The relationship between lexical use and L2 writing quality: A case of two genres

被引:7
作者
Zhang, Xiaopeng [1 ]
机构
[1] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Foreign Studies, English Dept, 28 Xianning West Rd, Xian 710049, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
关键词
Chinese English as a Foreign Language learners; genre; lexical use; predictability; rated quality of L2 essays; regression modeling; PROFICIENCY; SOPHISTICATION; ACQUISITION; FEATURES; VOCABULARY; JUDGMENTS; DIVERSITY; NEIGHBORS; COHESION; STUDENTS;
D O I
10.1111/ijal.12420
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Extensive research has been done to explore how lexical use could predict the rated quality of L2 writing. However, the degree to which the rated quality is influenced by lexical use in different genres of L2 essays is relatively unexplored. This study tested the effect of lexical use on the rated quality of L2 argumentative and expository essays. Three natural language processing tools (i.e., the Lexical Complexity Analyzer, D_Tools, and TAALES) were employed to obtain the index of lexical density, diversity, and sophistication. Results suggested that the rated quality of both genres of L2 essays was not significantly predicted by lexical density and lexical diversity but was predicted by different indices of lexical sophistication. The striking difference in the prediction of lexical sophistication on the writing quality for both genres bears on academic word use. The observed pattern on lexical use in L2 writing across the two genres attested to the assumption that genre embodies socially constructed linguistic practices whereby L2 learners use various linguistic forms to achieve communicative goals.
引用
收藏
页码:371 / 396
页数:26
相关论文
共 56 条
  • [1] Phonographic neighbors, not orthographic neighbors, determine word naming latencies
    Adelman, James S.
    Brown, Gordon D. A.
    [J]. PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2007, 14 (03) : 455 - 459
  • [2] The English Lexicon Project
    Balota, David A.
    Yap, Melvin J.
    Cortese, Michael J.
    Hutchison, Keith A.
    Kessler, Brett
    Loftis, Bjorn
    Neely, James H.
    Nelson, Douglas L.
    Simpson, Greg B.
    Treiman, Rebecca
    [J]. BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 2007, 39 (03) : 445 - 459
  • [3] Biber D., 2006, University language
  • [4] Bulte B., 2012, Dimensions of L2 performance and proficiency: Complexity, accuracy and fluency in SLA, P21, DOI [10.1075/lllt.32.02bul, DOI 10.1075/LLLT.32.02BUL]
  • [5] Carroll D.W., 2000, Psychology of Language
  • [6] Cutting the Gordian Knot: The Moving-Average Type-Token Ratio (MATTR)
    Covington, Michael A.
    McFall, Joe D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF QUANTITATIVE LINGUISTICS, 2010, 17 (02) : 94 - 100
  • [7] A new academic word list
    Coxhead, A
    [J]. TESOL QUARTERLY, 2000, 34 (02) : 213 - 238
  • [8] Assessing Lexical Proficiency Using Analytic Ratings: A Case for Collocation Accuracy
    Crossley, Scott A.
    Salsbury, Tom
    McNamara, Danielle S.
    [J]. APPLIED LINGUISTICS, 2015, 36 (05) : 570 - 590
  • [9] Predicting second language writing proficiency: the roles of cohesion and linguistic sophistication
    Crossley, Scott A.
    McNamara, Danielle S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN READING, 2012, 35 (02) : 115 - 135
  • [10] CROWHURST M, 1987, RES TEACH ENGL, V21, P185