic curves as mirror images [J].
Irwin, R. John ;
Hautus, Michael J. .
ROYAL SOCIETY OPEN SCIENCE, 2015, 2 (02)
[24]   Receiver operating characteristic curves and confidence bands for support vector machines [J].
Luckett, Daniel J. ;
Laber, Eric B. ;
El-Kamary, Samer S. ;
Fan, Cheng ;
Jhaveri, Ravi ;
Perou, Charles M. ;
Shebl, Fatma M. ;
Kosorok, Michael R. .
BIOMETRICS, 2021, 77 (04) :1422-1430
[25]   Analysis of biomarker data: logs, odds ratios, and receiver operating characteristic curves [J].
Grund, Birgit ;
Sabin, Caroline .
CURRENT OPINION IN HIV AND AIDS, 2010, 5 (06) :473-479
[26]   Receiver operating characteristic curves in the crime linkage context: Benefits, limitations, and recommendations [J].
Ewanation, Logan ;
Bennell, Craig ;
Tonkin, Matthew ;
Santtila, Pekka .
APPLIED COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2023, 37 (06) :1277-1289
[27]   Minimum-Norm Estimation for Binormal Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Curves [J].
Davidov, Ori ;
Nov, Yuval .
BIOMETRICAL JOURNAL, 2009, 51 (06) :1030-1046
[28]   A regression modelling framework for receiver operating characteristic curves in medical diagnostic testing [J].
Pepe, MS .
BIOMETRIKA, 1997, 84 (03) :595-608
[29]   Statistical Inference for Box-Cox based Receiver Operating Characteristic Curves [J].
Bantis, Leonidas E. ;
Brewer, Benjamin ;
Nakas, Christos T. ;
Reiser, Benjamin .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2024, 43 (30) :6099-6122
[30]   Familiarity, recollection, and receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves in recognition memory [J].
Juola, James F. ;
Caballero-Sanz, Alexandra ;
Munoz-Garcia, Adrian R. ;
Botella, Juan ;
Suero, Manuel .
MEMORY & COGNITION, 2019, 47 (04) :855-876