Mapping and understanding the decision-making process for providing nutrition and hydration to people living with dementia: a systematic review

被引:18
|
作者
Anantapong, Kanthee [1 ,2 ]
Davies, Nathan [1 ,3 ]
Chan, Justin [1 ]
McInnerney, Daisy [1 ]
Sampson, Elizabeth L. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] UCL, Marie Curie Palliat Care Res Dept, Div Psychiat, London, England
[2] Prince Songkla Univ, Fac Med, Dept Psychiat, Hat Yai, Thailand
[3] UCL, Ctr Ageing Populat Studies, Res Dept Primary Care & Populat Hlth, London, England
[4] North Middlesex Univ Hosp, Barnet Enfield & Haringey Mental Hlth Trust Liais, Sterling Way, London, England
基金
英国经济与社会研究理事会;
关键词
Aging; Alzheimer’ s disease; Dementia; Decision making; Dehydration; Feeding methods; Nutrition; Systematic review; NURSING-HOME PATIENTS; PERCUTANEOUS ENDOSCOPIC GASTROSTOMY; ARTIFICIAL NUTRITION; FEEDING DECISIONS; TERMINALLY-ILL; PATIENT; FAMILY; PHYSICIANS; NURSES; LIFE;
D O I
10.1186/s12877-020-01931-y
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
Background This systematic review aimed to explore the process of decision-making for nutrition and hydration for people living with dementia from the perspectives and experiences of all involved. Methods We searched CINAHL, the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, MEDLINE and PsycINFO databases. Search terms were related to dementia, decision-making, nutrition and hydration. Qualitative, quantitative and case studies that focused on decision-making about nutrition and hydration for people living with dementia were included. The CASP and Murad tools were used to appraise the quality of included studies. Data extraction was guided by the Interprofessional Shared Decision Making (IP-SDM) model. We conducted a narrative synthesis using thematic analysis. PROSPERO registration number CRD42019131497. Results Forty-five studies were included (20 qualitative, 15 quantitative and 10 case studies), comprising data from 17 countries and 6020 patients, family caregivers and practitioners. The studies covered a range of decisions from managing oral feeding to the use of tube feeding. We found that decisions about nutrition and hydration for people living with dementia were generally too complex to be mapped onto the precise linear steps of the existing decision-making model. Decision-making processes around feeding for people living with dementia were largely influenced by medical evidence, personal values, cultures and organizational routine. Although the process involved multiple people, family caregivers and non-physician practitioners were often excluded in making a final decision. Upon disagreement, nutrition interventions were sometimes delivered with conflicting feelings concealed by family caregivers or practitioners. Most conflicts and negative feelings were resolved by good relationship, honest communication, multidisciplinary team meetings and renegotiation. Conclusions The decision-making process regarding nutrition and hydration for people living with dementia does not follow a linear process. It needs an informed, value-sensitive, and collaborative process. However, it often characterized by unclear procedures and with a lack of support. Decisional support is needed and should be approached in a shared and stepwise manner.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Mapping and understanding the decision-making process for providing nutrition and hydration to people living with dementia: a systematic review
    Kanthee Anantapong
    Nathan Davies
    Justin Chan
    Daisy McInnerney
    Elizabeth L. Sampson
    BMC Geriatrics, 20
  • [2] The nature of decision-making in people living with dementia: a systematic review
    Bhatt, Jem
    Walton, Holly
    Stoner, Charlotte R.
    Scior, Katrina
    Charlesworth, Georgina
    AGING & MENTAL HEALTH, 2020, 24 (03) : 363 - 373
  • [3] Nutrition and hydration for people living with dementia near the end of life: A qualitative systematic review
    Barrado-Martin, Yolanda
    Hatter, Lee
    Moore, Kirsten J.
    Sampson, Elizabeth L.
    Rait, Greta
    Manthorpe, Jill
    Smith, Christina H.
    Nair, Pushpa
    Davies, Nathan
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2021, 77 (02) : 664 - 680
  • [4] Reviewing the landscape of the decision-making process for pain assessment and management for people living with dementia: A systematic review
    Pu, Lihui
    Gamage, Madushika K. O. D. A. G. O. D. A.
    Li, Na
    Barton, Matthew
    Feenstra, Marlies
    Todorovic, Michael
    Moyle, Wendy
    GERIATRIC NURSING, 2025, 61 : 50 - 63
  • [5] Starting artificial nutrition and hydration in patients with dementia in the Netherlands: frequencies, patient characteristics and decision-making process
    van Wigcheren, Petra T.
    Onwuteaka-Philipsen, Bregje D.
    Pasman, H. Roeline W.
    Ooms, Marcel E.
    Ribbe, Miel W.
    van der Wal, Gerrit
    AGING CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH, 2007, 19 (01) : 26 - 33
  • [6] Starting artificial nutrition and hydration in patients with dementia in the Netherlands: frequencies, patient characteristics and decision-making process
    Petra T. van Wigcheren
    Bregje D. Onwuteaka-Philipsen
    H. Roeline W. Pasman
    Marcel E. Ooms
    Miel W. Ribbe
    Gerrit van der Wal
    Aging Clinical and Experimental Research, 2007, 19 : 26 - 33
  • [7] Shared decision-making for people living with dementia in extended care settings: a systematic review
    Daly, Rachel Louise
    Bunn, Frances
    Goodman, Claire
    BMJ OPEN, 2018, 8 (06):
  • [8] Decision aids to support decision-making in dementia care: a systematic review
    Davies, Nathan
    Schiowitz, Brooke
    Rait, Greta
    Vickerstaff, Victoria
    Sampson, Elizabeth L.
    INTERNATIONAL PSYCHOGERIATRICS, 2019, 31 (10) : 1403 - 1419
  • [9] Enhancing shared and surrogate decision making for people living with dementia: A systematic review of the effectiveness of interventions
    Geddis-Regan, Andrew
    Errington, Linda
    Abley, Clare
    Wassall, Rebecca
    Exley, Catherine
    Thomson, Richard
    HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2021, 24 (01) : 19 - 32
  • [10] Decision-making in cancer care for people living with dementia
    Griffiths, Alys Wyn
    Ashley, Laura
    Kelley, Rachael
    Cowdell, Fiona
    Collinson, Michelle
    Mason, Ellen
    Farrin, Amanda
    Henry, Ann
    Inman, Hayley
    Surr, Claire
    PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2020, 29 (08) : 1347 - 1354