The effect of cognitive load on nonverbal behavior in the cognitive interview for suspects

被引:12
作者
Frosina, P. [1 ]
Logue, M. [1 ]
Book, A. [1 ]
Huizinga, T. [1 ]
Amos, S. [1 ]
Stark, S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Brock Univ, St Catharines, ON, Canada
关键词
Interrogation; Nonverbal cues; Cognitive interview; Cognitive load; Psychopathy; INTERPERSONAL-BEHAVIOR; SELF-REPORT; DECEPTION; PSYCHOPATHY; LIES; CUES; SITUATION; OFFENDERS; BELIEFS; LIARS;
D O I
10.1016/j.paid.2018.03.012
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
We investigated whether cognitive load results in changes to nonverbal behavior in the context of interrogation, and whether psychopathic traits affected this relationship. Cognitive load was implemented by using the cognitive interview for suspects (CIS). Onehundred- and-fifty undergraduate students were assigned to one of two conditions: 1) a true event, where they played a game with a confederate, and money went missing from a wallet in the room, or 2) a false-alibi condition, where they read a scenario similar to the true event (in order to create a feasible alibi), and were instructed to steal $10 from the wallet. Blinking, hand gestures, trunk movements, and direct eye gaze were coded at each point in the CIS. Regardless of condition, the increase in cognitive load had the effect of increasing blinking and decreasing hand gestures and direct eye gaze. There were significant interactions between CIS stage and experimental condition for blinks and hand gestures, where people in the false alibi condition had a sharper increase in blinking, and decrease in hand gestures when cognitive load was introduced. Psychopathic traits did not affect the utility of above cues, but change in trunk movements was positively correlated with psychopathy in the false alibi condition.
引用
收藏
页码:51 / 58
页数:8
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
Akehurst L, 1996, APPL COGNITIVE PSYCH, V10, P461, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0720(199612)10:6<461::AID-ACP413>3.0.CO
[2]  
2-2
[3]  
[Anonymous], MALINGERING ILLNESS
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2009, The philosophy of deception, DOI [10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195327939.003.0008, DOI 10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780195327939.003.0008]
[5]  
Billings F., 2004, THESIS
[6]   Psychopathic traits and experimentally induced deception in self-report assessment [J].
Book, Angela S. ;
Holden, Ronald R. ;
Starzyk, Katherine B. ;
Wasylkiw, Louise ;
Edwards, Melanie J. .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2006, 41 (04) :601-608
[7]  
BULL R, 1989, NATO ADV SCI I D-BEH, V47, P83
[8]  
Buller DB, 1996, COMMUN THEOR, V6, P203, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-2885.1996.tb00127.x
[9]  
DEPAULO BM, 1989, NATO ADV SCI I D-BEH, V47, P51
[10]   Cues to deception [J].
DePaulo, BM ;
Lindsay, JJ ;
Malone, BE ;
Muhlenbruck, L ;
Charlton, K ;
Cooper, H .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 2003, 129 (01) :74-118