Mapping and understanding the decision-making process for providing nutrition and hydration to people living with dementia: a systematic review

被引:18
|
作者
Anantapong, Kanthee [1 ,2 ]
Davies, Nathan [1 ,3 ]
Chan, Justin [1 ]
McInnerney, Daisy [1 ]
Sampson, Elizabeth L. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] UCL, Marie Curie Palliat Care Res Dept, Div Psychiat, London, England
[2] Prince Songkla Univ, Fac Med, Dept Psychiat, Hat Yai, Thailand
[3] UCL, Ctr Ageing Populat Studies, Res Dept Primary Care & Populat Hlth, London, England
[4] North Middlesex Univ Hosp, Barnet Enfield & Haringey Mental Hlth Trust Liais, Sterling Way, London, England
基金
英国经济与社会研究理事会;
关键词
Aging; Alzheimer’ s disease; Dementia; Decision making; Dehydration; Feeding methods; Nutrition; Systematic review; NURSING-HOME PATIENTS; PERCUTANEOUS ENDOSCOPIC GASTROSTOMY; ARTIFICIAL NUTRITION; FEEDING DECISIONS; TERMINALLY-ILL; PATIENT; FAMILY; PHYSICIANS; NURSES; LIFE;
D O I
10.1186/s12877-020-01931-y
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
Background This systematic review aimed to explore the process of decision-making for nutrition and hydration for people living with dementia from the perspectives and experiences of all involved. Methods We searched CINAHL, the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, MEDLINE and PsycINFO databases. Search terms were related to dementia, decision-making, nutrition and hydration. Qualitative, quantitative and case studies that focused on decision-making about nutrition and hydration for people living with dementia were included. The CASP and Murad tools were used to appraise the quality of included studies. Data extraction was guided by the Interprofessional Shared Decision Making (IP-SDM) model. We conducted a narrative synthesis using thematic analysis. PROSPERO registration number CRD42019131497. Results Forty-five studies were included (20 qualitative, 15 quantitative and 10 case studies), comprising data from 17 countries and 6020 patients, family caregivers and practitioners. The studies covered a range of decisions from managing oral feeding to the use of tube feeding. We found that decisions about nutrition and hydration for people living with dementia were generally too complex to be mapped onto the precise linear steps of the existing decision-making model. Decision-making processes around feeding for people living with dementia were largely influenced by medical evidence, personal values, cultures and organizational routine. Although the process involved multiple people, family caregivers and non-physician practitioners were often excluded in making a final decision. Upon disagreement, nutrition interventions were sometimes delivered with conflicting feelings concealed by family caregivers or practitioners. Most conflicts and negative feelings were resolved by good relationship, honest communication, multidisciplinary team meetings and renegotiation. Conclusions The decision-making process regarding nutrition and hydration for people living with dementia does not follow a linear process. It needs an informed, value-sensitive, and collaborative process. However, it often characterized by unclear procedures and with a lack of support. Decisional support is needed and should be approached in a shared and stepwise manner.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Systematic review of shared decision-making interventions for people living with chronic respiratory diseases
    Barradell, Amy C.
    Gerlis, Charlotte
    Houchen-Wolloff, Linzy
    Bekker, Hilary L.
    Robertson, Noelle
    Singh, Sally J.
    BMJ OPEN, 2023, 13 (05):
  • [22] Reproductive decision-making of Black women living with HIV: A systematic review
    Huertas-Zurriaga, Ariadna
    Palmieri, Patrick A.
    Aguayo-Gonzalez, Mariela P.
    Dominguez-Cancino, Karen A.
    Casanovas-Cuellar, Cristina
    Vander Linden, Kara L.
    Cesario, Sandra K.
    Edwards, Joan E.
    Leyva-Moral, Juan M.
    WOMENS HEALTH, 2022, 18
  • [23] Reproductive decision-making of Black women living with HIV: A systematic review
    Huertas-Zurriaga, Ariadna
    Palmieri, Patrick A.
    Aguayo-Gonzalez, Mariela P.
    Dominguez-Cancino, Karen A.
    Casanovas-Cuellar, Cristina
    Vander Linden, Kara L.
    Cesario, Sandra K.
    Edwards, Joan E.
    Leyva-Moral, Juan M.
    WOMENS HEALTH, 2022, 18
  • [24] Interprofessional clinical decision-making process in health: A scoping review
    Bouchez, Tiphanie
    Cagnon, Clemence
    Hamouche, Gouraya
    Majdoub, Marouan
    Charlet, Jean
    Schuers, Matthieu
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2024, 80 (03) : 884 - 907
  • [25] Current understanding of decision-making in adolescents with cancer: A narrative systematic review
    Day, Emma
    Jones, Louise
    Langner, Richard
    Bluebond-Langner, Myra
    PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2016, 30 (10) : 920 - 934
  • [26] A systematic review of barriers and facilitators to and interventions for proxy decision-making by family carers of people with dementia
    Lord, Kathryn
    Livingston, Gill
    Cooper, Claudia
    INTERNATIONAL PSYCHOGERIATRICS, 2015, 27 (08) : 1301 - 1312
  • [27] Family caregivers and decision-making for older people with dementia
    Giertz, Lottie
    Emilsson, Ulla Melin
    Vingare, Emme-Li
    JOURNAL OF SOCIAL WELFARE AND FAMILY LAW, 2019, 41 (03) : 321 - 338
  • [28] How do person-centered outcome measures enable shared decision-making for people with dementia and family carers?-A systematic review
    Aworinde, Jesutofunmi
    Ellis-Smith, Clare
    Gillam, Juliet
    Roche, Moise
    Coombes, Lucy
    Yorganci, Emel
    Evans, Catherine J.
    ALZHEIMERS & DEMENTIA-TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH & CLINICAL INTERVENTIONS, 2022, 8 (01)
  • [29] Systematic Review: Individuals' Goals for Surrogate Decision-Making
    Kelly, Brenna
    Rid, Annette
    Wendler, David
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2012, 60 (05) : 884 - 895
  • [30] Supported decision-making for older people living with dementia: contributions from bioethics
    Cunha, Isis de Oliveira Machado
    Garrafa, Volnei
    CIENCIA & SAUDE COLETIVA, 2023, 28 (11): : 3149 - 3158