California's energy and climate policy: A full plate, but perhaps not a model policy

被引:13
|
作者
Wara, Michael [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Law Sch, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Steyer Taylor Ctr Energy Policy & Finance, Stanford, CA USA
[3] Stanfords Freeman Spogli Inst Int Studies, Program Energy & Sustainable Dev, Stanford, CA USA
[4] Stanford Law, Stanford, CA USA
[5] Holland & Knights Govt Practice Grp, Tampa, FL USA
关键词
California; cap-and-trade; climate policy; energy efficiency; greenhouse gas emissions; Low Carbon Fuel Standard; Renewable Portfolio Standard; tailpipe standards;
D O I
10.1177/0096340214546832
中图分类号
D81 [国际关系];
学科分类号
030207 ;
摘要
California is a leader among states in its efforts to cut greenhouse gas emissions. Under the California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 (Assembly Bill 32), the state has set itself on a course to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions to 1990 levels by the year 2020. In addition to its cap-and-trade program, California aims to accomplish this objective via a large assortment of complementary and overlapping policies. To a significant degree, cap-and-trade is a market-based "dessert" that follows a multicourse menu of other regulatory initiatives aimed at cutting emissions. The reduced cost-effectiveness, political costs, and regulatory costs associated with this approach make it unlikely to form a suitable model for states in which political commitment to climate action is more limited or regulatory capacity is not as great as in California.
引用
收藏
页码:26 / 34
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条