Application of species distribution models to explain and predict the distribution, abundance and assemblage structure of nearshore temperate reef fishes

被引:52
作者
Young, Mary [1 ,2 ]
Carr, Mark H. [2 ]
机构
[1] Deakin Univ, Ctr Integrat Ecol, Warrnambool, Vic, Australia
[2] Univ Calif Santa Cruz, Ecol & Evolutionary Biol, Santa Cruz, CA 95064 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
generalized additive models; marine landscape ecology; marine protected areas; marine spatial management; species distribution models; temperate reef fishes; MARINE PROTECTED AREAS; CALIFORNIA; HABITAT; BIODIVERSITY; RESPONSES; NETWORK; DESIGN; KELP; BATHYMETRY; VEGETATION;
D O I
10.1111/ddi.12378
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Aim The purpose of this study was to create predictive species distribution models (SDMs) for temperate reef-associated fish species densities and fish assemblage diversity and richness to aid in marine conservation and spatial planning. Location California, USA. Methods Using generalized additive models, we associated fish species densities and assemblage characteristics with seafloor structure, giant kelp biomass and wave climate and used these associations to predict the distribution and assemblage structure across the study area. We tested the accuracy of these predicted extrapolations using an independent data set. The SDMs were also used to estimate larger scale abundances to compare with other estimates of species abundance (uniform density extrapolation over rocky reef and density extrapolations taking into account variations in geomorphic structure). Results The SDMs successfully modelled the species-habitat relationships of seven rocky reef-associated fish species and showed that species' densities differed in their relationships with environmental variables. The predictive accuracy of the SDMs ranged from 0.26 to 0.60 (Pearson's r correlation between observed and predicted density values). The SDMs created for the fish assemblage-level variables had higher prediction accuracies with Pearson's r values of 0.61 for diversity and 0.71 for richness. The comparisons of the different methods for extrapolating species densities over a single marine protected area varied greatly in their abundance estimates with the uniform extrapolation (density values extrapolated evenly over the rocky reef) always estimating much greater abundances. The other two methods, which took into account variation in the geomorphic structure of the reef, provided much lower abundance estimates. Main conclusions Species distribution models that combine geomorphic, oceanographic and biogenic habitat variables can reliably predict spatial patterns of species density and assemblage attributes of temperate reef fishes at spatial scales of 50m. Thus, SDMs show great promise for informing spatial and ecosystem-based approaches to conservation and fisheries management.
引用
收藏
页码:1428 / 1440
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Nonparametric Identifiability in Species Distribution and Abundance Models: Why it Matters and How to Diagnose a Lack of it Using Simulation [J].
Stoudt, Sara ;
de Valpine, Perry ;
Fithian, William .
JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL THEORY AND PRACTICE, 2023, 17 (03)
[22]   Using species richness and functional traits predictions to constrain assemblage predictions from stacked species distribution models [J].
D'Amen, Manuela ;
Dubuis, Anne ;
Fernandes, Rui F. ;
Pottier, Julien ;
Pellissier, Loic ;
Guisan, Antoine .
JOURNAL OF BIOGEOGRAPHY, 2015, 42 (07) :1255-1266
[23]   Do species distribution models predict species richness in urban and natural green spaces? A case study using amphibians [J].
Milanovich, Joseph R. ;
Peterman, William E. ;
Barrett, Kyle ;
Hopton, Matthew E. .
LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2012, 107 (04) :409-418
[24]   Use of ecological niche models to predict the distribution of invasive species: a scientometric analysis [J].
Barbosa, F. G. ;
Schneck, F. ;
Melo, A. S. .
BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF BIOLOGY, 2012, 72 (04) :821-829
[25]   esdm: A tool for creating and exploring ensembles of predictions from species distribution and abundance models [J].
Woodman, Samuel M. ;
Forney, Karin A. ;
Becker, Elizabeth A. ;
DeAngelis, Monica L. ;
Hazen, Elliott L. ;
Palacios, Daniel M. ;
Redfern, Jessica, V .
METHODS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2019, 10 (11) :1923-1933
[26]   Spatiotemporal Models of an Estuarine Fish Species to Identify Patterns and Factors Impacting Their Distribution and Abundance [J].
Polansky, Leo ;
Newman, Ken B. ;
Nobriga, Matthew L. ;
Mitchell, Lara .
ESTUARIES AND COASTS, 2018, 41 (02) :572-581
[27]   Using ecological niche models to predict the abundance and impact of invasive species: application to the common carp [J].
Kulhanek, Stefanie A. ;
Leung, Brian ;
Ricciardi, Anthony .
ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2011, 21 (01) :203-213
[28]   The relative contribution of terrain, land cover, and vegetation structure indices to species distribution models [J].
Wilson, John W. ;
Sexton, Joseph O. ;
Jobe, R. Todd ;
Haddad, Nick M. .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2013, 164 :170-176
[29]   Improving species distribution model predictive accuracy using species abundance: Application with boosted regression trees [J].
Yu, Hao ;
Cooper, Arthur R. ;
Infante, Dana M. .
ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2020, 432
[30]   Comparing estimates of abundance trends and distribution shifts using single- and multispecies models of fishes and biogenic habitat [J].
Thorson, James T. ;
Barnett, Lewis A. K. .
ICES JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE, 2017, 74 (05) :1311-1321