Diabetes Prevention Programs in Rural North America: a Systematic Scoping Review

被引:3
作者
Rosputni, Christie [1 ]
Short, Eliza [2 ]
Rahim-Sepulveda, Martina [2 ]
Howe, Carol L. [3 ]
da Silva, Vanessa [2 ,4 ]
Alvarez, Karen [2 ]
Hingle, Melanie D. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Arizona, Dept Physiol, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
[2] Univ Arizona, Dept Nutr Sci, Coll Agr & Life Sci, 1177 E 4th St,Shantz Bldg Room 328, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
[3] Univ Arizona, Hlth Sci Lib, Tucson, AZ USA
[4] Univ Arizona, Arizona Cooperat Extens, Tucson, AZ USA
关键词
Diabetes prevention; Rural health; Remote communities; Community interventions; LIFE-STYLE INTERVENTION; WEIGHT-LOSS; FOLLOW-UP; MANAGEMENT; REDUCTION; CHILDREN; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1007/s11892-019-1160-3
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
AimsThe aims of this systematic scoping review were to characterize the extent to which diabetes prevention programs have focused on rural populations in North America and where possible, identify efficacious program components.MethodsThe review was guided by the PRISMA statement and five steps for scoping studies. Searches were conducted in August 2017 in Tucson, Arizona. Two teams of three independently screened full texts, excluding prior reviews, systematic reviews, and opinion pieces. Two authors abstracted data, which were reviewed by other team members.ResultsOf the 12,840 articles identified, 12 met all criteria. Nine studies were based in the USA and three were Canadian. Demographics reflected high enrollment of underrepresented minorities, adults, and females. Methodological rigor was low; most studies were single-arm interventions evaluated using pre-/post-measures. Weight was measured across all studies, although biological, behavioral, and psychosocial outcomes were inconsistently assessed. Eight studies reported significant changes in primary outcomes. Duration and intensity were variable; delivery was led by trained volunteers or health professionals. Seven studies reported recruitment, retention, and adherence data.ConclusionsSurprisingly, few rural diabetes prevention studies have been published. Published programs were notable for lack of youth and/or family involvement, integrated prevention and treatment programs, and heavy reliance on self-reported outcomes.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] Prevention or Delay of Type 2 Diabetes: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2018
    不详
    [J]. DIABETES CARE, 2018, 41 : S51 - S54
  • [2] [Anonymous], EXT
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2017, National Diabetes Statistics Report, P20
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2014, ADV PREVENTIVE MED, DOI DOI 10.1155/2014/798184
  • [5] [Anonymous], USDA EC INF B
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2018, DIAB PREV REC PROGR
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2011, DIAB CAN TIPP POINT
  • [8] [Anonymous], EVALUATION PRACTICE
  • [9] Weight loss and improved metabolic outcomes amongst rural African American women in the Deep South: six-month outcomes from a community-based randomized trial
    Ard, J. D.
    Carson, T. L.
    Shikany, J. M.
    Li, Y.
    Hardy, C. M.
    Robinson, J. C.
    Williams, A. G.
    Baskin, M. L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2017, 282 (01) : 102 - 113
  • [10] Arksey H., 2005, INT J SOC RES METHOD, V8, P19, DOI [10.1080/1364557032000119616, DOI 10.1080/1364557032000119616]