Empirical calibration of time series monitoring methods using receiver operating characteristic curves

被引:10
|
作者
Cohen, Jacqueline [1 ]
Garman, Samuel [1 ]
Gorr, Wilpen [1 ]
机构
[1] Carnegie Mellon Univ, H John Heinz III Coll, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
关键词
Time series monitoring; ROC curve; Average run length statistic; Exponential smoothing; Structural breaks; Step jumps; Outliers; FORECASTING SYSTEM; ACCURACY; SCHEMES; CRIME;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijforecast.2008.11.007
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Time series monitoring methods, such as the Brown and Trigg methods, have the purpose of detecting pattern breaks (or "signals") in time series data reliably and in a timely fashion. Traditionally, researchers have used the average run length (ARL) statistic on results from generated signal occurrences in simulated time series data to calibrate and evaluate these methods, with a focus on timeliness of signal detection. This paper investigates the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) framework, wellknown in the diagnostic decision making literature, as an alternative to ARL analysis for time series monitoring methods. ROC analysis traditionally uses real data to address the inherent tradeoff in signal detection between the true and false positive rates when varying control limits. We illustrate ROC analysis using time series data on crime at the patrol district level in two cities, and use the concept of Pareto frontier ROC curves and reverse functions for methods such as Brown's and Trigg's that have parameters affecting signal-detection performance. We compare the Brown and Trigg methods to three benchmark methods, including one commonly used in practice. The Brown and Trigg methods collapse to the same simple method on the Pareto frontier and dominate the benchmark methods under most conditions. The worst method is the one commonly used in practice. (C) 2008 International Institute of Forecasters. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:484 / 497
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Diagnostic methods 2: receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves
    Tripepi, Giovanni
    Jager, Kitty J.
    Dekker, Friedo W.
    Zoccali, Carmine
    KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 2009, 76 (03) : 252 - 256
  • [2] Modelling receiver operating characteristic curves using Gaussian mixtures
    Cheam, Amay S. M.
    McNicholas, Paul D.
    COMPUTATIONAL STATISTICS & DATA ANALYSIS, 2016, 93 : 192 - 208
  • [3] Bifractal receiver operating characteristic curves: a formula for generating receiver operating characteristic curves in credit-scoring contexts
    Kochanski, Blazej
    JOURNAL OF RISK MODEL VALIDATION, 2021, 15 (01): : 1 - 18
  • [4] Risk assessment and receiver operating characteristic curves
    Szmukler, G.
    Everitt, B.
    Leese, M.
    PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 2012, 42 (05) : 895 - 898
  • [5] Estimation and comparison of receiver operating characteristic curves
    Pepe, Margaret S.
    Longton, Gary
    Janes, Holly
    STATA JOURNAL, 2009, 9 (01) : 1 - 16
  • [7] Using logistic regression procedures for estimating receiver operating characteristic curves
    Qin, J
    Zhang, B
    BIOMETRIKA, 2003, 90 (03) : 585 - 596
  • [8] Statistics review 13: Receiver operating characteristic curves
    Bewick, V
    Cheek, L
    Ball, J
    CRITICAL CARE, 2004, 8 (06): : 508 - 512
  • [9] Nonparametric covariate adjustment for receiver operating characteristic curves
    Yao, Fang
    Craiu, Radu V.
    Reiser, Benjamin
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF STATISTICS-REVUE CANADIENNE DE STATISTIQUE, 2010, 38 (01): : 27 - 46
  • [10] Assessing cure status prediction from survival data using receiver operating characteristic curves
    Amico, M.
    Van Keilegom, I
    Han, B.
    BIOMETRIKA, 2021, 108 (03) : 727 - 740