Status of meat alternatives and their potential role in the future meat market - A review

被引:181
作者
Lee, Hyun Jung [1 ,2 ]
Yong, Hae In [3 ]
Kim, Minsu [1 ,2 ]
Choi, Yun-Sang [3 ]
Jo, Cheorun [1 ,2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ, Ctr Food & Bioconvergence, Dept Agr Biotechnol, Seoul 08826, South Korea
[2] Seoul Natl Univ, Res Inst Agr & Life Sci, Seoul 08826, South Korea
[3] Korea Food Res Inst, Res Grp Food Proc, Wonju 55365, South Korea
[4] Seoul Natl Univ, Inst Green Bio Sci & Technol, Pyeongchang 25354, South Korea
来源
ASIAN-AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCES | 2020年 / 33卷 / 10期
基金
芬兰科学院;
关键词
Meat Alternatives; Plant-based Meat Analogues; Edible Insects; Cultured Meat; Protein Sources; EDIBLE INSECTS; CULTURED MEAT; NUTRITIONAL COMPOSITION; CONSUMER ACCEPTANCE; REGULATORY CHALLENGES; CONSUMPTION CULTURE; STEM-CELLS; FOOD; PRODUCTS; PROTEINS;
D O I
10.5713/ajas.20.0419
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Plant-based meat analogues, edible insects, and cultured meat are promising major meat alternatives that can be used as protein sources in the future. It is also believed that the importance of meat alternatives will continue to increase because of concerns on limited sustainability of the traditional meat production system. The meat alternatives are expected to have different roles based on their different benefits and limitations. Plant-based meat analogues and edible insects can replace traditional meat as a good protein source from the perspective of nutritional value. Furthermore, plant-based meat can be made available to a wide range of consumers (e.g., as vegetarian or halal food products). However, despite ongoing technical developments, their palatability, including appearance, flavor, and texture, is still different from the consumers' standard established from livestock-based traditional meat. Meanwhile, cultured meat is the only method to produce actual animal muscle-based meat; therefore, the final product is more meat-like compared to other meat analogues. However, technical difficulties, especially in mass production and cost, remain before it can be commercialized. Nevertheless, these meat alternatives can be a part of our future protein sources while maintaining a complementary relationship with traditional meat.
引用
收藏
页码:1533 / 1543
页数:11
相关论文
共 80 条
[1]   Extrusion and Extruded Products: Changes in Quality Attributes as Affected by Extrusion Process Parameters: A Review [J].
Alam, M. S. ;
Kaur, Jasmeen ;
Khaira, Harjot ;
Gupta, Kalika .
CRITICAL REVIEWS IN FOOD SCIENCE AND NUTRITION, 2016, 56 (03) :445-473
[2]   Could consumption of insects, cultured meat or imitation meat reduce global agricultural land use? [J].
Alexander, Peter ;
Brown, Calum ;
Arneth, Almut ;
Dias, Clare ;
Finnigan, John ;
Moran, Dominic ;
Rounsevell, Mark D. A. .
GLOBAL FOOD SECURITY-AGRICULTURE POLICY ECONOMICS AND ENVIRONMENT, 2017, 15 :22-32
[3]  
Arshad MS, 2017, COGENT FOOD AGR, V3, DOI 10.1080/23311932.2017.1320814
[4]   Nonmeat Protein Alternatives as Meat Extenders and Meat Analogs [J].
Asgar, M. A. ;
Fazilah, A. ;
Huda, Nurul ;
Bhat, Rajeev ;
Karim, A. A. .
COMPREHENSIVE REVIEWS IN FOOD SCIENCE AND FOOD SAFETY, 2010, 9 (05) :513-529
[5]   In vitro meat production: Challenges and benefits over conventional meat production [J].
Bhat, Zuhaib Fayaz ;
Kumar, Sunil ;
Fayaz, Hina .
JOURNAL OF INTEGRATIVE AGRICULTURE, 2015, 14 (02) :241-248
[6]   Prospectus of cultured meat-advancing meat alternatives [J].
Bhat, Zuhaib Fayaz ;
Fayaz, Hina .
JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY-MYSORE, 2011, 48 (02) :125-140
[7]   An investigation of the formulation and nutritional composition of modern meat analogue products [J].
Bohrer, Benjamin M. .
FOOD SCIENCE AND HUMAN WELLNESS, 2019, 8 (04) :320-329
[8]   What is artificial meat and what does it mean for the future of the meat industry? [J].
Bonny, Sarah P. F. ;
Gardner, Graham E. ;
Pethick, David W. ;
Hocquette, Jean-Francois .
JOURNAL OF INTEGRATIVE AGRICULTURE, 2015, 14 (02) :255-263
[9]   Consumer acceptance of cultured meat: A systematic review [J].
Bryant, Christopher ;
Barnett, Julie .
MEAT SCIENCE, 2018, 143 :8-17
[10]   The nutritional value of edible insects [J].
Bukkens, SGF .
ECOLOGY OF FOOD AND NUTRITION, 1997, 36 (2-4) :287-319