PET/CT with 11C-choline and 18F-FDG in patients with elevated PSA after radical treatment of a prostate cancer

被引:0
作者
Garcia, J. R. [1 ]
Soler, M. [1 ]
Blanch, M. A. [1 ]
Ramirez, I.
Riera, E. [1 ]
Lozano, P. [1 ]
Perez, X.
Delgado, E. [1 ]
Carrio, I. [1 ]
Lomena, F. [1 ]
机构
[1] CETIR, Unitat PET, Barcelona, Spain
来源
REVISTA ESPANOLA DE MEDICINA NUCLEAR | 2009年 / 28卷 / 03期
关键词
F-18-FDG PET/CT; C-11-choline PET/CT; POSITRON-EMISSION-TOMOGRAPHY; BIOCHEMICAL RECURRENCE; LOCAL RECURRENCE; SALVAGE RADIOTHERAPY; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; RADIATION-THERAPY; FDG PET; DISEASE; CARCINOMA; ANTIGEN;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objective: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of PET/CT with F-18-FDG and C-11-choline for early detection and localization of recurrent prostate cancer. Material and methods: Thirty-eight patients with increased PSA levels (0.8-9.5 ng/ml) after radical treatment for prostate cancer (surgery n = 20/radiation therapy n = 18) were included. Ten patients were on hormone therapy. All patients underwent a PET/CT with C-11-choline and F-18-FDG, respectively, on the same day. The PET imaging findings were compared with histopathology (n = 10); PSA monitoring (n = 21) and/or other methods (n = 7). Results: Focal uptake of C-11-choline was detected in 26 patients (68%), and focal uptake of F-18-FDG was detected in 13 patients (34%). The C-11-choline uptake in 14 patients was suggested local recurrence, whereas this was true in only 4 patients (48%) with F-18-FDG. Pelvic lymph nodes were detected with C-11-choline PET/CT in 8 patients and only in 4 patients (50%) with F-18-FDG. Mediastinal involvement was detected in 5 patients with C-11-choline and 3 patients (60%) with F-18-FDG. Focal bone involvement was detected in 3 patients with C-11-choline and F-18-FDG, C-11-choline was able to detect 40% of recurrences in patients with PSA < 1 ng/ml, 50% of recurrences in patients with PSA 1-4 ng/ml and 87% of recurrences with PSA > 4 ng/ml. Sensitivity of C-11-choline was higher for surgically treated patients, with no significant differences found between patients with and without hormone therapy. Conclusions: C-11-choline PET/CT was useful for the detection of biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer, with higher yielding as compared to F-18-FDG. C-11-choline sensitivity was clearly related to PSA levels, was higher in patients with surgery and did not seem to be modified by hormonal therapy. Disease staging with C-11-choline showed direct impact for the selection of the most appropriate therapeutic approach. (C) 2008 Elsevier Espana, S.L. and SEMN. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:95 / 100
页数:6
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [1] Ackerstaff E, 2001, CANCER RES, V61, P3599
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1997, INT RAD ONCOL BIOL P, V37, P1035
  • [3] Salvage radiotherapy for recurrent prostate cancer - The earlier the better
    Anscher, MS
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2004, 291 (11): : 1380 - 1382
  • [4] Management of recurrent disease after radical prostatectomy
    Bott, SRJ
    [J]. PROSTATE CANCER AND PROSTATIC DISEASES, 2004, 7 (03) : 211 - 216
  • [5] A comparison of the single and double factor high-risk models for risk assignment of prostate cancer treated with 3D conformal radiotherapy
    Chism, DB
    Hanlon, AL
    Horwitz, EM
    Feigenberg, SJ
    Pollack, A
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2004, 59 (02): : 380 - 385
  • [6] Endorectal MR imaging MR spectroscopic imaging for locally recurrent prostate cancer after external beam radiation therapy: Preliminary experience
    Coakley, FV
    Teh, HS
    Qayyum, A
    Swanson, MG
    Lu, Y
    Roach, M
    Pickett, B
    Shinohara, K
    Vigneron, DB
    Kurhanewicz, J
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2004, 233 (02) : 441 - 448
  • [7] Coleman, 2000, Clin Positron Imaging, V3, P147, DOI 10.1016/S1095-0397(00)00059-5
  • [8] Local recurrence after radical prostatectomy: Characteristics in size, location, and relationship to prostate-specific antigen and surgical margins
    Connolly, JA
    Shinohara, K
    Presti, JC
    Carroll, PR
    [J]. UROLOGY, 1996, 47 (02) : 225 - 231
  • [9] Cox JD, 1999, J CLIN ONCOL, V17, P1155
  • [10] de Jong IJ, 2003, J NUCL MED, V44, P331