Assessing risk: the role of probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) in patient safety improvement

被引:48
|
作者
Wreathall, J
Nemeth, C
机构
[1] John Wreathall & Co Inc, Dublin, OH 43016 USA
[2] Univ Chicago, Cognit Technol Lab, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
来源
QUALITY & SAFETY IN HEALTH CARE | 2004年 / 13卷 / 03期
关键词
D O I
10.1136/qshc.2003.006056
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Morbidity and mortality due to "medical errors" compel better understanding of health care as a system. Probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) has been used to assess the designs of high hazard, low risk systems such as commercial nuclear power plants and chemical manufacturing plants and is now being studied for its potential in the improvement of patient safety. PRA examines events that contribute to adverse outcomes through the use of event tree analysis and determines the likelihood of event occurrence through fault tree analysis. It complements tools already in use in patient safety such as failure modes and effects analyses (FMEAs) and root cause analyses (RCAs). PRA improves on RCA by taking account of the more complex causal interrelationships that are typical in health care. It also enables the analyst to examine potential solution effectiveness by direct graphical representations. However, PRA simplifies real world complexity by forcing binary conditions on events, and it lacks adequate probability data (although recent developments help to overcome these limitations). Its reliance on expert assessment calls for deep domain knowledge which has to come from research performed at the "sharp end" of acute care.
引用
收藏
页码:206 / 212
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Assessing risk and evaluating safety in extracorproreal membrane oxygenation (ECMO): The probabilistic risk assessment methodology (PRA)
    Short, BL
    Marx, D
    Muir, R
    Dalton, H
    Mikesell, G
    Hilliard, MA
    Slonim, A
    PEDIATRIC RESEARCH, 2004, 55 (04) : 520A - 520A
  • [2] CANDU FIRE PROBABILISTIC RISK ASSESSMENT (PRA) MODEL
    Shalabi, Hossam
    Hadjisophocleous, George
    CNL NUCLEAR REVIEW, 2019, 8 (02) : 97 - 108
  • [3] Modeling process risk contributions for the Space Shuttle Probabilistic Risk Assessment (PRA)
    Vesely, WE
    Boyer, RL
    PROBABILISTIC SAFETY ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT, VOL I AND II, PROCEEDINGS, 2002, : 941 - 947
  • [4] Toward a Probabilistic Risk Assessment (PRA) Method for Assessing Mishaps in Legacy Systems Using Mishap Reports
    Dean, Joseph
    O'Halloran, Bryan M.
    Van Bossuyt, Douglas L.
    Mourning, Rachel
    Dean, Joseph (joseph.dean1@usmc.mil), 1600, John Wiley and Sons Inc (30): : 1064 - 1078
  • [5] Probabilistic Risk Assessment (PRA) and redesign of the evaluation process of the organ donors
    Bellandi, Tommaso
    HEALTHCARE SYSTEMS ERGONOMICS AND PATIENT SAFETY 2011: AN ALLIANCE BETWEEN PROFESSIONALS AND CITIZENS FOR PATIENT SAFETY AND QUALITY OF LIFE, 2011, : 635 - 636
  • [6] Application of entry-time processes within probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) and generation risk assessment (GRA)
    Wang, Shuwen
    Nelson, Paul
    Kee, Ernie J.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME PRESSURE VESSELS AND PIPING CONFERENCE 2007, VOL 7: OPERATIONS, APPLICATIONS AND COMPONENTS, 2007, 7 : 115 - 123
  • [7] Assessing patient safety risk before the injury occurs: an introduction to sociotechnical probabilistic risk modelling in health care
    Marx, DA
    Slonim, AD
    QUALITY & SAFETY IN HEALTH CARE, 2003, 12 : II33 - II38
  • [8] Socio-technical probabilistic risk assessment: Its application to patient safety
    Hale, M
    Slonim, A
    Allen, B
    Marx, D
    Kirkland, J
    PROBABILISTIC SAFETY ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT, VOL 1- 6, 2004, : 2218 - 2223
  • [9] PROBABILISTIC RISK ASSESSMENT AND AVIATION SYSTEM SAFETY
    WOJCIK, LA
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE FIFTH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON AVIATION PSYCHOLOGY, VOLS 1 AND 2, 1989, : 402 - 407
  • [10] Reliability of safety systems and probabilistic risk assessment
    Martorell, Sebastian
    Marton, Isabel
    Villamizar, Maryory
    CISAP4: 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SAFETY & ENVIRONMENT IN PROCESS INDUSTRY, 2010, 19 : 321 - 326