Simulation of EAST quasi-snowflake discharge by tokamak simulation code

被引：7

作者：

Guo, Y. ^{[1
]}

Pironti, A. ^{[2
,3
]}

Liu, L. ^{[1
]}

Xiao, B. J. ^{[1
,4
]}

Albanese, R. ^{[2
,3
]}

Ambrosino, R. ^{[2
,3
]}

Luo, Z. P. ^{[1
]}

Yuan, Q. P. ^{[1
]}

Calabro, G. ^{[5
]}

Crisanti, F. ^{[5
]}

Xing, Z. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Plasma Phys, Hefei 230031, Peoples R China

[2] Univ Cassino, Univ Naples Federico II, CREATE, I-80125 Naples, Italy

[3] Univ Napoli Parthenope, I-80125 Naples, Italy

[4] Univ Sci & Technol China, Sch Nucl Sci & Technol, Hefei 230026, Peoples R China

[5] CR Frascati, ENEA UnitaTecn Fus, I-00044 Rome, Italy

来源：

FUSION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN | 2015年 / 101卷

基金：

中国国家自然科学基金;

关键词：

Quasi-Snowflake; Singular value decomposition method; EAST; Tokamak discharge simulation; RECONSTRUCTION;

D O I：

10.1016/j.fusengdes.2015.10.010

中图分类号：

TL [原子能技术]; O571 [原子核物理学];

学科分类号：

0827 ; 082701 ;

摘要：

Both theory and experiment have proved Snowflake configuration could reduce the heat loads on divertor plate. Due to limitation of PF coils, EAST could only operate with quasi-snowflake (QSF). In 2014 EAST campaign, QSF has been achieved by RZIp control. The next important task is the QSF shape control. As tokamak discharge simulation code, Tokamak Simulation Code (TSC), which has been benchmarked by experimental data, is used to simulate EAST QSF discharge. Singular Value Decomposition (SVD) method, a way to decouple the PP current and control parameter, is implemented in TSC code to simulate the course of QSF shape control. The simulation results show SVD method is a good way for EAST QSF shape control. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

引用

页码：101 / 110

页数：10

共 50 条

[1] The simulation of the application of quasi-snowflake magnetic configuration on the EAST new lower tungsten divertor
Zhang, Chen
Sang, Chaofeng
Wang, Liang
Luo, Zhengping
Xu, Guosheng
Liu, Daoyuan
Wang, Dezhen
FUSION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 2020, 158
[2] Experimental advanced superconducting tokamak ohmic discharge simulation by the tokamak simulation code
Guo, Yong
Xiao, Bingjia
Wu, Bin
Liu, Chengyue
PLASMA PHYSICS AND CONTROLLED FUSION, 2012, 54 (08)
[3] Simulation of EAST vertical displacement events by tokamak simulation code
Qiu, Qinglai
Xiao, Bingjia
Guo, Yong
Liu, Lei
Xing, Zhe
Humphreys, D. A.
NUCLEAR FUSION, 2016, 56 (10)
[4] Development of the simulation platform between EAST plasma control system and the tokamak simulation code based on Simulink
王森
袁旗平
肖炳甲
Plasma Science and Technology, 2017, 19 (03) : 102 - 111
[5] Hybrid simulation of fishbone instabilities in the EAST tokamak
Shen, Wei
Wang, Feng
Fu, G. Y.
Xu, Liqing
Li, Guoqiang
Liu, Chengyue
NUCLEAR FUSION, 2017, 57 (11)
[6] Development of the simulation platform between EAST plasma control system and the tokamak simulation code based on Simulink
Wang, Sen
Yuan, Qiping
Xiao, Bingjia
PLASMA SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 19 (03)
[7] Simulation suite for plasma magnetic control at EAST tokamak
Castaldo, A.
Mele, A.
Albanese, R.
Ambrosino, R.
De Tommasi, G.
Luo, Z. P.
Pironti, A.
Xiao, B. J.
Yuan, Q. P.
FUSION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 2018, 133 : 19 - 31
[8] Experiment and simulation of ELM in NBI heated plasma on EAST tokamak
Geng, K. N.
Tang, T. F.
Kong, D. F.
Zhang, S. B.
Zhang, T.
Huang, C. B.
Wu, M. Q.
Jiang, D.
Lyu, B.
Wang, L.
Gao, W.
Liu, Z. X.
Liu, A. D.
Duan, Y. M.
Zhang, L.
Jie, Y. X.
Zang, Q.
Zhu, X.
Hao, B. L.
Wang, K.
Lin, X. D.
Huang, J. J.
Wan, Y. X.
Gao, X.
NUCLEAR FUSION, 2021, 61 (05)
[9] Experimental observation and simulation analysis of the relationship between the fishbone and ITB formation on EAST tokamak
Liu, Z. X.
Ge, W. L.
Wang, F.
Liu, Y. J.
Yang, Y.
Wu, M. Q.
Wang, Z. X.
Zhang, X. X.
Li, H.
Xie, J. L.
Lan, T.
Mao, Wenzhe
Liu, A. D.
Zhou, C.
Ding, W. X.
Zhuang, G.
Liu, W. D.
NUCLEAR FUSION, 2020, 60 (12)
[10] Modelling of First Discharge in EAST Tokamak
刘成岳
吴斌
肖炳甲
舒双宝
Plasma Science and Technology, 2008, (01) : 8 - 12

← 1 2 3 4 5 →