Mapping and understanding the decision-making process for providing nutrition and hydration to people living with dementia: a systematic review

被引:18
|
作者
Anantapong, Kanthee [1 ,2 ]
Davies, Nathan [1 ,3 ]
Chan, Justin [1 ]
McInnerney, Daisy [1 ]
Sampson, Elizabeth L. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] UCL, Marie Curie Palliat Care Res Dept, Div Psychiat, London, England
[2] Prince Songkla Univ, Fac Med, Dept Psychiat, Hat Yai, Thailand
[3] UCL, Ctr Ageing Populat Studies, Res Dept Primary Care & Populat Hlth, London, England
[4] North Middlesex Univ Hosp, Barnet Enfield & Haringey Mental Hlth Trust Liais, Sterling Way, London, England
基金
英国经济与社会研究理事会;
关键词
Aging; Alzheimer’ s disease; Dementia; Decision making; Dehydration; Feeding methods; Nutrition; Systematic review; NURSING-HOME PATIENTS; PERCUTANEOUS ENDOSCOPIC GASTROSTOMY; ARTIFICIAL NUTRITION; FEEDING DECISIONS; TERMINALLY-ILL; PATIENT; FAMILY; PHYSICIANS; NURSES; LIFE;
D O I
10.1186/s12877-020-01931-y
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
Background This systematic review aimed to explore the process of decision-making for nutrition and hydration for people living with dementia from the perspectives and experiences of all involved. Methods We searched CINAHL, the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, MEDLINE and PsycINFO databases. Search terms were related to dementia, decision-making, nutrition and hydration. Qualitative, quantitative and case studies that focused on decision-making about nutrition and hydration for people living with dementia were included. The CASP and Murad tools were used to appraise the quality of included studies. Data extraction was guided by the Interprofessional Shared Decision Making (IP-SDM) model. We conducted a narrative synthesis using thematic analysis. PROSPERO registration number CRD42019131497. Results Forty-five studies were included (20 qualitative, 15 quantitative and 10 case studies), comprising data from 17 countries and 6020 patients, family caregivers and practitioners. The studies covered a range of decisions from managing oral feeding to the use of tube feeding. We found that decisions about nutrition and hydration for people living with dementia were generally too complex to be mapped onto the precise linear steps of the existing decision-making model. Decision-making processes around feeding for people living with dementia were largely influenced by medical evidence, personal values, cultures and organizational routine. Although the process involved multiple people, family caregivers and non-physician practitioners were often excluded in making a final decision. Upon disagreement, nutrition interventions were sometimes delivered with conflicting feelings concealed by family caregivers or practitioners. Most conflicts and negative feelings were resolved by good relationship, honest communication, multidisciplinary team meetings and renegotiation. Conclusions The decision-making process regarding nutrition and hydration for people living with dementia does not follow a linear process. It needs an informed, value-sensitive, and collaborative process. However, it often characterized by unclear procedures and with a lack of support. Decisional support is needed and should be approached in a shared and stepwise manner.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] What is the Impact of Volunteers Providing Care and Support for People with Dementia in Acute Hospitals? A Systematic Review
    Hall, Claire L.
    Brooke, Joanne
    Pendlebury, Sarah T.
    Jackson, Debra
    DEMENTIA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2019, 18 (04): : 1410 - 1426
  • [32] Living with dementia, interdependence and citizenship: narratives of everyday decision-making
    Keyes, Sarah E.
    Clarke, Charlotte L.
    Gibb, Catherine E.
    DISABILITY & SOCIETY, 2019, 34 (02) : 296 - 319
  • [33] Nursing staff participation in end-of-life nutrition and hydration decision-making in a nursing home: A qualitative study
    Firnhaber, Gina C.
    Roberson, Donna W.
    Kolasa, Kathryn M.
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2020, 76 (11) : 3059 - 3068
  • [34] Narrative Interest Standard: A Novel Approach to Surrogate Decision-Making for People With Dementia
    Wilkins, James M.
    GERONTOLOGIST, 2018, 58 (06): : 1016 - 1020
  • [35] Preferences of lung cancer patients for treatment and decision-making: a systematic literature review
    Schmidt, K.
    Damm, K.
    Prenzler, A.
    Golpon, H.
    Welte, T.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER CARE, 2016, 25 (04) : 580 - 591
  • [36] Understanding a Player's Decision-Making Process in Team Sports: A Systematic Review of Empirical Evidence
    Ashford, Michael
    Abraham, Andrew
    Poolton, Jamie
    SPORTS, 2021, 9 (05)
  • [37] Factors Influencing Emergency Department Staff Decision-Making for People Attending in Suicidal Crisis: A Systematic Review
    McCarthy, Molly
    McIntyre, Jason
    Nathan, Rajan
    Saini, Pooja
    ARCHIVES OF SUICIDE RESEARCH, 2024, 28 (01) : 35 - 49
  • [38] The effect of the Internet on decision-making during pregnancy: a systematic review
    Tastekin Ouyaba, Ayse
    Infal Kesim, Selma
    ARCHIVES OF WOMENS MENTAL HEALTH, 2021, 24 (02) : 205 - 215
  • [39] A shared decision-making model about care for people with severe dementia: A qualitative study based on nutrition and hydration decisions in acute hospitals
    Anantapong, Kanthee
    Sampson, Elizabeth L.
    Davies, Nathan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC PSYCHIATRY, 2023, 38 (02)
  • [40] SUPPORTED DECISION-MAKING FOR PEOPLE LIVING WITH DEMENTIA: AN EXAMINATION OF FOUR AUSTRALIAN GUARDIANSHIP LAWS
    Blake, Meredith
    Stewart, Cameron
    Castelli-Arnold, Pia
    Sinclair, Craig
    JOURNAL OF LAW AND MEDICINE, 2021, 28 (02) : 389 - 420