Analgesia after thoracotomy: Epidural fentanyl/bupivacaine compared with intercostal nerve block plus intravenous morphine

被引:38
作者
Concha, M
Dagnino, J
Cariaga, M
Aguilera, J
Aparicio, R
Guerrero, M
机构
[1] Pontificia Univ Catolica Chile, Dept Anesthesiol, Santiago, Chile
[2] Pontificia Univ Catolica Chile, Div Surg, Santiago, Chile
关键词
thoracotomy; epidural analgesia; intercostal block; analgesia; postoperative pain; pulmonary function;
D O I
10.1053/j.jvca.2004.03.013
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Objectives: Intercostal nerve blockade plus intravenous (IV) patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) could be an easier and safer alternative to epidural analgesia for postthoracotomy pain, but information about the efficacy of this technique is scarce. The objective of this randomized study was to compare the quality of analgesia and lung function in 2 groups of patients undergoing pulmonary surgery through a posterolateral thoracotomy. Methods: Two groups were studied: G1 (n = 16) patients received a 5-segment intercostal block plus IV PCA morphine, and G2 (n = 15) patients received a bupivacaine and fentanyl PCA infusion through a thoracic epidural catheter. Resting and dynamic visual analog pain scale (VAS) measurements, forced vital capacity, and forced expiratory volume in 1 second were measured basally, on arrival in the recovery room, then hourly up to 4 hours and then 12, 24 and 48 hours later. Results were analyzed with a 2-way analysis of variance, chi-square, or Fisher exact test. A p value less than or equal to0.05 was considered significant. Results: Resting and dynamic VAS scores were slightly lower in G2 patients, although only resting scores were significant. After the first hour, mean scores were below 4 in both groups. No significant difference was observed between groups in relation to respiratory parameters or side effects. Conclusion: The fact that the difference in pain scores is probably not clinically significant shows that an intercostal block with bupivacaine plus IV morphine PCA is a good alternative for postthoracotomy pain management. (C) 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:322 / 326
页数:5
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   The comparative effects of postoperative analgesic therapies on pulmonary outcome: Cumulative meta-analyses of randomized, controlled trials [J].
Ballantyne, JC ;
Carr, DB ;
deFerranti, S ;
Suarez, T ;
Lau, J ;
Chalmers, TC ;
Angelillo, IF ;
Mosteller, F .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1998, 86 (03) :598-612
[2]   Tramadol infusion for postthoracotomy pain relief: A placebo-controlled comparison with epidural morphine [J].
Bloch, MB ;
Dyer, RA ;
Heijke, SA ;
James, MF .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2002, 94 (03) :523-528
[3]   Improvement of 'dynamic analgesia' does not decrease atelectasis after thoracotomy [J].
Boisseau, N ;
Rabary, O ;
Padovani, B ;
Staccini, P ;
Mouroux, J ;
Grimaud, D ;
Raucoules-Aimé, M .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2001, 87 (04) :564-569
[4]   CONTINUOUS THORACIC EPIDURAL FENTANYL FOR POSTTHORACOTOMY PAIN RELIEF - WITH OR WITHOUT BUPIVACAINE [J].
GEORGE, KA ;
WRIGHT, PMC ;
CHISAKUTA, A .
ANAESTHESIA, 1991, 46 (09) :732-736
[5]   Incidence of neurologic complications related to thoracic epidural catheterization [J].
Giebler, RM ;
Scherer, RU ;
Peters, J .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1997, 86 (01) :55-63
[6]   A RANDOMIZED COMPARISON OF INTRAVENOUS VERSUS LUMBAR AND THORACIC EPIDURAL FENTANYL FOR ANALGESIA AFTER THORACOTOMY [J].
GUINARD, JP ;
MAVROCORDATOS, P ;
CHIOLERO, R ;
CARPENTER, RL .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1992, 77 (06) :1108-1115
[7]   PAIN CONTROL AFTER THORACIC-SURGERY - A REVIEW OF CURRENT TECHNIQUES [J].
KAVANAGH, BP ;
KATZ, J ;
SANDLER, AN .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1994, 81 (03) :737-759
[8]   Effect of postoperative analgesia on surgical outcome [J].
Kehlet, H ;
Holte, K .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2001, 87 (01) :62-72
[9]  
LOPER KA, 1990, ANESTH ANALG, V70, P72
[10]   Thoracic epidural infusions for post-thoracotomy pain: a comparison of fentanyl-bupivacaine mixtures vs. fentanyl alone [J].
Mahon, SV ;
Berry, PD ;
Jackson, M ;
Russell, GN ;
Pennefather, SH .
ANAESTHESIA, 1999, 54 (07) :641-646