Use of Palpation Imaging in Diagnosis of Breast Diseases: A Way to Improve the Detection Rate

被引:2
作者
Ding, Yihan [1 ,2 ]
Sun, Chenyu [3 ]
Zhou, Qin [4 ]
Cheng, Ce [5 ]
Yan, Cunye [6 ]
Wang, Benzhong [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Anhui Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Breast Surg, Hefei, Anhui, Peoples R China
[2] Anhui Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Gen Surg, Hefei, Anhui, Peoples R China
[3] AMITA Hlth St Joseph Hosp Chicago, Chicago, IL USA
[4] Mayo Clin, Dept Radiat Oncol, Rochester, MN USA
[5] Univ Arizona, Coll Med, Dept Internal Med, South Campus, Tucson, AZ USA
[6] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Chongqing Gen Hosp, Dept Breast & Thyroid Surg, Chongqing, Peoples R China
来源
MEDICAL SCIENCE MONITOR | 2020年 / 26卷
关键词
Breast Neoplasms; Mammography; Palpation; Ultrasonography; CANCER; MAMMOGRAPHY; PERFORMANCE; ULTRASOUND; WOMEN; RISK;
D O I
10.12659/MSM.927553
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background: Breast diseases pose increasing threat to women health as peoples lifestyle changes. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical application value of Palpation Imaging (PI) in the diagnosis of breast diseases. Material/Methods: From October 2019 to February 2020, 184 patients with 225 breast lesions were examined by using PI, ultrasound, and mammography in the department of Breast Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University. All cases were confirmed pathologically by core-needle biopsy or excisional biopsy. The cut-off value of the PI tests was determined by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. We compared the examination results of PI with ultrasound and mammography to analyze the diagnostic value of PI. Results: Pathological examination revealed that 186/225(82.67%) lesions were benign, while 39 were malignant. All 8 parameters of PI were significantly correlated with pathological findings (P<0.05). The best cut-off value for the PI score was 19.5 and the area under the curve (AUC) for the PI was 0.921 (95% CI: 0.874-0.968, P<0.001) with 89.7% sensitivity and 86.0% specificity. PI showed greater sensitivity (89.7%) and its specificity (86.0% vs. 86.4%, P=0.931) and accuracy (86.7% vs. 84.6%, P=0.604) were similar to those of mammography. The combination of 3 types of test is superior to a single examination. The sensitivity was 100% and the specificity was 98.8%. Conclusions: PI has high clinical value in differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions. Combination examination has the potential to improve the detection of breast cancer in screening and diagnostic capacities and can be used as a supplement to ultrasound and mammography.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Imaging and cancer: Research strategy of the American College of Radiology Imaging Network [J].
Aberle, DR ;
Chiles, C ;
Gatsonis, C ;
Hillman, BJ ;
Johnson, CD ;
McClennan, BL ;
Mitchell, DG ;
Pisano, ED ;
Schnall, MD ;
Sorensen, AG .
RADIOLOGY, 2005, 235 (03) :741-751
[2]  
An Y. Y, 2012, BREAST CANC, V21, P302
[3]   Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis, Version 3.2018 [J].
Bevers, Therese B. ;
Helvie, Mark ;
Bonaccio, Ermelinda ;
Calhoun, Kristine E. ;
Daly, Mary B. ;
Farrar, William B. ;
Garber, Judy E. ;
Gray, Richard ;
Greenberg, Caprice C. ;
Greenup, Rachel ;
Hansen, Nora M. ;
Harris, Randall E. ;
Heerdt, Alexandra S. ;
Helsten, Teresa ;
Hodgkiss, Linda ;
Hoyt, Tamarya L. ;
Huff, John G. ;
Jacobs, Lisa ;
Lehman, Constance Dobbins ;
Monsees, Barbara ;
Niell, Bethany L. ;
Parker, Catherine C. ;
Pearlman, Mark ;
Philpotts, Liane ;
Shepardson, Laura B. ;
Smith, Mary Lou ;
Stein, Matthew ;
Tumyan, Lusine ;
Williams, Cheryl ;
Bergman, Mary Anne ;
Kumar, Rashmi .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL COMPREHENSIVE CANCER NETWORK, 2018, 16 (11) :1362-1389
[4]   DNA methylation and breast tumor clinicopathological features: The Western New York Exposures and Breast Cancer (WEB) study [J].
Callahan, Catherine L. ;
Wang, Youjin ;
Marian, Catalin ;
Weng, Daniel Y. ;
Eng, Kevin H. ;
Tao, Meng-Hua ;
Ambrosone, Christine B. ;
Nie, Jing ;
Trevisan, Maurizio ;
Smiraglia, Dominic ;
Edge, Stephen B. ;
Shields, Peter G. ;
Freudenheim, Jo L. .
EPIGENETICS, 2016, 11 (09) :643-652
[5]   The Relationship of Mammographic Density and Age: Implications for Breast Cancer Screening [J].
Checka, Cristina M. ;
Chun, Jennifer E. ;
Schnabel, Freya R. ;
Lee, Jiyon ;
Toth, Hildegard .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2012, 198 (03) :W292-W295
[6]  
de Wolf CJM, 2001, BRIT MED J, V322, P792
[7]   Reduction in breast cancer mortality from organized service screening with mammography:: 1.: Further confirmation with extended data [J].
Duffy, SW ;
Tabár, L ;
Chen, THH ;
Smith, RA ;
Holmberg, L ;
Jonsson, H ;
Lenner, P ;
Nyström, L ;
Törnberg, S .
CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2006, 15 (01) :45-51
[8]   Differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions by mechanical imaging [J].
Egorov, Vladimir ;
Kearney, Thomas ;
Pollak, Stanley B. ;
Rohatgi, Chand ;
Sarvazyan, Noune ;
Airapetian, Suren ;
Browning, Stephanie ;
Sarvazyan, Armen .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2009, 118 (01) :67-80
[9]   Breast Cancer Survivorship: Where Are We Today? [J].
Ganz, Patricia A. ;
Goodwin, Pamela J. .
IMPROVING OUTCOMES FOR BREAST CANCER SURVIVORS: PERSPECTIVES ON RESEARCH CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES, 2015, 862 :1-8
[10]   Incorporating Breast Anatomy in Computational Phenotyping of Mammographic Parenchymal Patterns for Breast Cancer Risk Estimation [J].
Gastounioti, Aimilia ;
Hsieh, Meng-Kang ;
Cohen, Eric ;
Pantalone, Lauren ;
Conant, Emily F. ;
Kontos, Despina .
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2018, 8