Mapping and understanding the decision-making process for providing nutrition and hydration to people living with dementia: a systematic review

被引:18
|
作者
Anantapong, Kanthee [1 ,2 ]
Davies, Nathan [1 ,3 ]
Chan, Justin [1 ]
McInnerney, Daisy [1 ]
Sampson, Elizabeth L. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] UCL, Marie Curie Palliat Care Res Dept, Div Psychiat, London, England
[2] Prince Songkla Univ, Fac Med, Dept Psychiat, Hat Yai, Thailand
[3] UCL, Ctr Ageing Populat Studies, Res Dept Primary Care & Populat Hlth, London, England
[4] North Middlesex Univ Hosp, Barnet Enfield & Haringey Mental Hlth Trust Liais, Sterling Way, London, England
基金
英国经济与社会研究理事会;
关键词
Aging; Alzheimer’ s disease; Dementia; Decision making; Dehydration; Feeding methods; Nutrition; Systematic review; NURSING-HOME PATIENTS; PERCUTANEOUS ENDOSCOPIC GASTROSTOMY; ARTIFICIAL NUTRITION; FEEDING DECISIONS; TERMINALLY-ILL; PATIENT; FAMILY; PHYSICIANS; NURSES; LIFE;
D O I
10.1186/s12877-020-01931-y
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
Background This systematic review aimed to explore the process of decision-making for nutrition and hydration for people living with dementia from the perspectives and experiences of all involved. Methods We searched CINAHL, the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, MEDLINE and PsycINFO databases. Search terms were related to dementia, decision-making, nutrition and hydration. Qualitative, quantitative and case studies that focused on decision-making about nutrition and hydration for people living with dementia were included. The CASP and Murad tools were used to appraise the quality of included studies. Data extraction was guided by the Interprofessional Shared Decision Making (IP-SDM) model. We conducted a narrative synthesis using thematic analysis. PROSPERO registration number CRD42019131497. Results Forty-five studies were included (20 qualitative, 15 quantitative and 10 case studies), comprising data from 17 countries and 6020 patients, family caregivers and practitioners. The studies covered a range of decisions from managing oral feeding to the use of tube feeding. We found that decisions about nutrition and hydration for people living with dementia were generally too complex to be mapped onto the precise linear steps of the existing decision-making model. Decision-making processes around feeding for people living with dementia were largely influenced by medical evidence, personal values, cultures and organizational routine. Although the process involved multiple people, family caregivers and non-physician practitioners were often excluded in making a final decision. Upon disagreement, nutrition interventions were sometimes delivered with conflicting feelings concealed by family caregivers or practitioners. Most conflicts and negative feelings were resolved by good relationship, honest communication, multidisciplinary team meetings and renegotiation. Conclusions The decision-making process regarding nutrition and hydration for people living with dementia does not follow a linear process. It needs an informed, value-sensitive, and collaborative process. However, it often characterized by unclear procedures and with a lack of support. Decisional support is needed and should be approached in a shared and stepwise manner.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Risk assessment for people living with dementia: a systematic review
    Hoe, Juanita
    Profyri, Elena
    Kemp, Charlotte
    Manela, Monica
    Webster, Lucy
    Anthony, Justine
    Costafreda, Sergi
    Arrojo, Frank
    Souris, Helen
    Livingston, Gill
    INTERNATIONAL PSYCHOGERIATRICS, 2024, 36 (04) : 263 - 288
  • [42] Usability of web-based tools designed for communication and decision-making in dementia: Systematic review and design brief
    Monnet, Fanny
    Craven, Michael P.
    Dupont, Charless
    Van den Block, Lieve
    Pivodic, Lara
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2024, 188
  • [43] Enhancing the decision-making process when considering artificial nutrition in advanced dementia care
    De, Diana
    Thomas, Carol
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PALLIATIVE NURSING, 2019, 25 (05) : 216 - 223
  • [44] The experience of shared decision-making for people with asthma: A systematic review and metasynthesis of qualitative studies
    Kang, Hui-qi
    Pen, Yueming
    He, Yuanyuan
    Yang, Xiufen
    Su, Jin
    Yang, Qiaohong
    Luo, Weixiang
    HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2024, 27 (02)
  • [45] Decision-making in caring for people with dementia at the end of life in nursing homes
    Koppitz, Andrea
    Bosshard, Georg
    Kipfer, Stephanie
    Imhof, Lorenz
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PALLIATIVE NURSING, 2016, 22 (02) : 68 - 75
  • [46] Gaps in Understanding the Experiences of Homecare Workers Providing Care for People with Dementia up to the End of Life: A Systematic Review
    D'Astous, Valerie
    Abrams, Ruth
    Vandrevala, Tushna
    Samsi, Kritika
    Manthorpe, Jill
    DEMENTIA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2019, 18 (03): : 970 - 989
  • [47] Comorbid Dementia and Cancer Therapy Decision-Making: A Scoping Review
    Halpin, Sean N.
    Alain, Gabriel
    Seaman, Aaron
    Stevens, Erin E.
    Zhao, Hui
    Fowler, Mackenzie E.
    Zhang, Qiuyang
    Cadet, Tamara
    Ye, Minzhi
    Krok-Schoen, Jessica L.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED GERONTOLOGY, 2024, 43 (08) : 1132 - 1143
  • [48] Emotion regulation and decision-making in persons with dementia: A scoping review
    Perach, Rotem
    Rusted, Jennifer
    Harris, Peter R.
    Miles, Eleanor
    DEMENTIA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2021, 20 (05): : 1832 - 1854
  • [49] A systematic review of decision-making in remanufacturing
    Rizova, Mirena Isaeva
    Wong, T. C.
    Ijomah, Winifred
    COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2020, 147 (147)
  • [50] Shared decision-making in palliative cancer care: A systematic review and metasynthesis
    Rabben, Jannicke
    Vivat, Bella
    Fossum, Mariann
    Rohde, Gudrun Elin
    PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2024, 38 (04) : 406 - 422