Strategy-proof contract auctions and the role of ties

被引:1
|
作者
de Weerdt, Mathijs M. [1 ]
Harrenstein, Paul [2 ]
Conitzer, Vincent [3 ]
机构
[1] Delft Univ Technol, Delft, Netherlands
[2] Univ Oxford, Oxford, England
[3] Duke Univ, Durham, NC 27706 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Contract auction; Indifferences; Social choice function; Strategy-proofness; Tie-breaking; Weakly transferable utility; EFFICIENCY;
D O I
10.1016/j.geb.2013.09.001
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
A contract auction establishes a contract between a center and one of the bidders. As contracts may describe many terms, preferences over contracts typically display indifferences. The Qualitative Vickrey Auction (QVA) selects the best contract for the winner that is at least as good for the center as any of the contracts offered by the non-winning players. When each bidder can always offer a contract with higher utility for the center at an arbitrarily small loss of her own utility, the QVA is the only mechanism that is individually rational, strategy-proof, selects stable outcomes, and is Pareto efficient. For general continuous utility functions, a variant of the QVA involving fixed tie-breaking is strategy-proof and also selects stable outcomes. However, there is no mechanism in this setting that in addition also selects Pareto efficient outcomes. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:405 / 420
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条